wearing a submariner

[shirtguy]

for those that have a sub did it take time getting use to the heavyness ?

and due to the thick case did it stand up on the wrist?

[padi56]

Originally Posted by shirtguy

for those that have a sub did it take time getting use to the heavyness ?

and due to the thick case did it stand up on the wrist?

Would call any of the sub range heavy watches and cases are not all that thick for a sports watch.The 16610 weight around 135grams, 14060M around 127grams. The newer ceramic 116610, 114060M models are a little heavier around 152 grams,even the DSSD although it is a thicker watch, is around 215 grams which is still not all that heavy.

[cop414]

I went from a DOXA which was heavier and quite a bit higher on the wrist so it was the opposite for me. All comes down to what you are comparing it to I guess.

[mjclark32]

I went from an IWC AT to a 16610, not heavy at all IMO.

[akira23]

I went from a Pam 001D to a 14060m to a dssd, which is heavy compared to the 14060m.

[Daytona-Dan]

The SS SubC? No, not at all it felt extremely comfortable and the thick caseback just lifts it off your wrist a few mm. The YG Daytona however, that's another story. It takes a bit of getting used to but in a really good way!

The weight of the SS Sub is perfect and I like the fact that the YG is heavy, in fact, I love it, but it's heavy for a reason and if I had an SS watch this heavy, I don't think I would feel the same about it.

[Kingair]

A Sub is not heavy . . . a DSSD . . . is another thing

HAGOne

[sea-dweller]

My Subs fit well when I first tried them on. I find the Explorer 1 and II's to be lighter.

[RMC12]

Haven't really noticed the wieght of mine at all, so I guess the answer for me is no. Fits well under shirts, both single and double cuffed, so no problem with height from the wrist for me.

[diver2012]

Try on a gold Royal Oak Offshore and then come back and ask if it's heavy!

[Dr. Robert]

It ain't heavy, it's my submariner.

[Hazelnut]

I went from a Milgauss to a Sub C so for me it was even lighter and sits closer to the wrist! No complaints here. Sub weight is just right to me.

[shirtguy]

Im going from a strap dj to sub

[Furbo]

Added GMT to my collection, wore SubC before, still getting used to how it sits lower, I liked it raised a bit.

[samsmart]

You will get used to it pretty quick. I having been wearing a SD, a little Heavier than a Sub, and hardly notice it now.

[landroverking]

Not at all. My 18kt Sub on the other hand yes somewhat.

[Clutch Cargo]

The only watch I have ever worn where I noticed its weight was an Omega Seamaster chronograph. I have a SubC no-date, SubC Blue TT and, a DSSD. I put them on in the morning and never notice I'm wearing a watch until I look at it.

[aeon888]

Unless it is a one pound watch then the weight of the watch will not bother me wearing it. ;)

[T. Ferguson]

From reading the responses it is obvious the perceived heft is relative to what you have been used to wearing. But I would be surprised if the SS Sub is much heavier (if at all) than the WG DJ you are currently wearing.

But to answer your question, yes, you will get used to it. Moreover, you will come to love the feeling of having a watch of real substance on your wrist. While it sits taller than the DJ, it has little problem nesting under the cuff of a dress shirt.

[HL65]

Very comfortable and easy to wear. Go try one on before you buy and decide for yourself! Cheers,

[analog]

I came from a smaller Tag, and yes, it took about 2 weeks for the Sub to "feel right" - but now I love it. It also took some time to adjust to my shirt cuffs - I had many of my cuffs made larger to fit better.

Stick with it - shouldn't be too long/

[Magic-Matt]

Funny, for me it was the exact opposite! I walked away from a Sub-C brand new for 6000 bucks back in 2011 from Gibraltar because it felt too light and tiny for my taste.

Ended up buying a Glashutte Sports Evo Pano Date. Now that is HEAVY, German tank and built like one too, weighing in at 220grs! Best watch Ive ever owned too, but I like to really feel my watches!

[Rashid.bk]

Submariner, heavy? Sorry but I find this a little ridiculous.
I remember the first time I grabbed a Submariner, I thought it was fake or inferior in quality. Now the SubC has increased in weight marginally compared to the pre-ceramics, but to use the word heavy.....negatron.

[stevedssd]

I bought my subs after a DSSD, so they feel light to me....................

[amaninspired]

I don't find a Sub too heavy and I don't think it sits too high either. Just try it – I'm sure you'll be delighted with it!

[shirtguy]

could it be because the bracelet has some wiggle room?

[motoikkyu]

It all depends what you are used to: I wear a number of 52mm+ and some of them are on bracelets (yes, I am compensating by wearing large watches, I don't deny it!). If I've been wearing only the 6424 for days, a sub seems heavy for a short time.

[shirtguy]

THE CLASP gets stuck on my skin and the watch seems to be in a diffrent direction maybe i should use the glidlock and tighten it a bit?

[Jack T]

Compared to my Planet Ocean 42mm, the Sub was noticeably lighter, although the aesthetics on the Omega are, to me, second to none. But I do tend to wear my Sub more, a lot more.

[bridgs]

I went from a heavier Seiko dive watch to the sub. I think the only thing I had to get used to was the sub case back which has an angled edge which does grind my wrist bone on occasion. The Seiko had a flat case back.