ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 January 2012, 01:39 PM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: charles
Location: new york
Watch: explorer II
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
|
|
6 January 2012, 03:22 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Brook
Location: Texas
Posts: 178
|
I like TT. I have a TT sub, GMT, & YM. I have a gold wedding band and class ring so it goes well with those.
|
6 January 2012, 04:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: New York City
Watch: 116233
Posts: 193
|
TT rocks!!!
|
6 January 2012, 04:47 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
|
I am sure it's been said before, but I think one of the major reasons for the depreciation of the two tone and solid gold Rolex watches is as follows:
Faster wear and tear/stretch on TT and solid gold over SS bracelets, particularly the two tone jubilee bracelets, result in the need for bracelet replacement Sooner and at a significant cost over an all SS bracelet. In short, buying a TT or solid gold watch that has been worn and it's bracelet stretched to the point there is very little service life left means it has to sell at a big enough discount off its true secondary market FMV to offset that bracelet replacement issue. A replacement two tone oyster bracelet for a GMT 1675/16753/16713 is currently retailing at the Rolex AD for $2750 plus tax.
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238 |
6 January 2012, 04:42 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
This thread... #epicfail
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
6 January 2012, 05:06 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 100
|
I am not so sure that the TT Sub depreciates any faster than the SS. when you factor in the much larger discount. In my case I bought my BNIB 116613LB at 25% discount for a net price of $9,060.00 plus tax. That was $3,020.00 discount. I don't know if buying two watches at the same time influenced the amount of discount. I bought my wife a Pearlmaster also. I did not price the SS Sub but from what I have read here, the SS are not dicounted as much.
In my case it's all irrelevant because I am a one watch guy and do not trade, sell or collect. I was simply looking for the best price. I may not have gotten the best possible deal but I don't think I left much money on the table. |
6 January 2012, 05:06 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
I don't think depreciation concerns are much of a factor on the secondary market...the original owner takes the big hit. In my opinion it's just the flashy look that's not as popular. The TT Blue Sub was my first, loved it for several years but eventually I grew tired of the bling... especially as the economy nose-dived. TT = LOUD
|
6 January 2012, 08:43 AM | #8 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
I don't like the look of anything two tone as it all looks dated. It has to be one color for me and for now, its SS. I have considered rose gold but haven't found one that really makes me want to spend that kind of money on it
|
6 January 2012, 09:44 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
|
I for one like the TT.
__________________
My Trusty TT DJ |
6 January 2012, 10:30 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: LA
Watch: LV
Posts: 85
|
someone wants to buy a used rolex can't afored a new one.
|
6 January 2012, 11:57 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
|
|
7 January 2012, 01:47 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jacob
Location: Gothenburg, Swede
Watch: 16610 Z
Posts: 57
|
|
7 January 2012, 02:16 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
|
|
7 January 2012, 02:28 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Sandbox
Watch: ing your 6......
Posts: 1,379
|
It may not have occured to you that some of us prefer older models. Or has Rolex started making this one again?
__________________
. |
7 January 2012, 03:27 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
|
You don't say Dr.? I hope you are not a medical doctor Now at least we all know what you want to wear a Rolex.
By the way, your little "gem" of a statement should correctly look like this; "Someone who wants to buy a used Rolex cant afford a new one"
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238 |
18 January 2012, 04:30 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Watch: Omega
Posts: 825
|
|
8 May 2014, 03:31 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: S.Florida/Ontario
Watch: 6263, 1675
Posts: 2,259
|
__________________
life is good |
6 January 2012, 10:54 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
7 January 2012, 01:27 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
|
Just a thought - maybe those of us who buy on the secondary market do so because we value a solid used watch for a fair price - the opposite of a buyer who walks out of an AD with a new TT but $10K+ lighter in the wallet. Therefore maybe TT's are more for original buyers and value-conscious guys who lean towards the secondary market favor SS.
|
8 January 2012, 02:17 AM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: AZ
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 860
|
TT are so unwanted I just received one in the mail today, wish I would of read this thread before
|
16 January 2012, 03:50 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Sandbox
Watch: ing your 6......
Posts: 1,379
|
Quote:
I'm waiting on yet another TT, this time a GMT II. When will I ever learn?
__________________
. |
|
18 January 2012, 06:09 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
|
20 January 2012, 02:04 PM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: AZ
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 860
|
|
8 January 2012, 07:25 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Aaron Wolf
Location: Naples Florida
Watch: 116500 Black
Posts: 267
|
I love TT models and I am 31 got my first TT blue face sub at 22 so whoever made the "only people over 60 wear them comment" is mis-informed.
|
8 January 2012, 07:48 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
|
I think two tone is an excellent effort by Rolex to "dress up" the sport watch, particularly for the person who has just one watch that is worn at all times. I think this was the case years ago, particularly in the 60's, 70's, when a gentleman had one nice watch for all occasions versus today's more flexible multiple watch approach, especially with us WIS's here on TRF.
I love my two tone Rolex watches that combine the more formal TT look with the rugged durability of the SS oyster sport case. I am happy to give any unwanted or unappreciated two tone Rolex watches a safe, loving And nurturing home.
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238 |
10 January 2012, 12:21 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: pa
Posts: 98
|
back before gold skyrocketed you could buy a tutone daytona on the secondary market cheaper than stainless.also gold watches werent much more than an overinflated stainless watch.im fortunate enough to own several rolexes and one of my favorites is a tutone daytona slate face.i get more compliments on this watch then my ss daytona.as far as a solid gold white or yellow,mho is they are great.i think you will see the younger crowd comming back to gold in the near future.
|
15 January 2012, 02:21 AM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 245
|
I find some TT Rolex sports model are just nicer than the SS version. For example, TT GMTII, TT Daytona. These models, unlike the sub, exp ll, Milgauss are not really tool watches. They more of functional dress watches. For example, the GMT more suitable for travelling businessman or a pilot, hence a little gold adds a little prestige to the watch yet at the same time comes with a stronger SS case (than Gold case). I don't think all TT Rolexes are unwanted, just some of them can be quite sought after. Price difference is usually dependent on the condition of the watch.
Anyway, I got the TT version of the GMTIIC eventually. What's make me decide to is when I saw a someone wearing a PANIS no logo GMT. It looks excatly the same as the real thing!! Except it does not comes with the Rolex Logo. |
17 January 2012, 08:11 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Virginia
Watch: TT Submariner
Posts: 48
|
Is it not an individuals tastes that counts? Some people like TT and some people like SS. IMHO, it is what works for that individual. A TT watch is not purchased for what you can resell it for, it is purchased because that is what you like and desire. I have been reading these threads and just want to voice my opinion. We all lose when we buy a watch and flip it unless you get exactly what you paid or more. So who is the smartest, a guy who buys a watch and keeps it for a lifetime wether it's TT/SS or a guy who buys watches just for the resale value and what he can try to get out of it if he gets tired of it. Seems to me the latter is not decisive and does not really know what he wants. Why not have the best of both worlds. Save for the one that you don't have and make them both part of your treasure.
|
17 January 2012, 08:18 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston
Watch: Blue SS SkyDweller
Posts: 411
|
Surprisingly, after owning only SS Rolex's in the past, I just found last week what I consider the most beautiful Rolex I've ever seen, and to my surprise, after thinking I would never own a TT Rolex, I couldn't resist and ordered one!
|
17 January 2012, 10:04 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Virginia
Watch: TT Submariner
Posts: 48
|
That is nice!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.