ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 April 2015, 06:20 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Belgium
Posts: 60
|
1675/3 from 1974: your thoughts....
Hello everyone.
Most of the time lurker, but this time I'd like to have your thoughts. I have the project to get a vintage GMT. I especially fancy the "tiger eye" two tone GMT. I found this one not far away from my place so I can have a chance to inspect it in person. I don't have the SN yet but looked on oyster info to have a idea, so this shouldn't be much of a problem on that side. But I'd like to have some external opinons on the general state of the item. (patina matching, lugs state, dial,.....). Doesn't seem bad to me, but I don't have the experience most of you have. So, here it is. Thanks in advance for your time. Note: any link to external info sources would also be much appreciated. Oli [IMG][/IMG] |
15 April 2015, 12:13 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
That appears to be a particularly nice 1675/3 GMT Master. If the price is reasonable given the quality and you have the funds, you should buy it. Before someone else does.
Michael |
15 April 2015, 05:12 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
Looks good. Just sold my 1970 and it was virtually the same. The insert looks great.
|
16 April 2015, 11:33 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,664
|
Looks nice
|
16 April 2015, 11:53 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
|
Looks nice. Hard for me to tell the kind of dial - should be matte brown for that year I think
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 April 2015, 03:55 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Belgium
Posts: 60
|
Hi all,
thanks already for these feedbacks. I had the opportunity to test it. Here are some more pics for you to comment. Dial looked to me matte brown indeed. Hands and lime dots match (to me). Lugs not over polished, bevels are visible. The only thing is the lug at 7 o'clock that has been reworked. Seller showed it to me right away. Seemed to be done in a good manner with bevel redone. P/N legible between the lugs. S/N 41xxxxx which according to oyster info is in the range, but at the end. The jubilee was too large for me to mean anything but looked "wearable". Leather strap is included. Crown has the line under the Rolex sign, which sounds ok. Hands show a bit of oxydation. Price is a bit shy of 6000€..... hum [url=https://flic.kr/p/s7U6S9] |
17 April 2015, 11:36 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,417
|
Very nice! Live the bezel
|
19 April 2015, 12:38 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
|
You can find cheaper ones, but you will search for a very long time trying to find a better dial & hand combination.
|
19 April 2015, 05:57 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
That lug would kill it for me.
__________________
|
19 April 2015, 09:46 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 149
|
Love it- personally lug wouldn't bother me.
|
19 April 2015, 11:55 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
Sadly, I agree. Sure, these old vintage watches often get polished, and I can live with that sometimes, as long as the lugs are even. That lower left lug looks about half as thick as the other side. Otherwise, beautiful watch, although the bevels are a little big on the other lugs. Some guys love that, though.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.