The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 January 2014, 09:19 PM   #31
jolimont
"TRF" Member
 
jolimont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
popcorn.jpg

I enjoy these lively discussions
jolimont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:30 PM   #32
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Maxi dial on 14060? Could it be done?

This may help I personally do not think it would fit.
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:35 PM   #33
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
well, it does not look good for me, does it? LOL

As things are, it seems that I have been wrong and I do apologize.

But I still have little hope that the space in the 14060 will be large enough to adopt a significantly larger 114060 * dial and someone will try this sooner or later and give us confirmation.

I did not know that the 14060 dial is smaller than a 16610 dial.
Sorry!

* how much is the difference in mm btw between a 14060 dial and a 114060/16610/116610 dial?
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 January 2014, 09:44 PM   #34
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Maxi dial on 14060? Could it be done?

not my photo 16610
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 January 2014, 09:06 PM   #35
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
well, it does not look good for me, does it? LOL

As things are, it seems that I have been wrong and I do apologize.

But I still have little hope that the space in the 14060 will be large enough to adopt a significantly larger 114060 * dial and someone will try this sooner or later and give us confirmation.

I did not know that the 14060 dial is smaller than a 16610 dial.
Sorry!

* how much is the difference in mm btw between a 14060 dial and a 114060/16610/116610 dial?
Just a fraction over 1mm and now Rolex has made the 114060 the same dial size as the 116610 make sense production wise.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.