ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 March 2013, 09:37 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 795
|
Snowflake opinions?
What does everyone think about this Tudor snowflake?
|
29 March 2013, 11:24 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Miami Beach
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 327
|
Adore it! I'm biased, I have one as well
__________________
David 16610,16610LV,16613Serti,16622,116520, PAM 088, 1680, 1675,AP ROO AlighaniPolaris,Tudor 9411 ,1665,6536-1,5513,1655,PAM 425 SLC;BLNR,116655 |
29 March 2013, 11:28 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,011
|
Very nice--classics!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
29 March 2013, 12:11 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 795
|
Does everything look correct?
|
29 March 2013, 01:04 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
|
From what I can see it looks good .
Mike B , Canada ⌚ |
29 March 2013, 09:14 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Shanghai
Watch: Too many to tell
Posts: 522
|
Photo is taken at an angle such that one cannot assess how polished the case is. The crown guards, the date disk or the cyclops all remain hidden. All of them must-sees to assess how kosher the watch is.
Picture does not have enough resolution on the dial, but lume does not look dark enough for how deteriorated the lume plots are. I am aware that darkness and deterioration should not necessarily go hand in hand, but lume looks too light to me. Apart from that, the dial looks alright. Does it look downright bad /fake? No. Would I buy based on this pic? No. |
30 March 2013, 02:45 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Post a link to the auction. I also don't entirely like the dial. Seems too clean but I need more
|
30 March 2013, 03:48 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 7021/0 Tudor Sub
Posts: 48
|
|
30 March 2013, 03:49 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Dave
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 7021/0 Tudor Sub
Posts: 48
|
|
30 March 2013, 04:26 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
Buy the Seller as they say around here and in this case I wouldn't buy from someone who is banned over at VRF for selling fake merchandize.
|
30 March 2013, 04:53 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: S.Florida/Ontario
Watch: 6263, 1675
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
g-comex
__________________
life is good |
|
30 March 2013, 05:03 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
search for g-comex on VRF
|
30 March 2013, 08:19 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMT Master 16750
Posts: 795
|
Thanks for the heads up. That is the seller. It seemed odd there were no pictures of the date window and I noticed in one of the pictures some damage to the dial in that area. When I asked about it he did confirm there was damage there. Not sure if he was intentionally hiding this but it seems like it from the lack of pictures.
|
30 March 2013, 08:39 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Shanghai
Watch: Too many to tell
Posts: 522
|
Quote:
I might have seen this watch in HK recently, if it has dial damage in the date window area as you say. Now that I think of it, shouldn't we have a Dealer blacklist somewhere in the Forum too? I know it's risky, but I think we should. At least we should have threads with Dealer names where customers chime in and talk about their transactions.... |
|
1 April 2013, 12:27 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
|
He knows the picture angles that buyers want ! If he's banned , I would stay away , no honour ! Out for himself 100% , lucky you found out now ! 👍
Mike B , Canada ⌚ |
1 April 2013, 11:13 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
from an academic point of view, i think the case and back and insert are all good. i just dont know what to make of that dial. seems too good to be true. too expensive anyway.
|
2 April 2013, 12:12 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
|
Dial may be genuine, just damaged as mentioned earlier but not shown in the photos. $3200 head only should be a bit nicer methinks
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
2 April 2013, 01:34 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 332
|
As far as Snowflake options go , I believe you can get Black OR Blue . If you have to have Red then you have to go Black Bay !
Lol 😁😜 Mike B , Canada ⌚ |
3 April 2013, 07:14 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
|
I am always wary when ads for vintage watches boldly state "dial never refinished or retouched or repainted in any way whatsoever" yet they offer no story to back up that certainty. Especially when the patina of the hands and dial perfectly match.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.