The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 15 October 2013, 11:13 AM   #39
submariner66
"TRF" Member
 
submariner66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tooomey View Post
You should read the hole thread.

By no means do I mean put your classics to rest! I just meant I don't know why anyone would want rolex to bring back anything that has been retired.

Many people don't agree and that's ok but there are many of us that feel the same as I do

FYI. I think the Paul Newman is one of the best looking rolex's ever but that doesn't mean I want rolex to bring it back.

It sounds like some of you are only reading parts of this thread and have know idea what I'm trying to say

Rolex does not need to and should not "bring back the classics" because in my opinion they are still making them!

If anyone needs to bring them back its Omega, they changed too many of their classic watches too quickly. I love that they still offer the Speedmaster unchanged nearly.
submariner66 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.