ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Solo118 · 26 July 2013, 02:23 AM

If it had a matte dial and domed crystal absolutely.

Rashid.bk · 26 July 2013, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baco Noir

It has nothing to do with size. It's about adding the ceramic bezel, which if damaged costs thousands to replace versus less than $100 for a metal insert.

It does not cost thousands to replace a ceramic bezel, where do guys get this stuff. Gross exaggeration....It's simple, if you can't afford the the oil changes, tires, insurance, you know maintenance, then don't buy a Ferrari(not directed at you, just general statement to all complainers).

A G-Shock battery cost $3 and a Fossil watch will run you $150, for a whole watch....no pesky bezel price worries for either.

Baco Noir · 26 July 2013, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rashid.bk

It does not cost thousands to replace a ceramic bezel, where do guys get this stuff. Gross exaggeration....It's simple, if you can't afford the the oil changes, tires, insurance, you know maintenance, then don't buy a Ferrari(not directed at you, just general statement to all complainers).

A G-Shock battery cost $3 and a Fossil watch will run you $150, for a whole watch....no pesky bezel price worries for either.

Okay, I hadn't seen any numbers since the initial reports came out and Google just showed me it's closer to $450. Sorry for the misinformation. Still, I'm just not a fan of the glossy ceramic bezel. The matte ceramic on the Pelagos with the lumed numbers still has a tool watch look IMHO, and YES that is one I am actually considering buying.

patnmand · 26 July 2013, 07:10 AM

My first reaction on seeing the subject was "Sea Dweller with new lume, ceramic bezel and glide lock? Hell yes!" but on reflection I think I feel the same as others - the 16600 is damned near perfect as it is, so no.

nauticajoe · 26 July 2013, 07:13 AM

No way. I like it the way it is/was.

Rashid.bk · 26 July 2013, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baco Noir

Okay, I hadn't seen any numbers since the initial reports came out and Google just showed me it's closer to $450. Sorry for the misinformation. Still, I'm just not a fan of the glossy ceramic bezel. The matte ceramic on the Pelagos with the lumed numbers still has a tool watch look IMHO, and YES that is one I am actually considering buying.

alls well that ends well.

love the pelagos too btw.

joejoe1225 · 28 July 2013, 11:15 AM

I would take a good look at it. probably say no way.

You can't beat a classic - LOVE the SD as it is - Perfection!!!

rolex75216 · 28 July 2013, 11:26 AM

I would not purchase one.

mdtddd2007 · 28 July 2013, 01:22 PM

No, I like my original SD.

Billywiz · 28 July 2013, 01:49 PM

Nope.

26 July 2013, 07:10 AM	#34
patnmand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Patrick Location: England Posts: 40	My first reaction on seeing the subject was "Sea Dweller with new lume, ceramic bezel and glide lock? Hell yes!" but on reflection I think I feel the same as others - the 16600 is damned near perfect as it is, so no. __________________ The Swiss: Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600, Breitling Navitimer 01, Tudor Heritage Ranger The Russians: Strela 42mm 3133, Sekonda Strela 3017, Vostok Amphibia 100657 The Others: Nomos Tangente 38 Datum, Bulova Accutron Spaceview, Ancient Pulsar Quartz

28 July 2013, 11:15 AM	#37
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	I would take a good look at it. probably say no way. You can't beat a classic - LOVE the SD as it is - Perfection!!! __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

26 July 2013, 02:23 AM	#31
Solo118 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,092	If it had a matte dial and domed crystal absolutely.

26 July 2013, 07:13 AM	#35
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	No way. I like it the way it is/was.

28 July 2013, 11:26 AM	#38
rolex75216 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: United States Posts: 2,008	I would not purchase one.

28 July 2013, 01:22 PM	#39
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,785	No, I like my original SD.

28 July 2013, 01:49 PM	#40
Billywiz Banned Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: John Location: Florida Watch: YG President Posts: 2,090	Nope.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)