The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 4 April 2015, 09:39 PM   #31
tomallen
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Rolex SubC,GMTIIC
Posts: 966
When I bought my D Blue and SD4K I closed the deal with a standard link thrown in for each. The AD would not budge on a discount for either watch. They are more comfortable without the divers extension.
__________________
Unless you are the lead dog the scenery never changes
tomallen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2015, 12:14 AM   #32
sheldonsmith
2024 Pledge Member
 
sheldonsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,815
My diver's extension is safely stored in the Rolex watch box. No need for it.
__________________
sheldonsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2015, 12:17 AM   #33
damoore
"TRF" Member
 
damoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Central US
Watch: 14060,SD, Pelagos
Posts: 374
Just removed mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
damoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2015, 12:19 AM   #34
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
Who's removed the fliplock from their SD4000?

My dssd never left the AD with it on the watch. It fits so much better without it on there. It centers the clasp nicely on the wrist and makes me wonder what those that say the dssd is not comfortable are feeling.
But what's good for this goose may not be good for the gander.

FWIW my AD had never heard of this either and looked at me a bit sideways when I asked to have it removed. He said he now makes the suggestion to all and has removed it on his personal sd4k and loves it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2015, 12:27 AM   #35
amaninspired
"TRF" Member
 
amaninspired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 383
I was planning on doing this when I get around to buying my 116600 (hopefully in the next few months). I had the same modification performed to my DeepSea without which it simply would not have sat properly on my wrist.
amaninspired is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2015, 12:39 AM   #36
Mfrankel2
"TRF" Member
 
Mfrankel2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Marc
Location: New york
Watch: SD43,d-Blue, 16710
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott1907 View Post
Just took out the fliplock/dive link extension and replaced it with two links, fits much better and the glidelock is more than enough adjustment even if your wearing over a wetsuit.
+1. Did the same with DSSD. I actually prefer to wear the watch under my wetsuit cuff anyway. Pulling back to check the time is fine and it gives me a bit of a cushion should a vicious boat ladder choose to attack. Fit is much better.
Mfrankel2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 April 2015, 12:41 AM   #37
Degas
"TRF" Member
 
Degas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
Who's removed the fliplock from their SD4000?

Left it in its place. Just think it's part of the watch DNA. It doesn't bother me at all on a daily basis and very helpful when diving.
Degas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 01:18 AM   #38
Paoloar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: London
Posts: 22
I have a small wrist and found that the watch fit better and looked nicer without the extension. The bracelet look less elegant if you leave the extension and you have a small wrist since the extension's surface is flat and unlike the other links.
Paoloar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 01:48 AM   #39
Mak2013
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 681
I will remove mine.
It is uncomfortable


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mak2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 01:59 AM   #40
jdpny
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 501
How are you guys going to get the proper fit over your drysuits???
jdpny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 02:46 AM   #41
sgmgolf
"TRF" Member
 
sgmgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: MA
Watch: 16600,16710,Tudor
Posts: 1,372
Scott1907-

I have same wrist size as you. I removed diver ext. link and have 4 links on the 6 side and 6 links on the 12 side. Fit is perfection.

Cheers
sgmgolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 04:29 AM   #42
JoelUlrich
"TRF" Member
 
JoelUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: U.S.
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 89
Yes, I removed mine and the bracelet has a better look and feel now.
JoelUlrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 05:06 AM   #43
swils8610
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swils8610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: shannon
Location: usa
Posts: 9,211
Just removed mine also. Much better.
swils8610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 08:08 AM   #44
damoore
"TRF" Member
 
damoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Central US
Watch: 14060,SD, Pelagos
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdpny View Post
How are you guys going to get the proper fit over your drysuits???

Haha!

Love my dive computer. The watch easily fits over my wet suit for a back up system.

I try to keep my dives max at the 30- 40 meter level 😜


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
damoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 09:29 AM   #45
jdpny
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 501
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdpny View Post
How are you guys going to get the proper fit over your drysuits???

Haha!

Love my dive computer. The watch easily fits over my wet suit for a back up system.

I try to keep my dives max at the 30- 40 meter level ��

:-)
jdpny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 10:21 AM   #46
Lew Archer
"TRF" Member
 
Lew Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
Interesting how so many make this modification. Mine fits quite comfortably, so I never thought to make any change...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Lew Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 April 2015, 10:56 AM   #47
JohnFM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 479
Great thread. Can't believe so many people removed the diver's extension link!

Pictures (before and after) would be really nice ;-)
JohnFM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2015, 06:26 AM   #48
gruffydd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Mine was removed at the same time the bracelet was sized. Sitting in the box, still in its protective plastic wrap. Perfect fit without :)
gruffydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 April 2015, 07:15 AM   #49
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
It seems kind of strange that this would only come out now, since it seems that almost everyone has removed the extension and the watch has been out at least a couple of years.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.