ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

landroverking · 15 November 2013, 11:41 AM

Would never owe a Sub C.

Bangel · 15 November 2013, 11:55 AM

I voted yes, to cover all those times when you need to go deeper than 300m.

Seriously, I voted yes because I love Rolex dive watches and I think that when these 2 are together in a collection, they make a great representation of the old and new.

Chainring · 15 November 2013, 11:59 AM

Me? No. Too many great watches to have two so similiar. If I had everything else I wanted, then sure, of course.

viper9669 · 15 November 2013, 12:06 PM

I would vote yes, for variety.

They are different, the DSSD is a heftier watch for me thus worn less often, casual weekends.

The SubC is versatile, its a go-anywhere watch for me.

My 2 cents :)

airchitect · 15 November 2013, 12:07 PM

Nope. Too similar.

vitalsignsrn · 15 November 2013, 03:39 PM

I would say no..they look too identical. One has a cyclops the other a flat crystal…one is thicker, one is thinner… the dots are larger in one, smaller in the other. Really…there isn't enough of a diff for me to think of a 2nd that looks like it. Too many in the Rolex line up to duplicate. ;-)

improviz · 15 November 2013, 03:46 PM

Too much alike, I'd say GMT IIc (or II) for more variety with the SD.

Jake B · 15 November 2013, 03:50 PM

Sure, if you have the means and the desire then why the heck not?

sea-dweller · 15 November 2013, 04:21 PM

I have a 16610, 14060 and a SD. I also once owned a blue 16613 along with these three.
They are all different watches.

amvd · 15 November 2013, 04:50 PM

Absolutely.
There are 2 different watches.
SD is the best ever.
Sub c is the best of this era, new features make the difference like ceramic bezel, maxi dial, luminova color and clasp.
SD is black, then you can add color with Sub, green, blue,TT.

Baselman · 15 November 2013, 05:09 PM

Oh yes great combination The Deep Sea and The Deep Blue

View Poll Results: Sub C and a Sea Dweller in the same collection??
YES	60	48.78%
NO	63	51.22%
Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll

15 November 2013, 12:06 PM	#34
viper9669 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Patrick Location: SIN Watch: Rolex Posts: 5,066	Would you have A Sub C and a Sea Dweller in your Collection Yes or No and why I would vote yes, for variety. They are different, the DSSD is a heftier watch for me thus worn less often, casual weekends. The SubC is versatile, its a go-anywhere watch for me. My 2 cents :)

15 November 2013, 03:46 PM	#37
improviz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Tejas Watch: your step Posts: 2,806	Too much alike, I'd say GMT IIc (or II) for more variety with the SD. __________________ 116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.

15 November 2013, 03:50 PM	#38
Jake B "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: Hong Kong Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN Posts: 2,820	Sure, if you have the means and the desire then why the heck not? __________________ Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

15 November 2013, 11:41 AM	#31
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Would never owe a Sub C.

15 November 2013, 11:55 AM	#32
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	I voted yes, to cover all those times when you need to go deeper than 300m. Seriously, I voted yes because I love Rolex dive watches and I think that when these 2 are together in a collection, they make a great representation of the old and new.

15 November 2013, 11:59 AM	#33
Chainring "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Grand Junction CO Watch: A few, not enough. Posts: 1,725	Me? No. Too many great watches to have two so similiar. If I had everything else I wanted, then sure, of course.

15 November 2013, 12:07 PM	#35
airchitect "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: KY Watch: A few..... Posts: 3,796	Nope. Too similar.

15 November 2013, 03:39 PM	#36
vitalsignsrn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Judy Location: Ontario Watch: 116234 - 14060M Posts: 4,607	I would say no..they look too identical. One has a cyclops the other a flat crystal…one is thicker, one is thinner… the dots are larger in one, smaller in the other. Really…there isn't enough of a diff for me to think of a 2nd that looks like it. Too many in the Rolex line up to duplicate. ;-)

15 November 2013, 04:21 PM	#39
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I have a 16610, 14060 and a SD. I also once owned a blue 16613 along with these three. They are all different watches.

15 November 2013, 04:50 PM	#40
amvd "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Alejandro Location: uruguay Watch: your step! Posts: 430	Absolutely. There are 2 different watches. SD is the best ever. Sub c is the best of this era, new features make the difference like ceramic bezel, maxi dial, luminova color and clasp. SD is black, then you can add color with Sub, green, blue,TT.

15 November 2013, 05:09 PM	#41
Baselman "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Switzerland Watch: 1665 GreatWhite SD Posts: 1,527	Oh yes great combination The Deep Sea and The Deep Blue

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)