The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 January 2015, 01:55 AM   #31
tomcorkery
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom Corkery
Location: westchester ny
Watch: ap ro 15400
Posts: 502
less mag is better to me anyway. To be honest I cant tell a difference
tomcorkery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2015, 04:24 AM   #32
IT Nerd
2024 Pledge Member
 
IT Nerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by CKL1213 View Post
After this someone will tell you, your green is not green enough, not up to the rolex green spec

Never ending OCD

Just enjoy the watch
So true
IT Nerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2015, 04:58 AM   #33
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by gocsan View Post
Really? Looks the same as the one referenced from Rolex website:
No offense, but if you think so why the post..?
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2015, 05:22 AM   #34
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
You definitely do not. My BLNR is way smaller than that. I'm envious.
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2015, 07:02 AM   #35
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by gocsan View Post
Hi all

I know this has been posted many times, but since someone had told me that the cyclops magnification on my LVC is not up to spec, I would like another opinion as I can't see what's wrong with my watch. Is there anything wrong with the magnification?

The comment about the problem is referenced in my video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvZscHWaTY8
Thanks

Looks fine to me. I have seen some really bad ones, and this one looks great if you ask me.
Solo118 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2015, 07:42 AM   #36
sunnyd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: CA
Watch: me watch you
Posts: 461
Looks perfectly normal...enjoy the watch!
__________________
116610LVc
1803 Wideboy
1680 Red MKIV
sunnyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2015, 01:39 PM   #37
engin33r
"TRF" Member
 
engin33r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by gocsan View Post
Here you go, just went forward in time by 22 days:

Here's my 116613LB for comparison



IMO your watch's magnification seems to be fine. If it's too big it'll be a problem too as the projected image will run off the cyclops border if you look at it from an angle.
engin33r is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.