ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 November 2008, 03:26 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
|
Opinion on my WG Daytona
Hi there,
Just joined the forum and would appreciate some feedback from you guys. I bought a WG White Face Daytona from my local Rolex Dealer. I wanted the Black face - so rather than loose the sale they said that it would be sent back to Rolex and they'd get the face changed - it would come back and that would be the job done. It came back a week later with the black face of the S/S model installed (i.e. no numbers and white dials). It was sent off again and today has come back with what would appear to be a 'slate grey' face - i.e. not deep/gloss black but a more watered down version of it. I checked in the Rolex catalogue in store and it matches the shade exactly of a 'slate grey' face but the outer markings are red - whereas on the proper 'slate grey' face they are white. Could you guys please have a look at the pictures and let me know what your thoughts are before I take it to another Rolex dealer for a 2nd opinion? The depth of the black on the S/S face which they put on incorrectly first of all was much deeper/darker than this. Is this just how the white gold ones are? Thanks in advance for your comments. Rick. |
5 November 2008, 03:33 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
welcome to TRF
Looks perfect to me- enjoy!!
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
5 November 2008, 03:34 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
Congrats You not only have my favorite dial on a Daytona, but you have the correct dial for a WG Daytona that is not available on the SS model.
|
5 November 2008, 04:46 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: miami
Posts: 673
|
Dont see any problems other then how bad it looks on your wrist. It would look better on mine!!!! Can I have it? My Dad used to say "you dont get if you dont ask." I thought it would be worth a try....
|
5 November 2008, 04:48 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
|
I think it looks fantastic.
|
5 November 2008, 04:50 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Quote:
The SS Black dial is a glossy black, the WG is more of a matte black and is correct for the watch! Congrats! ~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
|
5 November 2008, 04:51 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 801
|
Couldn't agree more ..........in case you're not happy with it, just send it over to me Seriously, enjoy the hell out of it
|
5 November 2008, 05:35 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 135
|
Looks correct. At certain angles it will look slate grey and straight down it will appear matte black.
|
5 November 2008, 05:44 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
that looked great and
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
5 November 2008, 05:47 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 689
|
That's correct. The dark WG dial is matt, and looks flat in my opinion, the SS version with batons looks nicer as it's gloss. I had one and sold it, my friend has the silver dial and it is beautiful, and worktolivelife has the meteorite which is just to die for.
|
5 November 2008, 06:17 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Home!
Posts: 148
|
looks magnificent.
|
5 November 2008, 06:24 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: us/pt
Posts: 207
|
beautiful!
|
5 November 2008, 06:27 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 831
|
love it!
|
6 November 2008, 01:25 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
|
Thanks for all of your input!
Looks like the WG has a matt finish as some of you suggested. Next time i'm near another dealer i'll pop in for another opinion :) Cheers all! Rick. |
6 November 2008, 01:32 AM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 459
|
It really is perfect. Congrats.
|
6 November 2008, 03:05 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Stan
Location: Brunswick, Ohio
Watch: All of them
Posts: 967
|
Darn good looking Daytona.
|
6 November 2008, 03:15 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
I have two very healthy kidney's. I am more than willing to trade you one for the Daytona if you are not happy with it!
Welcome to TRF. There are some incredibly knowledgable people on here who will help you, but may I suggest you post larger pics? That will help them to give you a more exact opinion. Also, see the Rolex reference section & the review section. There's a ton of info & pics there. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=27108 http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=47529 Congratulations on a beautiful watch & wear it in the best of health.
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.