ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 December 2008, 01:55 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: THAILAND
Posts: 38
|
Need your advise between SD and Deepsea
If you have to have one , which one should be between SD 16600 and Deepsea 116660? Now , I 'vs had SD M serial , but I 'm considering to sell it and buy a new Deepsea. Was it worth for to sell and get the new deepsea?
Thanks |
22 December 2008, 01:59 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
These two watches share the same movement and the same name.
Beyond that, they are not even in the same league... (or 20,000 leagues under the sea). The SD is a pretty tame, mainstream Sport watch with capability you will never use. The DSSD is a specialty monster that's going to stand out above your wrist and shine like a beacon no matter where you go.. It has capability that nobody will use. It's a personal decision.. If you are into dive watches the DSSD is going to be the ultimate, no question.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
22 December 2008, 02:06 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: USA
Posts: 1,857
|
SD Is the way to go. The DSSD is too big and as market prices are reflecting, it is not that big a hit. The other issue is that the SD will no longer be produced. It was never a big seller and now that production stopped, it should hold its value much better.
__________________
|
22 December 2008, 02:23 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Watch: Rolex SS Daytona
Posts: 122
|
|
22 December 2008, 02:45 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Watch: Cellini Cestello
Posts: 79
|
The SD is much more practical for daily wearing. The Deep Sea is almost too big both for comfort and for blending in with formal attire.
__________________
|
22 December 2008, 03:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
I have both the SD & DSSD. As much as I love the DSSD, I would never consider flipping my SD to fund a DSSD. The SD is a classic & will be discontinued very soon whereas the DSSD will probably be around for years to come. It's really up to you but I would keep the SD and save up for the DSSD.
|
22 December 2008, 03:17 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
i'd hold on to the sd you have, esp since they are now discontinued. it still works pretty good in the tub at maximum depth i'd bet.
|
22 December 2008, 04:20 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
|
22 December 2008, 05:40 AM | #9 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
I have both and LOVE both
One cant replace the other. I wear the DSSD 99% of the time BUT sometimes it sits too high to comfortably fit under some shirts and I wear something else. 1) Go try it on and see what you really think 2) If you LOVE it buy it and if you must then flip your SD My suggestion... Try it on and see if you like it. If you love it I suggest keep your SD and save till you can have both. You will never lose money on your SD from what you would sell it for now.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
22 December 2008, 05:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 969
|
Each to their own . That's the beauty of this forum. What watch smiles most at you is the real winner in this question??? As a person who doesn't re-sell watches I couldn't care less about values 10 yrs from now ........... big gulp............. well maybe slightly.......but the reasons for my purchases are purely personnal and not business IMHO.
__________________
Milgauss GV DSSD SS Daytona White Mid-size DJ Tudor 18ct Prince |
22 December 2008, 10:04 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Quote:
But I digress...to the OP, I say buy the one that feels right to you...impossible for us 'strangers' to answer this question for you. My first Rolex was a SD but I ended up selling it for a Sub Date as I thought the face looked a little small due to the larger crystal. I'm now a DSSD owner and wouldn't dream of going back to a SD (or Sub)...but that's because I love bigger watches and think the DSSD is the most comfortable larger watch I've ever owned (not to mention the bracelet & Glidelock are a thing of beauty IMO). Others will obviously have very different reactions to both watches, and that is why only you can decide which is right for you. Good luck. |
|
22 December 2008, 10:40 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Morten
Location: Delaware
Watch: SD, Daytona, GMT-C
Posts: 273
|
<-------------- look to the left.
SD!!!!! |
22 December 2008, 10:59 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Both are fine. It's what you prefer.
|
23 December 2008, 12:08 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: THAILAND
Posts: 38
|
Umm, I decide to keep SD,and get a new DSSD when it's ready for me!. I think I got conclusion. Thanks for all comments!!!
|
23 December 2008, 12:22 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: GB
Posts: 220
|
|
23 December 2008, 12:50 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: B
Location: UK
Posts: 976
|
The DSSD is fine for everyday wear, once you get used to it.
__________________
Current: 1: Rolex DSSD M 2008 2: Rolex Day-Date 40 YG White Dial Random 2018 3:Panerai Luminor Submersible Titanium PAM 25 2013 P Previous:[/B] 1: Rolex 16610 Y 2002 2: Rolex Daytona V 2008 3: Rolex 16610LV Z 2007 4: Rolex Milgauss 116400GV V 2008 5: Panerai Luminor Marina PR PAM 93 2005 6: AP ROO Diver H 2013 7: Rolex DJ II Slate w/ Grn Romans Random 2013 8:Panerai Submersible Ti PAM 25 2013 |
23 December 2008, 05:52 AM | #17 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
Seems the VAST majority of people who talk down about the DSSD
do not own one and haven't even tried one on for more than a minute IF they have at all. I bought a DJ a few years ago and thought it was the perfect size. I bought the SD last year and thought it was going to be weird and too big for me. I put it on and after a day of wearing it I knew it was a GREAT watch and felt GREAT on the wrist. I heard about the DSSD and called my dealer, told him I had to have the first one. I had really thought of just buying and flipping it but when I went to pick it up I was with my GF and the dealer insisted if I was buying it they were going to size it for me (they didn't want me to put it on EBay) and I figured what the heck might as well see how it feels.. I put it on and I knew it was the watch for me. I still own and wear all of my others BUT the DSSD just keeps finding its way back onto my wrist... The DSSD is an AMAZING watch! (and this is coming from someone with a smaller wrist (6.75 in)
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
23 December 2008, 06:01 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
I tried them on several times and it's the thickness that bothered me, not the larger size.
I love my SD and it does not fit under tighter sleeved shirts. But I don't have problem showing it if SD does not want to be hidden under the sleeve.....
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
23 December 2008, 06:42 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Andalucia Spain
Watch: WG daydate-Daytona
Posts: 1,338
|
SD all day long
__________________
Choose to allocate your time to imbeciles at your peril! |
23 December 2008, 06:48 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 981
|
Deepsea for me....
probably your wrist should be big enough to pull this baby off.. but if you have the wrist, deepsea all day and all night..
__________________
2023 Watch Collection Panerai: 249 California, 232, 390 Rolex: Starbucks Tudor: Blue Pelagos |
23 December 2008, 11:02 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 676
|
It's definately a personal decission as others have stated. I chose the Deepsea when I had the choise. I don't regret it and love the watch. It gets alot of wrist time. I must admit though, I would also like to pick us an SD. Different watch, but I'm sure I'd like it as well. Good luck.
|
31 December 2008, 11:24 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Aaron
Location: westville
Watch: Rolex Seadweller
Posts: 7
|
im going through the same deal here,I own a Z seadweller and I cant help but keep looking at the deepsea.
|
31 December 2008, 11:29 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Henry
Location: CA, US
Watch: ing basketball
Posts: 2,977
|
As much as I love the SD, I have to go with the DSSD. It is Rolex's newest creation and everything is just improved. It makes the SD look like a civilian watch; DSSD is now the professional watch of Rolex. I have a saying..........
Show a SD to a DSSD owner and he will say "nice watch".....show a DSSD to a SD owner and he will lend you his wife! |
31 December 2008, 11:41 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: James Bond
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
Main difference between the two are the dimensions and depth rating. Oh, and price of course. Since it is your money paying for it you can decide if it is worth the spending $9600 on a SS diver.
|
31 December 2008, 11:46 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Henry
Location: CA, US
Watch: ing basketball
Posts: 2,977
|
Is it worth spending $5-6 on a SS Sub?...A lot of people do it, in the classifieds, you can get a DSSD for under $8k from some members. OP, get what you like....
|
31 December 2008, 11:52 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: James Bond
Location: USA
Posts: 457
|
I, personally, have no problem spending $10k on a SS watch like the DSSD. And obviously, you only buy what you like.
|
31 December 2008, 12:13 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Watch: 'chu lookin' at???
Posts: 964
|
I have to agree with all the above posts. I do not have an SD but I have the DSSD and no question that it will not fit under a dress shirt for me. The profile is too high. But this is offset by the bracelet which makes it a very comfortable watch to wear. And I can tell you it really looks good on the wrist because you can see it from a mile away.
__________________
"Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L" TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z" Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V" SS White Dial Daytona "V" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.