|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 March 2013, 08:56 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central ct.
Watch: Tudor 79180
Posts: 5
|
tudor oysterdate
  New to forum but not Rolex. Just picked up the 1964 Tudor oysterdate. Was the crystal on the originally a cyclops or is the one on it correct? Any thoughts on the watch or band choices would be great as well. Lots of informative reading on this site. Thanks.. |
|
|
|
6 March 2013, 11:13 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Rod
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: YG DD 18238
Posts: 1,540
|
Can't help with your question, but that's a great looking piece. Love the rose.
__________________
I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made. -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
|
|
|
|
6 March 2013, 11:17 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Shane
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,125
|
That is a great looking Prince! I don't know the answer to your question, but the date seems very readable as is without cyclops making me think that is the right crystal. Just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
6 March 2013, 12:37 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 16800 (1981)
Posts: 315
|
That's a great piece. I do believe it would have had a cyclops originally, but I'd rather have it without.
|
|
|
|
|
6 March 2013, 01:03 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Erich
Location: -5
Posts: 742
|
beautiful big rose! congratulations!!
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
