|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 March 2013, 07:37 PM
|
#91 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: "City of Angels"
Watch: 116613LN serti
Posts: 214
|
Yes. The cyclop is one of the reasons that makes Rolex unique and iconic. Plus the magnification of the date helps a lot when reading it. However, without the cyclops, the watch would more symmetrically and "clean" looking but at the same time look like any other mechanical dive watches out there. The cyclop adds uniqueness.
|
|
|
|
10 March 2013, 08:15 PM
|
#92 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Here and there
Posts: 935
|
No cyclops for me.
|
|
|
|
|
10 March 2013, 09:18 PM
|
#93 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
If I didn't have cyclops... the. I would need to walk around like this all day:
Haha kidding! I have 20/20 vision. I appreciate and love it how it makes Rolex, a Rolex, but if it were optional, I'd rather not have it on my SubC date. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
