The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 August 2018, 10:52 PM   #1
Kostas
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Kostas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
This question is a moving target. It depends on what generation you are as to which model might have more historical significance.
agreed
Kostas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2018, 10:53 PM   #2
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
This question is a moving target. It depends on what generation you are as to which model might have more historical significance.
Makes it more interesting imo. Historic facts are still facts though, but it's great hearing people's opinions on whats important to them.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2018, 10:47 PM   #3
Rolex fan 61
"TRF" Member
 
Rolex fan 61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 1,262
Explorer
Rolex fan 61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2018, 11:29 PM   #4
1rolexman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 8
Submariner or Daytona


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1rolexman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2018, 11:42 PM   #5
Pauln
"TRF" Member
 
Pauln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Paul
Location: Colorado
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,543
This is a very interesting discussion. It’s true that the Explorer as we know it today did not reach the peak of Everest in 1953, but it is the result of what Rolex learned by supplying Himalayan expeditions with a dozen or so watches every year that needed to be returned to Rolex after the climbing season for testing. Tenzing Norgay was, supposedly, wearing an OP when he reached the summit. An OP gifted to him because he was a member of the unsuccessful 1952 Everest team. I don’t think this takes away from the Explorer’s role in climbing history. That would be like saying the Sub’s historical record is less because the watches Rolex put on the Bathyscaphes didn’t have the word “Submariner” on the dial.

I think both the Sub and Explorer have fantastic histories and have been used by many famous climbers and divers. Other Rolex’s take a back seat, IMO.

I know we’re discussing Rolex, but when it’s all said and done, it’s hard to beat the history of the Speedy Pro.
Pauln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 August 2018, 11:56 PM   #6
Chaching
"TRF" Member
 
Chaching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: None of ya #@!
Location: Somewhere
Watch: Many! 116718 GOLD
Posts: 2,137
"THE" Paul Newman Daytona . . . . .
Chaching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 12:13 AM   #7
JohnGT3RS
"TRF" Member
 
JohnGT3RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 160
Since I just picked an Explorer yesterday, it has to be the Explorer. Sub close second. For one specific watch, Paul Newman’s Daytona.
JohnGT3RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 12:21 AM   #8
vazquez1085
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: James
Location: New York
Watch: 116618LB
Posts: 64
But who was the first President with the “President”?
vazquez1085 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 07:25 AM   #9
Skwisgaar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Best Carolina
Watch: DJ II rhodium, '56
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazquez1085 View Post
But who was the first President with the “President”?
Eisenhower was the first President to wear a Rolex. The company gifted him a gold Datejust in 1950. He preferred wearing a Vulcain Cricket. JFK was the first President to own a DayDate but he never wore it. It was gifted to him in 1962 by Marilyn Monroe. He thought it would be wise to get rid of it and gave it to a trusted aide.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Skwisgaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 12:35 AM   #10
ras47
"TRF" Member
 
ras47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
While the Sub is certainly one of the most iconic Rolex (or any brand) watches, having a history is a specific criteria. I'd give the nod to to the GMT. It's creation as a cooperative effort between Pan Am's international pilots and Rolex, and availability since 1954, qualify as quite the history in my book. Also, the GMT did indeed make it to space as others have said. Not as part of NASA's official required equipment list, but as the personal choice of Astronauts.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710
Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono
ras47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 05:50 AM   #11
Castlesinthesky
"TRF" Member
 
Castlesinthesky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Dover
Watch: a few :)
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by ras47 View Post
While the Sub is certainly one of the most iconic Rolex (or any brand) watches, having a history is a specific criteria. I'd give the nod to to the GMT. It's creation as a cooperative effort between Pan Am's international pilots and Rolex, and availability since 1954, qualify as quite the history in my book. Also, the GMT did indeed make it to space as others have said. Not as part of NASA's official required equipment list, but as the personal choice of Astronauts.


This ^^^^^^
Castlesinthesky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 06:27 AM   #12
Jace
"TRF" Member
 
Jace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jace
Location: Boca Raton
Watch: Platinum DD 40
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castlesinthesky View Post
This ^^^^^^


This too. ☝️☝️☝️☝️


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Jace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 April 2020, 09:01 AM   #13
gliderpilot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: your attitude
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by ras47 View Post
While the Sub is certainly one of the most iconic Rolex (or any brand) watches, having a history is a specific criteria. I'd give the nod to to the GMT. It's creation as a cooperative effort between Pan Am's international pilots and Rolex, and availability since 1954, qualify as quite the history in my book. Also, the GMT did indeed make it to space as others have said. Not as part of NASA's official required equipment list, but as the personal choice of Astronauts.
The GMT was also worn by the Concorde test pilots in the 1960s
gliderpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 01:01 AM   #14
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
I think I side with the Oyster Perpetual for sheer historical impact.

Nice GMT Ras47
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 01:15 AM   #15
TimeToWatch
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TRF
Watch: Rolex & AP
Posts: 1,757
It’s got to be Paul Newman’s Paul Newman. Rolex wouldn’t be what it is today if it weren’t for that watch. From a free market perspective, its unprecedented price is reflective of its importance.
TimeToWatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2018, 07:47 AM   #16
ashbaug2
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Jon
Location: Reno, NV
Watch: 126710 BLRO
Posts: 1,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeToWatch View Post
It’s got to be Paul Newman’s Paul Newman. Rolex wouldn’t be what it is today if it weren’t for that watch. From a free market perspective, its unprecedented price is reflective of its importance.
I'm pretty sure Rolex was doing just fine before Paul Newman was sighted wearing a Daytona. The Daytona, on the other hand, might have benefited very nicely from having Mr Newman wearing it, as it wasn't a popular model.

The Datejust is my vote; It was the precursor to all of the "Professional" models and also worn by practically every world leader of major significance in the last 70 years, at some point.
ashbaug2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 01:27 AM   #17
Jarett
"TRF" Member
 
Jarett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jarek
Location: Polynesia
Posts: 110
Submariner ? Explorer ? GMT ? Daytona ? .... uff, that is question ! :)
Jarett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 01:39 AM   #18
Innocenti
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 832
If you want a watch with the best history that surely has to be the omega speedmaster
Innocenti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 01:59 AM   #19
ras47
"TRF" Member
 
ras47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innocenti View Post
If you want a watch with the best history that surely has to be the omega speedmaster
True. I cannot think of a watch with a more storied history than the Omega Speedmaster. But this is about the Rolex watch with the best history. I don't think anybody rivals Omega for a watch with a storied history.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710
Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono
ras47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 01:54 AM   #20
NLYogi
"TRF" Member
 
NLYogi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 761
To me it is more about the brand itself, its heritage and horological inventions (date wheel, Oyster etc.) as opposed to some particular watch’s history.
__________________
♛ Explorer 214270
♛ Next: Day-Date 36 mm

1 Watch guy
NLYogi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 03:07 AM   #21
Amochosto
"TRF" Member
 
Amochosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,168
It’s got to be the Rolex of 1914 the wach that started the entire process of moving men from wearing pocket watches to wrist watches. First wristwatch to earn the class A precision certificate from Kew Observatory which seems to have been a certification process to certify watches were accurate enogh to use for navigation purposes.

I'm not saying the movement from pocket watches to wristwatches wouldnt have happened without these watches, but its undeniable these watches happened to be the moving force behind it.

Second must be the OP. Look at the writing on your Rolex watches. Unless you have some amazing early models, (or a Cellini?) your Rolex is an Oyster Perpetual _____ I have an Oyster Perpetual Sky-Dweller, Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller, Oyster Perpetual GMT Master II etc. All modern Rolexes are either OPs or OPs with additional complications.
__________________
1771036

Stupidity is doomed, therefore, to cringe at every syllable of wisdom

Heraclitus of Ephesus
Amochosto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 11:19 AM   #22
CRM114
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amochosto View Post
It’s got to be the Rolex of 1914 the wach that started the entire process of moving men from wearing pocket watches to wrist watches. First wristwatch to earn the class A precision certificate from Kew Observatory which seems to have been a certification process to certify watches were accurate enogh to use for navigation purposes.

I'm not saying the movement from pocket watches to wristwatches wouldnt have happened without these watches, but its undeniable these watches happened to be the moving force behind it.
The moving force behind men accepting/adopting wristwatches rather than pocket watches was WW1. No one brand was "the moving force" behind it, and Rolex didn't figure in significantly at all when it came to officer, trench, and aviator watches, other brands were far more numerous and popular. If one had to pick the single biggest player post war it would have been Cartier.

Rolex has done much in wristwatch history, but inventing or popularizing the wristwatch is not one of them.
CRM114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 12:37 PM   #23
Amochosto
"TRF" Member
 
Amochosto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRM114 View Post
The moving force behind men accepting/adopting wristwatches rather than pocket watches was WW1. No one brand was "the moving force" behind it, and Rolex didn't figure in significantly at all when it came to officer, trench, and aviator watches, other brands were far more numerous and popular. If one had to pick the single biggest player post war it would have been Cartier.

Rolex has done much in wristwatch history, but inventing or popularizing the wristwatch is not one of them.
I read an article that was much more promotional about Rolex being the driving force of wristwatch use, and yes I did know WWI played a significant role. I guess I should have been more skeptical of the claims. In any case after reading a bit more about points you made, I still think the early high accuracy Rolex wrist watches rank near or ahead the OP as the Rolex watches with the most important history.
__________________
1771036

Stupidity is doomed, therefore, to cringe at every syllable of wisdom

Heraclitus of Ephesus
Amochosto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 12:56 PM   #24
Watch Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: HK
Watch: 114270
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amochosto View Post
I read an article that was much more promotional about Rolex being the driving force of wristwatch use, and yes I did know WWI played a significant role. I guess I should have been more skeptical of the claims. In any case after reading a bit more about points you made, I still think the early high accuracy Rolex wrist watches rank near or ahead the OP as the Rolex watches with the most important history.
The OP has a well rounded history, from historical innovation to exploration and feats of endurance.
Watch Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 06:58 AM   #25
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,254
Submariner.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 07:07 AM   #26
lenfried29
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
I value the memory/history of the watches relative to me and my family first. That being said it's not a Rolex in my collection.
lenfried29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 08:31 AM   #27
jfp2476
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 133
OP!

All this talk of Hillary/Norgay and the questions swirling around...no questions about Sir Francis Chichester and the Gipsy Moth IV...
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ar...ster-perpetual

A truly unsung badass circumnavigating the globe and sending TELEGRAMS about his awesome OP. Case closed

Sent from my moto g(6) using Tapatalk
jfp2476 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 11:24 AM   #28
Explorer1nyc
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: nyc
Posts: 34
The sub has gotten more votes than any other watch for Rolex w/ best history - which the op asked about

That's gotta say something, and I don't even own a sub

#2 seems to be the Oyster Perpetual

Last edited by Explorer1nyc; 27 August 2018 at 11:24 AM.. Reason: "be"
Explorer1nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 11:34 AM   #29
Bosbevok
"TRF" Member
 
Bosbevok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canada
Watch: Day Date 40 GMT II
Posts: 711
Has to be the DD called the President because more US presidents, including JFK, have worn one than any other Rolex.
Bosbevok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2018, 11:59 AM   #30
Skwisgaar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Best Carolina
Watch: DJ II rhodium, '56
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosbevok View Post
Has to be the DD called the President because more US presidents, including JFK, have worn one than any other Rolex.
That's incorrect. JFK never wore the DD that Monroe gave him... it could have turned scandalous. Eisenhower's Rolex was a DJ. The first President to wear the DD was LBJ. Reagan wore a DJ. Obama wore a Tag until his SS detail gave him a Jorg Gray for his birthday. Clinton and Bush both wore Timex but Clinton was actually very much into watches... he owned Panerai, A. Lange & Sohne, Cartier, etc. But no Rolex.

The President's Watch has been the Vulcaine Cricket since the Truman administration. Eisenhower even did ads for them while he was still active duty. If LBJ was giving you a gift, you could bet it was going to be a Cricket. He once said he "felt somewhat less dressed without it." They are definitely handsome pieces. But I know I would choose a DD in a skinny minute. I suppose a watch that costs only $8k says "Man of the People" a little better than one that costs $36k.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Skwisgaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.