The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 22 June 2019, 04:15 AM   #1
BillH2121
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Edmond, OK
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 72
Cartier Tank Dilemma

I have decided I want a Cartier Tank Solo. Unfortunately, I live in an area where there is no Cartier boutique within 300 miles and I can find only two used watches locally to try on. Both of those watches are small size. My wrist is rather small at 7 inches - I think the Large version is probably the best choice for me. It’s hard for me to visualize and differentiate between L and XL tank without seeing them on my wrist. Also, I have not made complete peace with the idea of a quartz movement. Opinions on if the XL is too much for my size wrist - I’m not a fan of “big” watches (my go-to watch is an Explorer II). Thanks for any input.
BillH2121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 04:44 AM   #2
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
I own a large model quartz, with the Cartier caliber 690 which is a Frederic Piguet movement. These are very reliable quarts movements and consume very little power due to the lack of seconds hand. 5-6 years on one battery is not uncommon.

The xl has a more cluttered dial with its date window and seconds hand, this is something I rather dislike. And it has the 1847MC movement, which is not very well finished (even compared to ETA), not very accurate or reliable. I wish they would have kept working together with ETA and just thrown in a 2892-2.

Generally speaking I would pick a mechanical watch over a quartz all day, but not when it comes to this movement or the ETA 2000 which Cartier used a lot.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 05:50 AM   #3
tudorbaja27
"TRF" Member
 
tudorbaja27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: Tudor & Cartier
Posts: 2,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
I own a large model quartz, with the Cartier caliber 690 which is a Frederic Piguet movement. These are very reliable quarts movements and consume very little power due to the lack of seconds hand. 5-6 years on one battery is not uncommon.

The xl has a more cluttered dial with its date window and seconds hand, this is something I rather dislike. And it has the 1847MC movement, which is not very well finished (even compared to ETA), not very accurate or reliable. I wish they would have kept working together with ETA and just thrown in a 2892-2.

Generally speaking I would pick a mechanical watch over a quartz all day, but not when it comes to this movement or the ETA 2000 which Cartier used a lot.
Thanks for the info. I actually tried on the XL recently and am/was keen on pulling the trigger for an all-around dress watch - as I badly desire one.
Is the 1847MC a significant issue not worth rolling the dice on?
__________________
"Chi ha paura muore ogni giorno, chi non ha paura muore una volta sola" - Paolo Borsellino
tudorbaja27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 05:54 AM   #4
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by tudorbaja27 View Post
Thanks for the info. I actually tried on the XL recently and am/was keen on pulling the trigger for an all-around dress watch - as I badly desire one.

Is the 1847MC a significant issue not worth rolling the dice on?
It is just not a very well made movement. Don't expect it to run like a Rolex, or high end ETA.

I get the whole thing about brands wanting their own in house movements, prestige and marketing blah blah, but in the end there is no shame in using a well known and reliable ETA movement, and I wish they just would have used that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 05:55 AM   #5
tudorbaja27
"TRF" Member
 
tudorbaja27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: Tudor & Cartier
Posts: 2,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
It is just not a very well made movement. Don't expect it to run like a Rolex, or high end ETA.

I get the whole thing about brands wanting their own in house movements, prestige and marketing blah blah, but in the end there is no shame in using a well known and reliable ETA movement, and I wish they just would have used that.
Got it - thanks.
I'll keep that in mind as I move close to making a decision.

Cheers

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
__________________
"Chi ha paura muore ogni giorno, chi non ha paura muore una volta sola" - Paolo Borsellino
tudorbaja27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 06:00 AM   #6
SearChart
TechXpert
 
SearChart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by tudorbaja27 View Post
Got it - thanks.
I'll keep that in mind as I move close to making a decision.

Cheers

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Keep in mind that I am a RSC watchmaker, so I'm pretty anal when it comes to movements. What would bother me might not bother you.

I have only worked on the 1847MC once, a few years back, and this experience is what I base my opinion on.
I have no first hand experience with how it performs on the wrist for extended periods of time, I'm sure it is OK, but I just hoped for something better.

Not bashing on Cartier, I love the brand and its history and have owned one since I was 18 years old, and would definitely buy the brand again.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
Rolex uses rare elves to polish the platinum. They have a union deal and make like $90 per hour and get time and half on weekends.
SearChart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 06:02 AM   #7
tudorbaja27
"TRF" Member
 
tudorbaja27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: Tudor & Cartier
Posts: 2,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by SearChart View Post
Keep in mind that I am a RSC watchmaker, so I'm pretty anal when it comes to movements. What would bother me might not bother you.

I have only worked on the 1847MC once, a few years back, and this experience is what I base my opinion on.
I have no first hand experience with how it performs on the wrist for extended periods of time, I'm sure it is OK, but I just hoped for something better.

Not bashing on Cartier, I love the brand and its history and have owned one since I was 18 years old, and would definitely buy the brand again.
Of course - completely understood.
For my needs as a daily dress watch - it may very well fit the bill.

Can't think of a better, square dress watch in the $3k range. Classy all the way IMO

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
__________________
"Chi ha paura muore ogni giorno, chi non ha paura muore una volta sola" - Paolo Borsellino
tudorbaja27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 07:37 AM   #8
BillH2121
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Edmond, OK
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 72
Thanks for the info so far - I’m certainly feeling better about the quartz mvmt at this point. Would like to hear from those who own XL and their experience. Also, if someone has a 7 inch or so wrist and has some pics of either X or XL, I’d love to see them. Thanks!
BillH2121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 04:04 PM   #9
jag32
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,015
I have a 7” wrist and just bought a Cartier Tank Solo XL yesterday. I absolutely love it and the XL size wears just perfectly.







jag32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 04:05 PM   #10
jag32
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,015
Also, I paid $3250 from my Cartier AD with a small discount. So don’t let them charge you the full MSRP of $3450. If you like, I can put you in contact with my AD and they can ship.
jag32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 June 2019, 11:48 PM   #11
BillH2121
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Edmond, OK
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 72
^^^^ Thanks for those pics - that helps a lot! Great looking watch - Congrats!
BillH2121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 03:07 PM   #12
Justindo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: California
Posts: 2,176
I like the looks of the quartz Large model best but I too would have an issue with a quartz movement. The XL should work well on your 7" wrist, even though I'm not crazy about the date and the sweep seconds. I wish they made a no date sub seconds version, which would be perfect. You might also consider a JLC Reverso, which remedies these issues and is a significantly better watch all around, albeit at a higher price.
Justindo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 10:58 PM   #13
VintageVagabound
"TRF" Member
 
VintageVagabound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 568
Try the larger size Tank Americaine. For me it’s the perfect size and well worth checking out.
VintageVagabound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2019, 12:53 PM   #14
jag32
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by VintageVagabound View Post
Try the larger size Tank Americaine. For me it’s the perfect size and well worth checking out.
Wrist pic?
jag32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.