ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 October 2018, 11:35 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 9
|
Fluted vs. engine-turned
I'm starting to research 5-digit Datejusts. (Nothing wrong with 4-digit DJs, of course, but any watch I eventually purchase will be a part of a rotation, so quickset would be nice.)
I love the classic look of engine-turned steel bezels. However, there are a ton of watches with white gold fluted bezels on the market too, and this increases the number of dial colors available. I am thinking that fluted would be OK for me if I come across a good watch, especially if it is a full set. But I still want to avoid the over-the-top shine that modern fluted DJs have. I haven't seen a lot of older DJs in the steel. So, I want to ask—in real life, is there a huge difference in the shininess/flashiness, durability, and overall look between a 5-digit fluted vs. a 5-digit engine-turned bezel? |
4 October 2018, 01:29 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
|
I think this only matters as far as your personal preference.
My experience of wearing an Oyster Perpetual Date with engine turned fluted bezel for 31 years now is no one (outside of another watch enthusiast) is ever going to care or even see what is on your wrist. So any "shininess" or "flashiness" is likely to only be noticed by you. You will notice it only because you will be looking at it a lot. Durability is really a non-issue unless you are going to attempt to destroy the watch. (I have smacked the bezel of mine a few times over the years and have not had any issue. Just a few light abrasions of the antique plastic crystal.) Both designs look great. So why not get a few of each and have a nice collection? |
5 October 2018, 02:14 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 27
|
Here's my 1980's DJ 16030 with engine turned bezel. I think the engine turned bezel is less flashy than the fluted bezel.
|
5 October 2018, 02:35 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Really can't go wrong either way, I wouldn't say either is flashy. Just workhorse DJs telling time everyday. :)
1984 16030 |
5 October 2018, 11:52 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 9
|
Thanks for the responses and great pics!
I have to say my preference is engine-turned, because of their distinctive look, but I'm going to expand my search to fluted as well. |
5 October 2018, 12:42 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: John
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16234 Datejust
Posts: 33
|
Its 100% personal preference. I have the white gold on a 16234 and I couldn’t be happier with it.
|
5 October 2018, 12:43 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Florida
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
7 October 2018, 09:39 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Carolina US
Posts: 8
|
I have seen some with “bark” bezels too. Kind of cool.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 October 2018, 09:58 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Watch: of course
Posts: 8,429
|
|
8 October 2018, 02:45 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
I like engine turned. Wore a black dial SS with small Roman for years. One of the few I ever got comments on from other Rolex guys.
|
8 October 2018, 11:28 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Stephen
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: Sub, OP41, Airking
Posts: 23
|
Just picked up this 16030 this afternoon. I was definitely looking for a fluted bezel but couldn’t pass this up, the price was extremely good and it’s a gentleman I had done business with before.
|
8 October 2018, 12:40 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US
Posts: 2,237
|
Good choice. :)
|
8 October 2018, 01:37 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,676
|
Congrats !
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.