|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 October 2016, 05:32 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13
|
Thoughts on this 16750?
I was hoping someone might be able to shed some light on this 16750? Does anyone know what price range these things typically trade for?
Thanks. |
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 06:03 AM
|
#2 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
You can find values all over the Internet, which are dependent on condition and not a single photo.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 06:10 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 341
|
Is that the actual watch you're thinking of buying? There are some real issues w that pic. I'd stay away at any price. I don't want to disparage anyone's sales post if so, but I think all can agree to two things - 1) that is the worst lume/relume I've ever seen, and, 2) the bracelet has definite fit to case and condition issues. My disclaimer is I'm viewing on iPhone and it could be tricking me, but if not, just sayin'.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Datejust Thunderbird Rolex 16713 GMT Master II Omega Bond 2351.80 Omega Speedmaster 145.014 Tudor BB Blue |
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 06:17 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 341
|
I'd say off-hand (without googling ad nauseum) it looks like fake. I don't think there's periods between GMT. It's not a 16750, appears to be 16753?? I'm no expert but if that's the exact watch, I'd start liking at exemplars online like quick.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Datejust Thunderbird Rolex 16713 GMT Master II Omega Bond 2351.80 Omega Speedmaster 145.014 Tudor BB Blue |
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 06:35 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 75
|
The T SWISS T is off, too, as well as the minute markers under the 6 o'clock position. The date dial is also whacky.
|
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 07:34 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,027
|
From what I can see the gold markers look too close to the minute track. also, the "GMT" looks a little wonky. Might just be a bad refinish.
Just my two cents. 
__________________
RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager |
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 09:23 AM
|
#7 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 731
|
Run Forest...run...far too many "issues" to warrant considering that watch at just about any price. My .02
|
|
|
|
|
21 October 2016, 09:57 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dallas
Watch: 116619, 16570
Posts: 198
|
Oh. NO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
