ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ac_eddings · 13 December 2018, 09:20 AM

Explorer 114270 or 214270? Can’t go wrong with either I’m sure. Just curious what you guys prefer of the two?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

opawlows · 13 December 2018, 11:15 AM

Prefer the MK1 214270. The size suits my wrist and frame better than the 36mm.

jrs146 · 13 December 2018, 11:23 AM

36mm is a bit too small for me so I do prefer the 39mm version. However are true classics in their own respect.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jcy90 · 13 December 2018, 11:23 AM

39mm

Justinmg · 13 December 2018, 11:35 AM

36mm

MickCollins1916 · 13 December 2018, 12:13 PM

I tried the 36mm version and it didn’t sing to me. Owned the 214270 Mk I, same thing, and sold it. But I’ve been rocking my Mk II for two years strong and the love’s still there. 39mm all the way for me.

rmlovett1 · 13 December 2018, 12:15 PM

The 39mm version fits me best, but I like the 214270 better.
I don’t have either one, but have owned both in the past.

sensui · 13 December 2018, 12:15 PM

The 36mm 114270.

rph08 · 13 December 2018, 12:16 PM

I had a 39mm with a MK I dial, but I sold it. I replaced with a 114270 that I still own. My wrist measures right at 7.5 inches, and I prefer the 36mm. I do really like the current Explorer, but not enough to swap around.

13 December 2018, 09:20 AM	#1
ac_eddings "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: USA Posts: 67	Which do you prefer? Explorer 114270 or 214270? Can’t go wrong with either I’m sure. Just curious what you guys prefer of the two? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 December 2018, 11:23 AM	#3
jrs146 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Josh Location: Lost in time Watch: Me Nae Nae Posts: 9,823	36mm is a bit too small for me so I do prefer the 39mm version. However are true classics in their own respect. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ "Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter

13 December 2018, 11:35 AM	#5
Justinmg "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Justin Location: FL Watch: PO/EXPL Posts: 3,371	36mm __________________ //////////////////////////////// Member of The Nylon Nation Does it do anything? It tells the time.

13 December 2018, 12:16 PM	#9
rph08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Chris Location: USA Posts: 992	I had a 39mm with a MK I dial, but I sold it. I replaced with a 114270 that I still own. My wrist measures right at 7.5 inches, and I prefer the 36mm. I do really like the current Explorer, but not enough to swap around. __________________ Can you name the truck with four wheel drive, smells like a steak and seats thirty-five... Canyonero! Canyonero!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

13 December 2018, 11:15 AM	#2
opawlows "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Earth Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM Posts: 1,271	Prefer the MK1 214270. The size suits my wrist and frame better than the 36mm.

13 December 2018, 11:23 AM	#4
Jcy90 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Real Name: Jonathan Location: New York Watch: GMT & SUB Posts: 703	39mm

13 December 2018, 12:13 PM	#6
MickCollins1916 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Bill Location: Baltimore, MD Watch: 116600 SD4K Posts: 3,282	I tried the 36mm version and it didn’t sing to me. Owned the 214270 Mk I, same thing, and sold it. But I’ve been rocking my Mk II for two years strong and the love’s still there. 39mm all the way for me.

13 December 2018, 12:15 PM	#7
rmlovett1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Richard Location: GA Watch: YTBD Posts: 23,509	The 39mm version fits me best, but I like the 214270 better. I don’t have either one, but have owned both in the past.

13 December 2018, 12:15 PM	#8
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,443	The 36mm 114270.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)