What watch would you buy?

[walds11]

Sub Date.

Anyway, the price on the Tudor chrono is way too high. They are nice, buy way too thick for my tastes.

[Psmith]

The Sub Date would be a great partner to the GMT...

...or (just to help ) how about a lovely black dial Exp II ...?


Good luck with whatever you decide on

Cheers

[joeyk]

sub for me , oh yeah :)

[JimSnyder]

Originally Posted by Timber Loftis

Tudor Chrono.

I have to have a date window in my watches. So the Tudor Chrono is, for my uses, superior to the Daytona. It's really the only racing chrono I'd own. It kicks the Subbie's butt in my opinion, and is more useful and more rare.

X2. The Tudor Chronos are not getting any cheaper. They are way underrated and valued. Far less were produced compared to a Rolex Sub. The Subs are a dime a dozen and one can be had anytime. Tudor

[vapalux]

That Tudor looks the biz, if the seller comes down as Wolfgang said. For me its the Tudor all the way.

Si

[greenfan]

The submariner. A Tudor is just a Tudor but a submariner is a ROLEX.....

[MrCowboy99]

Submariner

[Welshwatchman]

The sub seems to be the better buy but the Tudor is the nicer watch IMO.

[356 speedster]

Go with the most famous watch on the planet. Sub that is.

[Kokyuryoku]

Sub Date, Sub Date, Sub Date, Sub Date, Sub Date, Sub Date

[charliec]

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

The sub seems to be the better buy but the Tudor is the nicer watch IMO.

Well said ....

[TempoKing]

Both, are great looking watches
If I was buying...
I would have liked to pay $2500 for the Tudor and $3400 for the Sub

[wantonebad]

Originally Posted by tempoking

both, are great looking watches
if i was buying...
I would have liked to pay $2500 for the tudor and $3400 for the sub

x2

[chazha]

Submariner. I would never wear a Tudor. :-D

[Dr.B]

Sub all the way.

[SLS]

Sub, but you can find them much cheaper than $3900.
Scott

[earl of huntingdon]

Originally Posted by SLS

Sub, but you can find them much cheaper than $3900.
Scott

x2

[haakon59]

I would get the Submariner, but I don't exactly understand why the GMT II can't be a daily wearer. I also think the Chrono price seems high, as others have said.

[lawrenceb]

M Sub date.. cant beat a SS Sub!

[ArizonaHD]

Submariner Date all the way, Tudor is over rated, it is a ETA in a watered down rolex case, it is the cheap line. I'd take a speedmaster over a tudor.

Tudor is NOT a Rolex, Just like Swatch is not an Omega!

[Astroguy]

No question go with the sub.