ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 May 2018, 03:01 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
|
Sea Dweller 4000 years of production?
I have a chance to buy a new Sea Dweller 4000 from my dealer today; what were its years of production? This watch, from what I know is popular, with a 40 mm size, and trying it on, it was not a lot different from my GMT BLNR -- in its size -- but for its weight and you know it is there. Dealer says this watch is hard to get. Opinions about them from those of you who own one? Robert
|
26 May 2018, 03:01 AM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
2014-early 2017
Brand New & stickered at MSRP or 'new' and priced at a premium? |
26 May 2018, 03:07 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
|
Here is a quick pic I took... brand new w warranty card to be in my name...
https://photos.app.goo.gl/b3Qv741cTMpUtHTm1 |
26 May 2018, 03:09 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
|
26 May 2018, 03:11 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
|
Brand new at MSRP? Get it! It is a great dive watch.
|
26 May 2018, 03:11 AM | #6 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
Quote:
Nice watch no less. Buy it if you like it. |
|
26 May 2018, 03:12 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: Older GMTs & Subs
Posts: 565
|
It's a great alternative to the submariner with date ... and the 40 mm size is ideal.
|
26 May 2018, 03:12 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
Lol that's the 126600 at 43mm
'with a 40 mm size, and trying it on, it was not a lot different from my GMT BLNR -- in its size'. Did you have a couple drinks prior to going in? Why do so many people think this is the old model? |
26 May 2018, 03:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
its less than 4000 years i can assure you
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
26 May 2018, 03:14 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
|
26 May 2018, 03:17 AM | #11 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
Quote:
I'm also confused at how the OP claimed it wasn't any different in size from his GMT2 |
|
26 May 2018, 03:25 AM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
Quote:
Side-by-side there's a massive difference. The photo you found is a great example. |
|
26 May 2018, 03:32 AM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
That is pretty funny!!! I'd certainly notice the difference if it were on my 6.5 inch wrist!!! Sorry OP (Tshiemer) but it's (SD43) not close to the GMT either.
|
26 May 2018, 03:36 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
Yeah, not sure, as I stated above, perhaps he had a few at the bar around the corner before going in . Regardless, it's still a nice watch. I'd honestly consider a SD43 if it had all white text. I'm just a monochrome guy and think red letters look 'gimmicky'. It's large, but would be a great weekend watch IMO. 40mm is better for daily wear.
|
26 May 2018, 03:41 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northeast, USA
Watch: GMT2-DJ2-SubC-SD43
Posts: 208
|
|
26 May 2018, 04:46 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex duo
Posts: 1,992
|
|
26 May 2018, 05:14 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
|
126600 !
Wow I bought it and have a 126600! A modern Seadweller. Very comfortable and a good opportunity.
|
26 May 2018, 05:36 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
|
26 May 2018, 06:53 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
|
26 May 2018, 07:12 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
|
If you are not looking at it, the width of the watch does feel subjectively like about a 40mm; surprisingly the extra 3 mm is not that great of a difference. It is much less than the 45 mm Grand Ocean Omega or whatever it was years ago I tried briefly. Looking at it side-by-side to the two ceramic GMTs alternated, sure it is larger, but subjectively (disregarding the heavier weight) the extra 43 mm is not uncomfortable subjectively. Robert
|
26 May 2018, 07:15 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
The tapered lugs certainly help. Congrats on the purchase! You certainly entertained us here and yourself with a new watch!
|
26 May 2018, 07:15 AM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
Quote:
|
|
26 May 2018, 07:19 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
|
Thanks right now I only have the two GMT ceramics and have had many subs in years past...and all the new ceramics seem much more robust ... in feel. Really this board teachestremendously about watches ... thank you
|
26 May 2018, 07:22 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: in my house
Posts: 357
|
Love the SD4k...will never let it go.
if it sings to you grab it!! |
26 May 2018, 09:52 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: planet earth
Watch: Variety
Posts: 353
|
Which Sea Dweller 4000 was in production until 2008 then? I thought I saw one 5 digit one in pawn shop, year of production 2004 and immaculate looking. They are asking USD 6000 for it
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 May 2018, 10:15 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
There's been multiple variations of the Sea Dweller.....that's the 16600. There was none from ~2008-2014
|
26 May 2018, 10:35 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Watch: 116619
Posts: 1,334
|
Quote:
|
|
26 May 2018, 10:47 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: planet earth
Watch: Variety
Posts: 353
|
|
26 May 2018, 11:12 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 67
|
Get it! I bought my SD4k brand new two weeks ago from my AD. There aren’t many left out there at AD’s; especially at MSRP! Fantastic watch and has potential to be worth quite a bit one day!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 May 2018, 11:25 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
|
Do people ever read past the 1st post?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.