|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 March 2013, 04:31 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
|
14060m - 5513
Here are a few pics of a 2008 14060m beside a 1969 5513 . May have been done before , but I thought some people might want to see what's different and the same .😁
Here is a wrist shot (never done in public) Mike B , Canada ⌚ |
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 04:40 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
Man I LOVE the SUB, and the older bracelet. The older one looks like the bracelet is even thinner, which seems like it would wear even lighter.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
 |
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 05:11 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Fake surname
Location: matters
Watch: me goin' bonkers
Posts: 295
|
great comparo
|
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 05:15 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: James
Location: New Providence,NJ
Watch: Submariner 14060
Posts: 2,371
|
Great shots! Thanks for the comparison photos...
...although one of them isn't keeping accurate time  
|
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 05:52 AM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
Both are very nice
|
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 05:54 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
i would go for the 5513!
__________________
 2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 06:10 AM
|
#7 | |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
|
Quote:
__________________
 Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron  P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 06:46 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lancashire
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 100
|
Great comparison, side by side, do they wear differently. Is the 55 higher, do you catch it on more things?
|
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 06:53 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Shane
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,125
|
Great pair of Subs!
|
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 08:33 AM
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
|
The 14060m feels heavier , I'll get a rough weight and let you know. I've had the m longer than the 5513. It seemed to get caught up on more things but its still to early to tell. I'll post more pictures concerning the height when I get a chance.
Mike B , Canada ⌚ |
|
|
|
|
8 March 2013, 08:36 AM
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
|
The 14060m wasn't keeping the right time. Once I bought the 5513 I haven't worn it . The 14060m is on it's way out for a vintage Gmt as I type. But I will still have 2 subs (7016/0)
Mike B , Canada ⌚ |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
