Help 26320st white vs 26331st panda

[japenney]

26320 for around 18.5k new. 26331 for around 22k new. Will the 26331 depreciate down to 17k used like the 26320? Should I wait til the hype dies down? I like the panda look but I like all 3 sundials same size and date window position on original...Hard call.

[hugs]

I am guessing the panda will have more room for depreciation and maybe will settle 1k or so higher used than the original.

FWIW I prefer the solid white dial regardless of price.

[Xerxes77]

Originally Posted by hugs

I am guessing the panda will have more room for depreciation and maybe will settle 1k or so higher used than the original.

FWIW I prefer the solid white dial regardless of price.

Agree

[wach16]

Even though I have an all white dial ROC the panda wins this battle!

[tcheeco]

26320 for me... mine says hi ;-)

[japenney]

Guys I have been thinking about it and I believe the original 26320 wins for me. The symmetry of the sub dials and date window placement are just so much better. I also think that the black Panda sub dials will be much harder to read at a glance...and finally I believe that the all white dial lets you view the waffle design in all its glory. The Panda sub dials take away from it a bit and that is one of the main reasons I love this watch.

[GB-man]

26320

[AK797]

I prefer the panda dial, but I do prefer the same size subdials. I'd take the Panda tho, but I'd need a decent discount esp as a new in-house could be out next year.

[jem7v]

My only problem with the panda is because the top 2 dials are bigger I just see Mickey Mouse when I look at them.

[mobster600]

I think the white 26320 is a little more original looking, which I prefer. The panda and two tone dials have a more modern feel. Either one is amazing, can't go wrong

[Lordofrolex]

Panda is amazing. A little pricey though.

[kutime]

Panda for me, it gives a nice contrast.
Can't really predict the price for the future, but I hope it doesn't drop as much :)




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AK797]

Originally Posted by kutime

Panda for me, it gives a nice contrast.
Can't really predict the price for the future, but I hope it doesn't drop as much :)




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[TOlsen]

I voted panda even though the plain white Looks more classic to me.

[Lordofrolex]

Panda it's amazing

[HK Islandboy]

I like them both, but would lean toward the white dial

[dmash]

Originally Posted by jem7v

My only problem with the panda is because the top 2 dials are bigger I just see Mickey Mouse when I look at them.

I cannot unsee this

[aleeboy]

White dial for me.

The subdials on the Panda pop a little too much for my liking.

[Leeq]

I prefer the panda dial, even though I HATE subdials on any watch. Maybe you could wait and see if you could get a better price for it later - they may come out with a new model or an even better watch.

[Tomas Eriksson]

Panda for me

[japenney]

I have a classic 26320 on the way. Decided against the panda. 17.5k lnib 2016 26320 vs 21k+ for the panda makes it even easier.

[Bigblack]

Originally Posted by dmash

I cannot unsee this

Damn now I see this Mickey Mouse as well I was really looking at buying this 😱😱

[benlee]

Panda will be my choice. For me another big plus for the 26331 is the ability to engage the chronograph without the need to unscrew the pushers.

[LAFLARE]

Uneven subdials bother me too much, plus the black draws too much attention away from the beauty of the white dial. Price aside, watch for watch, white all the way!

[HL65]

Originally Posted by benlee

Panda will be my choice. For me another big plus for the 26331 is the ability to engage the chronograph without the need to unscrew the pushers.

X2 so much nicer IMHO!

[1William]

The Panda would be my choice.