The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 May 2016, 09:27 PM   #1
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
No More Watches > 40mm For Me.......

My New Year's resolution was to sell any watch that I owned that was larger than 40mm. In the last 2 weeks, I have completed the sales of these 3 watches. I could 'wear' them, and IMHO they didn't look ridiculously large. However, I just didn't find them to be as comfortable as my smaller diameter watches. Therefore, it was a good time to be on the chopping block. Unless my wrist grows significantly in the next several years, I have vowed to not buy anything that is larger than 40mm. Anyone else feel this way??





borrowed pic (because evidently I even deleted all pics of this watch)
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 09:31 PM   #2
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
I find that the flat-back comfort of the BB outweighs its slightly larger dimensions. Still, it's good to shift watches that don't work for you
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 09:36 PM   #3
Wing-Co
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Germany
Watch: Day Date 40mm WG
Posts: 573
Just got rid of the DSSD and YM II for a 40mm DD for the same reasons.
Wing-Co is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 09:48 PM   #4
leftnose
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 110
To me, 40-42 is the sweet spot depending on the design of the watch. I have a big wrist and can wear larger watches without issue and I own a few as well but they don't look "right" to me.
leftnose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 09:53 PM   #5
ltmgeller
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ltmgeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,591
The exact opposite for me. I feel 40mm is just on the cusp of being too small. I'm ok with the ceramics but find myself all but ignoring my 5 digit 40mm pieces. I'm also a big guy so that makes a difference as well. To each their own.
__________________
Oh, look at the time...
Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019
ltmgeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 09:55 PM   #6
fmc000
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
I absolutely agree with the OP. In the past few years I sold all my Breitling watches and all my Seiko divers because of the size. I really don't see myself wearing anything bigger than my Daytona in the foreseeable future.
fmc000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 10:34 PM   #7
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
My favorite watch is 39mm so I understand but not sure I'd have done this.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 10:48 PM   #8
busytimmy
"TRF" Member
 
busytimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
Yep, I'm 100% with you, Mr H. I do have one exception (hesalite speedy pro), however all of my other watches are 40mm or smaller.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
busytimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 10:53 PM   #9
slorollin
"TRF" Member
 
slorollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NC
Watch: yer pints & quarts
Posts: 372
42 is my number. I feel the same way. I'm a big guy, but I can't get used to the big watches. It feels like I have a lunch box on my wrist. That's why they make different sizes I guess.
No watches over 42mm, no cigars over 50 ring ga.
__________________
"The great Confucius said that he would
rather be a profound political economist than chief of police." S. Clemens
slorollin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 11:00 PM   #10
rollerballer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: SS
Posts: 137
I use to like big watches, but after awhile, it feels a little flashy.
rollerballer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 11:07 PM   #11
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I liked big, then I liked small, now I like big and small as I need some variation in my collection to stop me from buying and selling in eternity.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 11:07 PM   #12
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,308
nope. i wear watches that i like, not millimeters. if it happens to be 36, 40 or 44, so be it.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 11:15 PM   #13
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
Doesn't it depend on the watch? For instance the 40mm Submariner 'wears' quite a lot larger than a Day-Date 40. A 44mm Portugeiser can be slim enough to get away with it. The overall design seems to be key.
Having said all that, 38-40mm is probably optimum for me. It's not just about the size of wrist, big watches can all too easily look very 'showy.' Perhaps that is the intention.
For instance, a Panerei tends to look slightly comic to me....but obviously not to a lot of fans.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 11:15 PM   #14
Sublovin
2024 Pledge Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,595
I have found that simply looking at case size doesn't tell the whole story. Many watches wear larger or smaller depending on thickness, lug length etc.
I have watches from the low 30's up to 48mm...I like the variety
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2016, 11:51 PM   #15
Vinyasa
"TRF" Member
 
Vinyasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: Maine
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 1,396
In principle, I agree. My only exception was the Omega Speedy (42mm), which I did flip, but because I no longer valued a chonograph function. That watch felt very comfortable.

I rediscovered my love for the 5-digit models... a little smaller and svelte compared to many current 6-digits. I think my sweet spot is 38-40mm.
Vinyasa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:09 AM   #16
captain_NEMO
"TRF" Member
 
captain_NEMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jansky
Location: Midwest
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
My New Year's resolution was to sell any watch that I owned that was larger than 40mm. In the last 2 weeks, I have completed the sales of these 3 watches. I could 'wear' them, and IMHO they didn't look ridiculously large. However, I just didn't find them to be as comfortable as my smaller diameter watches. Therefore, it was a good time to be on the chopping block. Unless my wrist grows significantly in the next several years, I have vowed to not buy anything that is larger than 40mm. Anyone else feel this way??

I, too, don't see the fascination with larger watches. Unfortunately, the trend is getting bigger and bigger. I think big, hulking watches look silly in smaller/shorter people, not to mention ostentatious. I get avant-garde and panache, but it's lost when watches are worn so that the people on the other side of the bar can tell both the brand and the time.

I do, however, weep for the loss of your Tudor BB. I would've kept that in the barn no matter what.



Quote:
Originally Posted by busytimmy View Post
Yep, I'm 100% with you, Mr H. I do have one exception (hesalite speedy pro), however all of my other watches are 40mm or smaller.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With you all the way, Tim. Mmmmm...Speedy pro. That is my grail at the moment, and is probably my next buy real soon. It's so g-damn gorgeous, I just want to eat it!! Not sure if I should chase my birth-year or just spring for a new one. Decisions, decisions.
captain_NEMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:16 AM   #17
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
SMP is the only over 40 watch I care for.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:17 AM   #18
Trailblazer
"TRF" Member
 
Trailblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
sobering moments aye? I also went through that and sold my Pam 372 and dssd, now keeping to 40mm and below, I got no regrets.
Trailblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:28 AM   #19
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
To me there are so many variables in addition to the diameter that it's hard to say. Generally speaking I think 40-42mm is the sweet spot for sports watches. In addition to the watch I think the size of the wearer is important to consider too. At 6' 185 pounds my 42mm Explorer 2 fits nicely, but it is about as big as I would go.
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:30 AM   #20
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
Do you know how to tell if it is time to sell a watch?? Not only do I NOT weep the sale of these 3 watches, but I am glad to see them go, and I am relieved to have them off my back. I don't miss any of the 3 of them AT ALL.

Do you know how it is NOT the time to sell a watch?? I pulled my BLNR out of the safe yesterday.....thinking of taking some pics of it to place it up for sale......I just couldn't do it. I started having heart palpitations, and only felt relief when it went back in the safe.


Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
My favorite watch is 39mm so I understand but not sure I'd have done this.
Mike, there is a method to my madness, and I do have a plan
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:31 AM   #21
sickened1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
I have vowed to not buy anything that is larger than 40mm. Anyone else feel this way??
Yup, 40mm is the biggest I'll go... well, maybe there's an exception for Tudor Black Bay since it's 41mm.
sickened1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:35 AM   #22
mineral
"TRF" Member
 
mineral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
I totally agreed with you

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason71 View Post
Do you know how to tell if it is time to sell a watch?? Not only do I NOT weep the sale of these 3 watches, but I am glad to see them go, and I am relieved to have them off my back. I don't miss any of the 3 of them AT ALL.

Do you know how it is NOT the time to sell a watch?? I pulled my BLNR out of the safe yesterday.....thinking of taking some pics of it to place it up for sale......I just couldn't do it. I started having heart palpitations, and only felt relief when it went back in the safe.




Mike, there is a method to my madness, and I do have a plan
I owned Panerai and IWC which are larger than 40mm and sold them all after few months. I find them too thick and heavy. Glad that now I even enjoy the 34mm vintage Rolex or Tudor.
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight
mineral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:36 AM   #23
GoingPlaces
"TRF" Member
 
GoingPlaces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,356
Not sure about an "absolute" limit, but I feel similar. 44 would never work for me as it might on others. I've seen some watches that had no place on certain wrists, looked really out of proportion. Depends on the piece.
GoingPlaces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:36 AM   #24
Tamzi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5
Well, having a small wrist means I really can't pull off anything larger than 40mm. Also, anything >40mm at my age (20) kind of shouts out 'look at me', which I am not really into.
Tamzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:38 AM   #25
Spartacus
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: DC
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 2,745
I'm on the other side of 40mm. 40mm is the lowest I'll go.

I think it all depends on your point of reference. If you are a true old school submariner guy (Jason71), then yes, it makes sense. For others, their point of reference may be at 41, 42, and maybe even 44mm with watches like a Speedmaster ,Panerai XXX, IWC Pilot, etc.
Spartacus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:41 AM   #26
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
I am feeling the same way. I have barely worn my AP ROO or Panerai this year. The rolex president, GMT, and Daytona get the most wrist time now a days. Not sure if i would sell the bigger watches though.
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:44 AM   #27
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
I understand EXACTLY what you are saying. My journey started with 45 to 50mm watches and sometimes even larger. I would not even look to buy anything under 45mm. I had Doxa's,Omega's and a few Oris's loved them so I thought. My wife said I looked like a clown wearing those big watches what does she know I thought then I started going a little smaller bought a 44mm IWC Aquatimer loved it for a while then it stated feeling to big. So here I am now with the 40mm Rolexes and love them BLNR and Sub-C can't get enough. I tried the DSSD love the look but just to big for me IMPO. I have an 8+ inch wrist and a 40mm Rolex is all I need to scratch my watch itch.
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 12:47 AM   #28
Daytona88
2024 Pledge Member
 
Daytona88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,623
40 is about as big as I can go on Rolex but I still can wear my 42mm speedy and my 41mm Tudor Ranger.
Daytona88 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 01:21 AM   #29
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
My only larger Rolex was the 42mm EXPII that I ultimately flipped for a 40mm GMTII-C. That's now my upper size limit for my 6.5" wrist.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2016, 01:21 AM   #30
Steve36Efc
"TRF" Member
 
Steve36Efc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
I have a 44mm Seamaster regatta that is just uncomfortable to wear for extended periods. I just can't get the bracelet adjusted right, I think it could do with something like a glide lock. I'm sure I wouldn't have an issue with a DSSD.
Steve36Efc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.