The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 13 August 2014, 03:05 AM   #1
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
Opinions on a 5512

This is on it's way to me right now. 5512 with 5513 case back. these are the only pics I've received. Is this a MKI fat font insert? It's a 1974 model year with 9315 band, I don't know what end links are on it yet. Lugs appear to be very nice, well the one I can see in the pic is. Does anything stand out as being a problem? Thanks

goldfixer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 03:07 AM   #2
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
It also appears to have a trip lock crown, is this correct for this model?
goldfixer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 04:51 AM   #3
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
Triplock was introduced around 1972. 9315 is the correct bracelet. When you get the watch, place some better photos in this thread - move the hands to a position so all the writing and coronet are clearly visible. Also, list a partial serial number.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:08 AM   #4
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by springer View Post
Triplock was introduced around 1972. 9315 is the correct bracelet. When you get the watch, place some better photos in this thread - move the hands to a position so all the writing and coronet are clearly visible. Also, list a partial serial number.
I will take the movement out and get some good closeups.
goldfixer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:27 AM   #5
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
From what I can see of the dial, it looks like a very nice non serif dial which should be in the correct serial range for a case from 1974. The case looks well preserved judging by the crown guards and the sharp chamfered edge on the second photo you posted.
A partial serial number would be nice, but please don't feel compelled to take the movement out. A shot with the case back off, if you are inclined will suffice.
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:37 AM   #6
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
The seller sent me a shot with the hands moved. Serial # is 3,44X,XXX, which I think should be 1972 not 1974, correct?

goldfixer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:45 AM   #7
Beaumont Miller II
"TRF" Member
 
Beaumont Miller II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
Yes '72
__________________
Beaumont Miller II is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:51 AM   #8
vcnyls
"TRF" Member
 
vcnyls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Josh
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: 1979 Pepsi GMT
Posts: 312
Great looking watch!
vcnyls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:55 AM   #9
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
Gorgeous watch, don't see too many 5512s.
andromeda160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 06:36 AM   #10
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Looks great IMHO
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 06:53 AM   #11
CrownMe
"TRF" Member
 
CrownMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
Wow that is one gorgeous sub. Great patina and insert. Case too. Really everything looks stunning.
CrownMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 07:25 AM   #12
cajuntiger
2024 Pledge Member
 
cajuntiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Who Dat
Location: USA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 1,149
Nice!! Triplock is correct and its a hacking movement...so if your anal like me you can set the watch to the correct second. Absolutely my favorite watch...I have his older brother 3.32x.xxx
cajuntiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 08:17 AM   #13
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
Gorgeous example ..
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 08:31 AM   #14
cajuntiger
2024 Pledge Member
 
cajuntiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Who Dat
Location: USA
Watch: 5512
Posts: 1,149
BTW- That insert is worth a small fortune by itself :)
cajuntiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 08:36 AM   #15
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by cajuntiger View Post
BTW- That insert is worth a small fortune by itself :)
I did a double take when I got the pics of it, I'm very anxious to have it in my hands tomorrow
goldfixer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 08:46 AM   #16
QueueCumber
"TRF" Member
 
QueueCumber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
Is it the angle of the watch, or do the 10 and 20 on the insert look very thin compared to the 30, 40, and 50?
__________________
Instagram: _queuecumber_
QueueCumber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 12:13 PM   #17
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by QueueCumber View Post
Is it the angle of the watch, or do the 10 and 20 on the insert look very thin compared to the 30, 40, and 50?
I'm pretty sure it's the angle.
goldfixer21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 05:03 PM   #18
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Wow. Great score.
Congrats in advanced
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 06:44 PM   #19
PoderEsBueno
"TRF" Member
 
PoderEsBueno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: peb
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 3,145
Beautiful watch Congrats on a great find.
PoderEsBueno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 09:37 PM   #20
RC2
"TRF" Member
 
RC2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by cajuntiger View Post
BTW- That insert is worth a small fortune by itself :)

Kissing 4.
__________________
Rich

Member of Nylon Nation
Red Sox Nation
Instagram watchguy97
RC2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.