ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 February 2015, 04:40 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: James
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 134
|
Pictures versus IRL... think I found 'the one'
I'm not sure if there are others like me out there, who obsess over these forums, and Rolex's website, and Google images, all in an effort to figure out what to purchase next. I assume there are. I'm still looking for what will be my first Rolex, partly because shopping is half the fun, partly to keep myself motivated towards the end goal of continuing to save a bit here and there for what might be a few years to make the purchase.
I have now visited an AD on three different occasions, and on each occasion I have been suprised at what caught my eye in person versus what I liked best in pictures. Initially I was in love with Air Kings, but on my first visit I found them too small for my liking, at least for my first Rolex, as I think they will have a place in my collection eventually. I gravitated towards the 116710, which surprised me because I didn't really want a black watch. I tried on the 116622 that I found so beautiful in pictures, but it didn't speak to me in person. The next two visits I tried on a datejust, and again the size wasn't really quite right for what I want right now. I tried on a 114060 and found it seemed a bit clunky due to the case design, which was in line with what I thought in pictures. Just my opinion of course, still a beautiful watch. Again I was drawn to the GMT. In pictures I disliked the PCL, thinking they looked off and too blingy. In person they are perfect, because they tied the watch together for me. I love the green second hour hand, and I love the green font. The color really pops in person and breaks up the black on black in a great way. The ceramic bezel can't be described or conveyed in pictures, it is so deep and different depending on the lighting. The PCLs really linked the watch between sport and dress, something very important to me because it will be a long time saving, meaning any other luxury watch will take longer still, so I want a watch that can go with jeans and flip flops, or my dress uniform. It doesn't have to be perfect for both occasions, but I don't want it to be out of place either. I know now, only rom seeing it in person, and feeling it on my wrist, that the 116710 is my goal and will meet my desires for my first Rolex. I wish I had a picture to share, but I was too shy at the dealer to take one. I will say that these watches are too beautiful to really be considered other than in person. A good lesson to have learned for now and later. |
24 February 2015, 05:07 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 113
|
Ttiwwp
|
24 February 2015, 08:09 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: SubC 114060
Posts: 486
|
Good choice but did you also try a blnr? I love the blue black bezel.
|
24 February 2015, 09:16 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
Your methodology cannot be faulted.
Perceptions based on pictures and real life don't always correlate exactly. It does indeed seem like you've found "the one." I think the 116710 is one of the most versatile watches out there and the all black version is my favourite too. Enjoy the chase (as you say, it's half the fun). Keep saving and it'll be all the more satisfying once it's on your wrist. |
24 February 2015, 09:52 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Always best to try on before buying, there are watches you thought you wouldn't like but do in the flesh, such as BLRO and blue YM for me, and vice versa.
|
24 February 2015, 09:56 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow, UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 909
|
You do have to see a watch in person. There are certain watches or dials that photograph really well but in person they don't look as good to me personally and vide versa. I always try to see the watch in person.
|
24 February 2015, 09:58 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,090
|
Agreed, nothing is more important than trying them on
|
24 February 2015, 11:36 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
A fantastic reference!
|
25 February 2015, 12:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
100% agree with your post. You just cannot make a decision about a watch from just pictures.
And the 116710 will be an excellent first...huge fan here. Great looks, functionality, and looks good with anything. |
25 February 2015, 02:06 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
|
Sometimes a picture can not reflect or express the true beauty of a timepiece; so AD visits are a must! Enjoy the hunt!!!
|
25 February 2015, 02:16 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
|
I enjoyed reading your post.
Best of luck in landing your first rollie the 116710. My first was the 16570, it sang to me loud and clear |
25 February 2015, 02:43 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
25 February 2015, 02:46 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
|
|
25 February 2015, 03:19 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: usa
Posts: 318
|
|
25 February 2015, 03:34 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
Watches look huge in pictures and small in person. The details you see so clearly here on TRF may be barely noticeable when the piece is in your hand. For instance the first time I saw the Platinum Daytona, I thought it looked small. The only thing I had to compare it to was 6 inch shots on TRF! Good Luck
|
25 February 2015, 03:47 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 573
|
No question that some pictures just don't do justice.
Perfect example: |
25 February 2015, 04:39 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
25 February 2015, 12:55 PM | #18 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,252
|
I went in to buy a Daytona. Came out with 116710.
I'm still very happy. I agree with your logic. |
25 February 2015, 01:28 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dallas
Watch: 326939bk, 116719
Posts: 253
|
|
25 February 2015, 01:38 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tokyo
Watch: cha talking about?
Posts: 2,919
|
Good luck w your 1st
|
25 February 2015, 03:07 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
The GMT is a fantastic watch! I still miss my 116710
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.