ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 July 2008, 03:33 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Greg Merrick
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 648
|
__________________
Gregory |
29 July 2008, 03:41 AM | #32 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
My wrists are kind of small, so a 44 looks just plain silly on me. |
|
29 July 2008, 03:44 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,942
|
You'll appreciate knowing that three of the saleswomen at the Panerai/Cartier/Chopard AD in our city wear 44mm Panerais...and they look great.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
29 July 2008, 03:45 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
40mm is max for me. Even the 42mm PO seems too large for my wrists.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
29 July 2008, 04:11 AM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
|
|
29 July 2008, 04:13 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Greg Merrick
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 648
|
That's an interesting observation and I can believe it, but what looks great on a woman has very little to do with what looks good on a man. It's not just a different aesthetic; the intention, the context and the meaning are different.
__________________
Gregory |
29 July 2008, 04:40 AM | #37 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
|
Quote:
Quote:
When I first strapped on a Rolex (16610), I had a kind of Road House moment: "You know, I really thought you'd be bigger." It seemed small--at least, smaller than expected. Then, after wearing it for a few weeks, it felt like the perfect size. Now and then I'll strap on my Marathon SAR for a while, which is the same diameter as my Sub but has a giant milled steel bezel. It feels giant, and then when I go back to my Sub, it feels smaller than before. It's all relative. That being said, there is an objectively "better" size and weight--at least for each person. My Sub is almost too heavy for running, hiking, etc. It slides around on my wrist; the Explorer-II, or the Sub on a NATO, feels better when I'm being really active. I also agree that a bigger watch is more likely to get knocked on stuff. Seems like I was always banging my SAR on doorways, but almost never my Sub.
__________________
16610 Submariner Date; D Serial 16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial 16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial |
||
29 July 2008, 04:59 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
|
Quote:
That look would not work for me. It looks faddish: like some kind of oversized bracelet rather than a watch.
__________________
16610 Submariner Date; D Serial 16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial 16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial |
|
29 July 2008, 05:29 AM | #39 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,942
|
Quote:
I've never worn a dress with this watch, but perhaps I should start. Hmmm...maybe Stallone is a cross-dresser?
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
|
29 July 2008, 07:52 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
|
29 July 2008, 09:00 AM | #41 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
Anyway, I think I've made my point, and I don't want this thread to spiral out of control After all you were kind enough to tell me more about Shapur. By the way, the Panerai looks good on you. |
|
29 July 2008, 09:21 AM | #42 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: usa
Watch: GMTII PEPSI
Posts: 385
|
Who is everybody kidding.If ROLEX made the submariner
in a 44mm, 46mm 48mm it would probably be one of hottest out there.As you see Rolex is starting to get alittle larger with the DD.Only time will tell.I'm thinking large. PS I'm on the list for the new DD. Hopefully sooner than later. THE186ELEMENT. |
29 July 2008, 09:40 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 186
|
Quite the debate here. I have been a Rolex person for over 20 years and I guess I am also a traditionalist. Although there is a place in the market for high end big watches, I hope Rolex does not jump into that market. In my opinion Rolex is about tradition and slow evolution of their watches. I wonder if generally this is a younger vs older person issue meaning younger wants watches that are larger and currently more fashionable and older likes traditional models and sizes.
__________________
"There are only two types of people in this world, those who like Neil Diamond and those who don't". Bob Wiley 16030A, 16013, 116520 |
29 July 2008, 10:17 AM | #44 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Howard
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,942
|
Quote:
Thanks a lot re: the Panerai. And by the way, we really need to organize a SF gathering, because there are a lot of us NorCal folks on this site.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other." |
|
29 July 2008, 12:13 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: NC
Watch: Any Rolex
Posts: 378
|
__________________
Wearing a Rolex is perpetual bliss! |
29 July 2008, 01:43 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
It's a fashion thing. Some feel they have to look the part and that means wearing ridiculously large watches.
I've got watches ranging from 42-34mm and I think they all look good. It depends on the design really. For instance, I wouldn't want a chronograph on a 34mm case, it would look too busy and I don't want my AK that just tells the time on anything larger than 36mm - it'll look to sparse. And if we're talking diver's watches (which have thicker cases) I think it'll look weird if it was in a 36mm case that was really thick. Personally though, I wouldn't touch anything under 34mm and over 44mm. I like variety but weird is weird. |
29 July 2008, 03:52 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
|
__________________
Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX 116520 SS Daytona White Dial 116520 SS Daytona Black Dial 116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial 16600 Sea-Dweller 16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel 16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller |
30 July 2008, 06:53 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
Fashion comes and goes. That's the beauty of life.
Classic style will always be fashionable.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
30 July 2008, 06:55 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
|
Here Here....or there there...just let me know Where!
__________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95) Rolex SS GMT IIc (08) Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..) Rolex Explorer II Blk (91) Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07) Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03) |
30 July 2008, 06:56 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Yes, 40 MM is the maximum for me. I prefer something smaller, like a 36 MM.
|
30 July 2008, 06:56 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
|
|
30 July 2008, 07:06 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
|
I just picked up this Zodiac V-Wolf 44mm. This will be the biggest watch I own. I don't think I'll mind the size, but it weights like half a pound! I haven't had it sized yet, but I hope the weight doesn't cause it to migrate too much on my wrist.
__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.