ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 May 2016, 09:27 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
No More Watches > 40mm For Me.......
My New Year's resolution was to sell any watch that I owned that was larger than 40mm. In the last 2 weeks, I have completed the sales of these 3 watches. I could 'wear' them, and IMHO they didn't look ridiculously large. However, I just didn't find them to be as comfortable as my smaller diameter watches. Therefore, it was a good time to be on the chopping block. Unless my wrist grows significantly in the next several years, I have vowed to not buy anything that is larger than 40mm. Anyone else feel this way??
borrowed pic (because evidently I even deleted all pics of this watch)
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
2 May 2016, 09:31 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
I find that the flat-back comfort of the BB outweighs its slightly larger dimensions. Still, it's good to shift watches that don't work for you
|
2 May 2016, 09:36 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Germany
Watch: Day Date 40mm WG
Posts: 573
|
Just got rid of the DSSD and YM II for a 40mm DD for the same reasons.
|
2 May 2016, 09:48 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 110
|
To me, 40-42 is the sweet spot depending on the design of the watch. I have a big wrist and can wear larger watches without issue and I own a few as well but they don't look "right" to me.
|
2 May 2016, 09:53 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,591
|
The exact opposite for me. I feel 40mm is just on the cusp of being too small. I'm ok with the ceramics but find myself all but ignoring my 5 digit 40mm pieces. I'm also a big guy so that makes a difference as well. To each their own.
__________________
Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
2 May 2016, 09:55 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Fabio
Location: Como - Italy
Posts: 4,811
|
I absolutely agree with the OP. In the past few years I sold all my Breitling watches and all my Seiko divers because of the size. I really don't see myself wearing anything bigger than my Daytona in the foreseeable future.
|
2 May 2016, 10:34 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
My favorite watch is 39mm so I understand but not sure I'd have done this.
|
2 May 2016, 10:48 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
Yep, I'm 100% with you, Mr H. I do have one exception (hesalite speedy pro), however all of my other watches are 40mm or smaller.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 May 2016, 10:53 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NC
Watch: yer pints & quarts
Posts: 372
|
42 is my number. I feel the same way. I'm a big guy, but I can't get used to the big watches. It feels like I have a lunch box on my wrist. That's why they make different sizes I guess.
No watches over 42mm, no cigars over 50 ring ga.
__________________
"The great Confucius said that he would rather be a profound political economist than chief of police." S. Clemens |
2 May 2016, 11:00 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: SS
Posts: 137
|
I use to like big watches, but after awhile, it feels a little flashy.
|
2 May 2016, 11:07 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I liked big, then I liked small, now I like big and small as I need some variation in my collection to stop me from buying and selling in eternity.
|
2 May 2016, 11:07 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,307
|
nope. i wear watches that i like, not millimeters. if it happens to be 36, 40 or 44, so be it.
|
2 May 2016, 11:15 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
|
Doesn't it depend on the watch? For instance the 40mm Submariner 'wears' quite a lot larger than a Day-Date 40. A 44mm Portugeiser can be slim enough to get away with it. The overall design seems to be key.
Having said all that, 38-40mm is probably optimum for me. It's not just about the size of wrist, big watches can all too easily look very 'showy.' Perhaps that is the intention. For instance, a Panerei tends to look slightly comic to me....but obviously not to a lot of fans. |
2 May 2016, 11:15 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,595
|
I have found that simply looking at case size doesn't tell the whole story. Many watches wear larger or smaller depending on thickness, lug length etc.
I have watches from the low 30's up to 48mm...I like the variety |
2 May 2016, 11:51 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: Maine
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 1,396
|
In principle, I agree. My only exception was the Omega Speedy (42mm), which I did flip, but because I no longer valued a chonograph function. That watch felt very comfortable.
I rediscovered my love for the 5-digit models... a little smaller and svelte compared to many current 6-digits. I think my sweet spot is 38-40mm. |
3 May 2016, 12:09 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Real Name: Jansky
Location: Midwest
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 610
|
Quote:
I, too, don't see the fascination with larger watches. Unfortunately, the trend is getting bigger and bigger. I think big, hulking watches look silly in smaller/shorter people, not to mention ostentatious. I get avant-garde and panache, but it's lost when watches are worn so that the people on the other side of the bar can tell both the brand and the time. I do, however, weep for the loss of your Tudor BB. I would've kept that in the barn no matter what. With you all the way, Tim. Mmmmm...Speedy pro. That is my grail at the moment, and is probably my next buy real soon. It's so g-damn gorgeous, I just want to eat it!! Not sure if I should chase my birth-year or just spring for a new one. Decisions, decisions. |
|
3 May 2016, 12:16 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
SMP is the only over 40 watch I care for.
|
3 May 2016, 12:17 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
|
sobering moments aye? I also went through that and sold my Pam 372 and dssd, now keeping to 40mm and below, I got no regrets.
|
3 May 2016, 12:28 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
|
To me there are so many variables in addition to the diameter that it's hard to say. Generally speaking I think 40-42mm is the sweet spot for sports watches. In addition to the watch I think the size of the wearer is important to consider too. At 6' 185 pounds my 42mm Explorer 2 fits nicely, but it is about as big as I would go.
|
3 May 2016, 12:30 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Do you know how to tell if it is time to sell a watch?? Not only do I NOT weep the sale of these 3 watches, but I am glad to see them go, and I am relieved to have them off my back. I don't miss any of the 3 of them AT ALL.
Do you know how it is NOT the time to sell a watch?? I pulled my BLNR out of the safe yesterday.....thinking of taking some pics of it to place it up for sale......I just couldn't do it. I started having heart palpitations, and only felt relief when it went back in the safe. Mike, there is a method to my madness, and I do have a plan
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
3 May 2016, 12:31 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
|
3 May 2016, 12:35 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
|
I totally agreed with you
Quote:
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight |
|
3 May 2016, 12:36 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,356
|
Not sure about an "absolute" limit, but I feel similar. 44 would never work for me as it might on others. I've seen some watches that had no place on certain wrists, looked really out of proportion. Depends on the piece.
|
3 May 2016, 12:36 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5
|
Well, having a small wrist means I really can't pull off anything larger than 40mm. Also, anything >40mm at my age (20) kind of shouts out 'look at me', which I am not really into.
|
3 May 2016, 12:38 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: DC
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 2,745
|
I'm on the other side of 40mm. 40mm is the lowest I'll go.
I think it all depends on your point of reference. If you are a true old school submariner guy (Jason71), then yes, it makes sense. For others, their point of reference may be at 41, 42, and maybe even 44mm with watches like a Speedmaster ,Panerai XXX, IWC Pilot, etc. |
3 May 2016, 12:41 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
I am feeling the same way. I have barely worn my AP ROO or Panerai this year. The rolex president, GMT, and Daytona get the most wrist time now a days. Not sure if i would sell the bigger watches though.
|
3 May 2016, 12:44 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
I understand EXACTLY what you are saying. My journey started with 45 to 50mm watches and sometimes even larger. I would not even look to buy anything under 45mm. I had Doxa's,Omega's and a few Oris's loved them so I thought. My wife said I looked like a clown wearing those big watches what does she know I thought then I started going a little smaller bought a 44mm IWC Aquatimer loved it for a while then it stated feeling to big. So here I am now with the 40mm Rolexes and love them BLNR and Sub-C can't get enough. I tried the DSSD love the look but just to big for me IMPO. I have an 8+ inch wrist and a 40mm Rolex is all I need to scratch my watch itch.
|
3 May 2016, 12:47 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,623
|
40 is about as big as I can go on Rolex but I still can wear my 42mm speedy and my 41mm Tudor Ranger.
|
3 May 2016, 01:21 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
My only larger Rolex was the 42mm EXPII that I ultimately flipped for a 40mm GMTII-C. That's now my upper size limit for my 6.5" wrist.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
3 May 2016, 01:21 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
|
I have a 44mm Seamaster regatta that is just uncomfortable to wear for extended periods. I just can't get the bracelet adjusted right, I think it could do with something like a glide lock. I'm sure I wouldn't have an issue with a DSSD.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.