With much trepidation...

[lhanddds]

Originally Posted by buenosdias

Hi Larry,



1. of all congrats



...but let me play the little devil....



You'll love it the first days.....then you'll think about the 42mm, then about the weight, then about that it's a bad remake of the real ExplorerII the 1655....

You'll see that the hands are to big, the bezel too small, the bracelet is toooo perfect, the case is too thick...........you'll put your 1680 or your 1675 on your wrist and think: PERFECT!



Why do I write this? I DID THE SAME



Bought a 216570 BD in 2/2013....had it on my wrist let's say 10-14 times since then.

Had it never on my wrist longer than just 1 day!!!....and it went back in the box.



Love seeing it on pictures and on other wrists but.......it gets NO wrist time since many many month.

If you are addicted to those fu#*ing old lovely references, the new ones have nearly no chance! That's my opinion.....

Had a 116710LN loved it! It was too perfect, sold it after 1 year. Case too fat, bracelet too shiny/bling.....Had many times 116610, 114060...on my wrist...but not a long time:-)



For me the 216570 is a beautiful foto model!

Here's a example of mine...











To answer your question:

I own a 216570 BD that I don't wear :-(



My choice of "new" Rolex is to find in the 5 digit references.



My all time favourites are the 16610 LV (but as a LN) and the 16600 (on nato straps on sometimes on oyster)....Perfect proportions IMHO



PLEASE DON'T HATE ME AND DON'T TAKE IT PERSONAL



May be it will not be the same with your 216570 WD ;-)



ALL THE BEST, Sebastian

As the title says Sebastian, "With much trepidation" Meaning I was very guarded about this. It's not like it's a very expensive experiment if it doesn't work out. It's probably my best shot with the most recent offerings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[lhanddds]

Originally Posted by Jason71

I will be interested to know what you think over a longer period of time. It is the size that is the only drawback for me. I love the look of it, and would probably buy one if I thought I wouldn't tire of the size.



Keep us posted

Alright Jason, so you're so skinny now 42 mm is too big.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Jason71]

Originally Posted by lhanddds

Alright Jason, so you're so skinny now 42 mm is too big.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol. Thin......thick....it's a fluctuating thing.

[buenosdias]

Originally Posted by lhanddds

As the title says Sebastian, "With much trepidation" Meaning I was very guarded about this. It's not like it's a very expensive experiment if it doesn't work out. It's probably my best shot with the most recent offerings.

Just kidding Larry ;-)

I've got a good mate who collects many vintage watches.
One day we met I bought a 1675 gilt from him and had the 216570 on my wrist.
I told him that every time I wear this 216570 I like it more......he laughed...:-) Then he said.......let me play the little devil......

For me personal I can say: He was right!
I know the "risk"$$$ is not high and I hope it will not be the same....

Enjoy your new beauty

[lhanddds]

Thanks Seb, all in fun, I get it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rdragon]

OP - I saw you post in WRUW today your 216570 polar on strap. Looks great. Mind if I ask you a couple questions?

- What size wrist do you have?
- And wanted to follow up on this thread and see how this experiment is working out?

[Andy57]

I think the 216570 Polar is the best Explorer 2, period. It's a stunning watch. I hope you enjoy it in good health!

[Toolguy]

Congrats its a beautiful piece...wait 10 years and it will be a vintage piece after the next reference change

[iclick]

I bought my first modern Rolex about two years ago, a 10-YO SS Daytona. It's an impressive watch but almost never wear it, as I'm afraid I'll scratch something--like the PCLs, polished case, etc. Call me a wimp--I can take it. The truth is that I don't think I'm cut out for the modern stuff.

I rotate my three Tudors regularly, moving the two Rolexes in the queue only rarely. The Daytona sits in the safe most of the time for the aforementioned reasons and the GMT because it is my first Rolex that I bought almost 45 years ago. The GMT has immense nostalgic value, will always be my favorite, and for the first 35 years I wore it with almost total abandon, rarely removing it from my wrist. Nowadays it gets special treatment, sort of like you would give a precious family heirloom. That's because it is one.

My favorite daily wearer is the Tudor Sub, only because it is so easy to read compared to the chronos, followed by the 79170 and 79180. The upside to the Big Blocks is their impressive wrist presence, as they are really a kick to wear.

[lhanddds]

Originally Posted by rdragon

OP - I saw you post in WRUW today your 216570 polar on strap. Looks great. Mind if I ask you a couple questions?



- What size wrist do you have?

- And wanted to follow up on this thread and see how this experiment is working out?

Well, this is interesting. First my wrist is between 7.25 and 7.5 depending where and how tight you are pulling. After today when I got home the Exp II went right back in the safe and I put a vintage on. I like having a modern watch but the bling and sapphire are a turnoff for me. The warmth of plexi can't be beat and I love the individual look of each vintage watch. I have been thinking of selling or trading the Exp II but nothing has pushed me to it yet. I keep anticipating the release of a SS Daytona. That would really get my attention if it's done right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rdragon]

Originally Posted by lhanddds

Well, this is interesting. First my wrist is between 7.25 and 7.5 depending where and how tight you are pulling. After today when I got home the Exp II went right back in the safe and I put a vintage on. I like having a modern watch but the bling and sapphire are a turnoff for me. The warmth of plexi can't be beat and I love the individual look of each vintage watch. I have been thinking of selling or trading the Exp II but nothing has pushed me to it yet. I keep anticipating the release of a SS Daytona. That would really get my attention if it's done right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the info. It looks good on your wrist, will be big on mine then. I haven't ventured into older than 5 digit references yet, but definitely enjoy the size/shape of the 5 digit models. Helpful to hear you haven't completely warmed up to the modern ones.

[Frogman4me]

Congrats Larry! Looks great on your wrist. As long as most of your collection is vintage you won't hear a peep from me enjoy my friend.

[lhanddds]

Originally Posted by Frogman4me

Congrats Larry! Looks great on your wrist. As long as most of your collection is vintage you won't hear a peep from me enjoy my friend.

[Frosty]

Originally Posted by lhanddds

The size is the most difficult part for me Jason. In fact, I also notice the weight over my comfy vintages. It has a lower profile so that it sits pretty well on the wrist. I still think you can't beat vintage.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great Watch!

I know what you mean, Larry. I really like my Milgauss GV. However, in the morning, I always grab my GMT 1675 on a Jubilee bracelet. It is so comfortable. There is also something about the matte dial that I really enjoy.

[lhanddds]

You get it my friend 👍


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk