ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

tyler1980 · 3 October 2018, 06:07 PM

all of that is good advice except the obvious. A fake watch can have fake papers so the fact that RSC (maybe) worked on it doesnt prove anything if the paper isnt real.

Its good supporting documentation but it doesnt prove anything unless you verify the paperwork, but its probably easier to just verify the watch

Just playing devils advocate and thinking like a paranoid buyer who doesnt know the OP. No one should automatically assume a watch is authentic based on paperwork. Its a great way to give people a false sense of security and encourage them not to scrutinize the watch.

3 October 2018, 06:07 PM	#23
tyler1980 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Houston Posts: 17,622	all of that is good advice except the obvious. A fake watch can have fake papers so the fact that RSC (maybe) worked on it doesnt prove anything if the paper isnt real. Its good supporting documentation but it doesnt prove anything unless you verify the paperwork, but its probably easier to just verify the watch Just playing devils advocate and thinking like a paranoid buyer who doesnt know the OP. No one should automatically assume a watch is authentic based on paperwork. Its a great way to give people a false sense of security and encourage them not to scrutinize the watch. __________________ Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)