The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 18 April 2015, 07:18 PM   #1
stvn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Is this dial original? Thank you

Hi Guys,
Can someone please confirm if this dial and ring is original to a 1968 5513 submariner?
Should 'Submariner' come below the numbers and not above?



Thank you very much.
stvn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2015, 09:04 PM   #2
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
Dial is a later one, I believe it's a Maxi dial from the late 70's
andromeda160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2015, 12:30 AM   #3
stvn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Thannk you.

Cheers Greg.
The search goes on.
stvn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2015, 12:38 AM   #4
stvn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 16
5513 - Help please?



Does this 1963 5513 look correct?
My gut decision is yes, but I need expert advice?
Thank you :)
stvn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2015, 01:30 AM   #5
watchcrank
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: michael
Location: Florida
Watch: explorer II cream
Posts: 1,664
63 should be gilt dial.
watchcrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2015, 09:06 PM   #6
andromeda160
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by stvn View Post


Does this 1963 5513 look correct?
My gut decision is yes, but I need expert advice?
Thank you :)
watchcrank is right, a 63 would be Gilt dialed, but this one isn't a 63 as it doesn't have pointed crown guards. what are the first 4 digits of the SN? should date from like 66-69 i'd imagine.
andromeda160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2015, 12:02 AM   #7
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by stvn View Post
Hi Guys,
Can someone please confirm if this dial and ring is original to a 1968 5513 submariner?
Should 'Submariner' come below the numbers and not above?



Thank you very much.
I actually love the look of this watch. Yes, the dial and hands were changed at service at some point, but that patina and bezel insert are beautiful. Nothing wrong with correctly replaced Rolex parts, as long as the price reflects that, of course. Good luck in your search.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2015, 07:00 AM   #8
Mark020
"TRF" Member
 
Mark020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
Might be the pics bit the lume looks glued on the dial to say so.
Mark020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 02:29 PM   #9
The_Walrus
"TRF" Member
 
The_Walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark020 View Post
Might be the pics bit the lume looks glued on the dial to say so.
Well spotted Mark.
The lume seems to cast a shadow
The_Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 03:47 PM   #10
Jiggo
"TRF" Member
 
Jiggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: "A"
Location: Bangkok
Watch: 5512/5513
Posts: 176
WRONG dial for sure!!!
Jiggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 11:21 PM   #11
stvn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark020 View Post
Might be the pics bit the lume looks glued on the dial to say so.
I never noticed this but you are right!
stvn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2015, 11:49 PM   #12
jdmi32
"TRF" Member
 
jdmi32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
Dial on the first watch does look strange. It's a MK5 which dates it to the early 80's. And aside from the strange shadows that others have noted, some of the hour plots actually touch the hash marks, which occurs only with the MK3 dial. Printing on the crown looks strange too. If i had to guess I'd say the dial has been redone.
jdmi32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2015, 01:36 AM   #13
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Check out our very own John's site. Extremely helpful

http://www.5513mattedial.com/
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2015, 02:47 AM   #14
Wing Zero
"TRF" Member
 
Wing Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: JC
Location: Earth
Watch: 1680 ~ 16610LV
Posts: 811
Where are you getting these dates from?

The serial number?
The date stamp on the caseback?
The seller?

The Serial number must match the caseback stamp which must match the dial....
The insert, hands, crown is nice to have matching but not necessary to make the watch "Correct"
__________________
************************

************************
Wing Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.