ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 March 2008, 01:35 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
|
M and Z serial # Subs
I just bought a TT sub 16613 (3.5 weeks ago). I didn't realize there were different models of this until reading all the great info here on TRF. I apologize for what must be a Rolex 101 question but can someone tell me the difference between the Z and the M model? I checked and mine is the Z. Did I buy last year's model or does every year come in both of these models?
Thanks in advance, Norm |
23 March 2008, 01:59 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Julio César
Location: Houston
Watch: Rolex LV
Posts: 321
|
There has been that discussion before. I learn that M and Z series are being made at the same time. M series is the latest, but Rolex still producing z series. Other theory is that Rolex shipped z series together with m series, but m series still being the latest. Here in the forum is said that Rolex has the different parts of the watch ensemble and that is why a z series might have the legend rolexrolex inside. Not all z series has the legend rolexrolex but all m series have them. Does your Z series have the rolexrolex legend inside the dial?
|
23 March 2008, 02:01 PM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
"M" is the latest series of serial numbers that Rolex is producing, but they are probably also still producing "Z" models as well.
Late model "Z" will have the Rolex inscribed rehaut, but early model "M" may not.... Other than that, there is no difference between them...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
23 March 2008, 02:07 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
|
Mine does not have the rolexrolex legend (rolex inscribed rehaut) inside the dial.
|
23 March 2008, 02:12 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Some folks prefer the clean look of the models with a non-etched rehaut..... (I am one of those)...
I'll bet it's a beauty.....how about some pictures..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
23 March 2008, 02:23 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
|
If you look at this link you will see that Rolex do not bring out changes in series to coincide with any calendar year:
http://www.oysterinfo.de/en/detailin...mern/index.php The 'Z' series ceased production shortly after the introduction of the 'M' series which was around August/September 2007. There might have been a production overlap with certain models of high demand, but no more than about 2 or 3 weeks at the most. Shipping consignments to retailers on a global basis probably would have included both Z and M around that time. Rolex dealers throughout the world may have stocks of both series and obviously wish to move the older Z before the M. They can do this by either straight selling to customers or selling in batches to reputable grey watch buyers at a reduced price to clear stock. The grey dealers then sell at their price, still making profit. If I were to buy a brand new Rolex model today from an authorized dealer at MSRP, I would only accept an 'M' series. If the dealer was trying to sell me a Z series watch, I would expect him/her to inform me of this fact, and offer discount because it was NOS (New Old Stock). When intending to pay several thousand dollars for a watch, it is prudent to shop around among AD's. Cheers Steve |
23 March 2008, 02:26 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
|
Thanks. It is a beauty and I love it. I've posted pictures already, albeit poor ones compared to the expert photographers here on TRF but I'll try to get a couple more on tomorrow. Thank you very much for the information.
|
23 March 2008, 02:36 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
|
Steve,
Thank you. While the AD did not disclose this to me he did charge me $7045 which was discounted from the MSRP of $7800 and within one hour of me leaving the store they got notification that the new MSRP price was $9050 so I don't think I did too bad, all things considered. |
23 March 2008, 02:43 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
|
Quote:
|
|
23 March 2008, 08:06 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I agree. Let's see some pics of that beauty!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
23 March 2008, 08:25 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Basically the Sub has changed very little since 1989 sure a very few minor cosmetic changes like non lug holes and IMHO the ridicules chapter ring branding Etc.Suppose the best all round change was the Introduction of the SEL bracelet,but all others very very minor.The most important thing the movement has not changed for almost two decades.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
23 March 2008, 09:48 PM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: LaLa Land
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,757
|
From what I have read on TRF... no biggie! I would not be worried... Just post pics!! :-)
|
23 March 2008, 09:51 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Jay
Location: Here n there
Watch: Sub
Posts: 1,641
|
The chapter ring branding might be the difference, but hey you got it at the old price. Congrats and thank your lucky stars!
|
24 March 2008, 01:50 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: MA
Posts: 414
|
Thank you all. Pics hopefully later today (if I can sneak away from Easter Dinner).
|
24 March 2008, 03:30 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Silverdale
Watch: 16233 & 14060M
Posts: 44
|
So...Do all the "M" variants have the Rolex Branded Rehaut??? In which case, are all the nodate "M" Subs having the COSC inscription on the face as well as the RBR ???
|
24 March 2008, 05:18 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
Quote:
Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
|
24 March 2008, 11:01 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 268
|
My M-serial sub date does not have the inscription. The earliest M watches in the LA area did not have it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.