ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Top vintage buying priority | |||
Birthyear | 2 | 4.65% | |
Rarity / Exclusivity | 2 | 4.65% | |
Affordability / Price | 2 | 4.65% | |
Condition / Originality | 19 | 44.19% | |
Aesthetics / The Look | 13 | 30.23% | |
Trusted Source / Seller Reputation | 5 | 11.63% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25 September 2016, 10:05 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
Vintage watch POLL
I'm always on the hunt for an affordable birth year watch. Unfortunately having been born in 1966 does not leave me with many affordable options regardless of brand - Rolex, Tudor, Omega (pre-moon Speedy), Heuer, Zenith, Longines and other truly collectible brands/models have all become quite pricey.
Poll Question: When purchasing vintage, is your birth year a major consideration? Or are other factors more important? And because pics are a requirement, here is a sweet 66 DJ I ran across that piqued my interest - although too late as it was already sold! Pic from chrono trader. |
25 September 2016, 10:12 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
Vintage watch acquisition preferences
PS - If there's a way to do a poll where we could order preferences this would be much more interesting... just saying. Moderators? 1) the look is still important to me or I won't wear the watch 2) price - if I can't afford it the rest doesn't matter 3) condition and originality come next because it factors into both price and demand 4) trusted reseller next - vintage is a minefield 5) rarity is nice but not imperative 6) birthyear will be paramount but once for me The Rolex Cowboy |
25 September 2016, 10:31 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
|
1. Looks. I don't care if it's in NOS condition, because if it doesn't look good to me then I don't want it.
2. Condition along with all the pieces being period correct. I try to buy watches in the nicest condition possible because I believe that in a few short years they just won't be found. Finding parts for these old watches is an expensive and time consuming endeavor, so I'd rather have all the parts there in the first place. |
25 September 2016, 10:32 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Ky
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 16570
Posts: 2,362
|
BTW, if it's a 1601 you're after then you are in luck. The Datejust is one of the few vintage models that have not taken off in price and can still be found quite easily and in great condition.
|
25 September 2016, 10:35 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: san diego
Watch: me soak up the sun
Posts: 1,245
|
Vintage watch acquisition preferences
Quote:
By the way does anyone know if the wide/fat-boy dial was available in 1966? I've seen them on 69,70, and 71 - but never seen a 66 with that dial Just curious as I like the beefier look of that dial design The Rolex Cowboy |
|
25 September 2016, 11:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: IG @onthedial
Posts: 587
|
@actionkwj
fwiw, for me 1) Condition / Originality, 2) Aesthetics / The Look _________ Instagram: @onthedial |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.