ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 February 2016, 12:41 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
|
Exp. II
__________________
|
14 February 2016, 12:43 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Quote:
This exactly. Go with what you want and not what others like or seems to be popular at the moment. Both are fantastic watches but if you like the Explorer II go for it! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
|
14 February 2016, 01:11 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,671
|
I'm not big in the BLNR. To me it's not worth the premium. the ExII is $2-$2.5k less than the BLNR with no added features other than the rotating bezel.
Plus with your Sub in the lineup, the GMT Master is too similar. The ExII brings in some color. |
14 February 2016, 01:11 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
|
Sounds like you want an Explorer II... Only reason I would choose a GMT is because the rotatable bezel makes time changes quick especially when traveling. I never use the regular hands when I'm in lay overs, I use the GMT hands since they are short and temporary stops. But if you have no need for uses like that, then no reason to choose something you like less.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 February 2016, 01:15 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
|
Im a big fan of the GMT, what about a Pepsi? 16710... Otherwise an Explorer ll polar but 16570... 40mm. That's my opinion.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 February 2016, 01:25 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
|
14 February 2016, 01:41 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
Congrats on the BLNR. I would have gone with the ExpII given what you already have, but the heart wants what the heart wants.
|
14 February 2016, 02:27 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Michael
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,730
|
Like I said in my previous post, I also would have chosen the BLNR. Congrats.
|
14 February 2016, 02:53 AM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
I picked up the BLNR last week and love it thats what I would recommend you will love it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.