|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 June 2014, 06:55 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
How..how does it look??
I wanted to try on the 392 but the store dont carry new pams, since they just took this 90 in...
Please let me know if its too big on me? Does the 392 wears even bigger? Thank you!!  
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:20 AM
|
#2 |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,993
|
It looks fine buddy! just want to give some ideas:
  i'm sure pam 392 will look smaller than pam 90 since they both automatic movement, and pam 90 is 44mm, pam 392 is 42mm. 
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:33 AM
|
#3 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:35 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Looks fine
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:37 AM
|
#5 |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,993
|
Yes buddy! 312 def is bigger and heavier. what you meant older case? 1950 automatic movement case is thick by the way
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:37 AM
|
#6 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:40 AM
|
#7 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 07:51 AM
|
#8 |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,993
|
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 08:13 AM
|
#9 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 08:39 AM
|
#10 | |
|
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,993
|
Quote:
buddy
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 02:30 PM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Looks sharp!
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 03:06 PM
|
#12 | |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
Quote:
Referred to as the Bettarini case. Personally, I find they sit much better on my wrist than the 1950s case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 June 2014, 09:59 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I think the 392 will look great
 Of course you've got to try it to be sure
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
6 June 2014, 01:39 AM
|
#14 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Hulk
Posts: 42
|
You should get whatever sings to you, but I think that the 392 is a great-looking watch. I find it very comfortable on my ~7 inch wrist.
Cheers.  
__________________
Rolex Line-up: 116610 LVc 116710 GMT2c 216570 Exp2 Polar |
|
|
|
|
6 June 2014, 04:21 AM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oslo, Norway
Watch: JLC 1931, AP 15300
Posts: 69
|
Looks very nice, think you will be happy with a 392:)
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
