ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 August 2019, 10:14 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
|
16 August 2019, 05:52 AM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,015
|
Dial time
|
16 August 2019, 06:31 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,913
|
|
16 August 2019, 06:37 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 462
|
Neither but if it has to be one, it's the dual time. I don't like the dual time implementation compared to others out there but at least it is still a Royal oak and has all the design, finishing, and handwork that come with. The code still looks cheap....
|
16 August 2019, 07:29 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,253
|
For me it would be the dual time, and actually anything but the 11.59. While some may like it, I just don’t get it. I think that could change with a change in dial / hands / markers and maybe a slightly smaller case . Case Design is cool thougH.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
17 August 2019, 05:33 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 19
|
I prefer a RO over the Overseas purely for the case design lineage that is truely iconic in the watch world. And I think ROs just look better. Re: 15500 and 15400 suggestions, I prefer a 39mm case because it fits me better and also, it's truer to the original Jumbo size. My first choice would be a 15202 (or a 5402 obv) but for the price difference, I gravitate towards the 26120. Pretty useful complications imo. Think I'm leaning towards a white dial 26120...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.