ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

shorty12 · 14 March 2015, 09:00 AM

Hi, I am trying to determine if this is an all genuine rolex gmt 1675 gmt. What do you guys think? Case serial is a 5.8 mil.

RC2 · 14 March 2015, 09:53 AM

Insert is not

magnetized · 14 March 2015, 10:09 AM

hands, insert and date wheel looks like have been replaced ..

TimeToGo · 14 March 2015, 10:42 AM

Insert is fake, as stated above.
Dial appear like an early tritium service replacement dial.
Do the hands glow?"

shorty12 · 14 March 2015, 11:14 AM

I agree on the bezel. That stood right out.

I'll have to check back on the hands because it has been in the dark but they do not seem glow right now.

Would it be possible for the date to be misaligned, as it is, if it is the original correct movement?

springer · 14 March 2015, 01:38 PM

The hands were replaced at some point, or refinished.

shorty12 · 13 April 2015, 06:55 AM

Just an update on this thread to explain why i was asking...

I bought above 1675 on whim while traveling. The seller had an impressive store, and seemed very knowledgable. Once I got it home is when I noticed things didn't look right, and it didn't even look as nice as in the store.

I was told it was all original. 100%. i knew the hands had to have been replaced though, but when I got home i realized the insert was aftermarket and some other parts were at best not period correct.

I was able to get my money back luckily. I just didn't want to post to much online until I did. Even now I'm not going to trash the seller on a forum because he was nice enough to refund my money without any problem.

Lesson learned is do not buy vintage spur of the moment. Stupid decision on my part

but luckily it worked out.

TimeToGo · 13 April 2015, 07:31 AM

Great all worked out!

14 March 2015, 09:00 AM	#1
shorty12 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: USA Posts: 140	Authentic 1675? Hi, I am trying to determine if this is an all genuine rolex gmt 1675 gmt. What do you guys think? Case serial is a 5.8 mil. Attached Images

14 March 2015, 09:53 AM	#2
RC2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Rich Location: NC Watch: Rolex 1675 Posts: 2,359	Insert is not __________________ Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97

14 March 2015, 01:38 PM	#6
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	The hands were replaced at some point, or refinished. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

14 March 2015, 10:09 AM	#3
magnetized "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Jeff Location: Los Angeles CA. Watch: aHolic Posts: 331	hands, insert and date wheel looks like have been replaced ..

14 March 2015, 10:42 AM	#4
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	Insert is fake, as stated above. Dial appear like an early tritium service replacement dial. Do the hands glow?"

14 March 2015, 11:14 AM	#5
shorty12 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: USA Posts: 140	I agree on the bezel. That stood right out. I'll have to check back on the hands because it has been in the dark but they do not seem glow right now. Would it be possible for the date to be misaligned, as it is, if it is the original correct movement?

13 April 2015, 06:55 AM	#7
shorty12 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: USA Posts: 140	Just an update on this thread to explain why i was asking... I bought above 1675 on whim while traveling. The seller had an impressive store, and seemed very knowledgable. Once I got it home is when I noticed things didn't look right, and it didn't even look as nice as in the store. I was told it was all original. 100%. i knew the hands had to have been replaced though, but when I got home i realized the insert was aftermarket and some other parts were at best not period correct. I was able to get my money back luckily. I just didn't want to post to much online until I did. Even now I'm not going to trash the seller on a forum because he was nice enough to refund my money without any problem. Lesson learned is do not buy vintage spur of the moment. Stupid decision on my part but luckily it worked out.

13 April 2015, 07:31 AM	#8
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,736	Great all worked out!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)