The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 February 2010, 01:06 PM   #1
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
I like using a thing called the Sun.

Seriously Matt, natural lighting is very cool - and free!
Me too.
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2010, 05:29 PM   #2
Esexx
"TRF" Member
 
Esexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
I like using a thing called the Sun.

Seriously Matt, natural lighting is very cool - and free!
Ditto. No need for expensive lighting. Natural lighting is best and it brings out color best. (I think)

Go full frame!! My vote is a Nikon D700 or D3S, if not a D300S willl be great. A good prime lens such at the 50mm AFS which is a awsome lens and can use it for more that macro photography. Give cool looking Bokeh too.

But as someone said earlier, its not the camera but the photographer who makes the ptotograph.
Esexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 01:52 PM   #3
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
You sure that's just with a A650IS John?
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 01:56 PM   #4
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle L View Post
You sure that's just with a A650IS John?
Certainly Grasshoppa, love my little Costco Canon and FREE printer

and NO photoshop or enhancement either
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 01:58 PM   #5
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
I prefer to use my Canon point & shoot vs. my Nikon SLR. Granted the speed isn't the best...it still takes great pics. Not to mention it's more portable for those vacation moments.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 02:02 PM   #6
Evan614
"TRF" Member
 
Evan614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Buckeye Nation
Watch: out 4 Panerai bug
Posts: 414
Remedy, you need a DSLR camera with a macro function lens. or a MACRO LENS ~120mm

the point and shoots will be hard to manually set your focus.
plus get a tripod to use slow shutter speeds(Kyle does).
Evan614 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 02:06 PM   #7
xxthe_remedyxx
"TRF" Member
 
xxthe_remedyxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: George
Location: NYC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan614 View Post
Remedy, you need a DSLR camera with a macro function lens. or a MACRO LENS ~120mm

the point and shoots will be hard to manually set your focus.
plus get a tripod to use slow shutter speeds(Kyle does).
Cool, thanks for the advice. I'm absorbing all this great information. I'm going to chew on all of this and make a decision next weekend.
xxthe_remedyxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 02:09 PM   #8
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan614 View Post
Remedy, you need a DSLR camera with a macro function lens. or a MACRO LENS ~120mm

the point and shoots will be hard to manually set your focus.
plus get a tripod to use slow shutter speeds(Kyle does).
What's typically a slow shutter speed? Usually I use 1/15 - 1/50.
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 11:40 PM   #9
Evan614
"TRF" Member
 
Evan614's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Buckeye Nation
Watch: out 4 Panerai bug
Posts: 414
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle L View Post
What's typically a slow shutter speed? Usually I use 1/15 - 1/50.
You have gone slower than that. some in this thread at 1/10 and I think 1/8.
Evan614 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 02:19 PM   #10
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
I use from one second to 1/60 depends, but definitely need the tripod and a good light source.
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 02:33 PM   #11
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
Great shots in this thread...goes to show that an expensive camera does not always equal great pictures. A good photographer is a good photographer.

outtatime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 02:44 PM   #12
JohnEaton
"TRF" Member
 
JohnEaton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by outtatime View Post
Great shots in this thread...goes to show that an expensive camera does not always equal great pictures. A good photographer is a good photographer.

Welcome to TRF John

Nice photo
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment
JohnEaton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 03:29 PM   #13
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnEaton View Post
Welcome to TRF John

Nice photo
Thanks!

(By the way, I just re-read my post and realized it sounded like I was saying that I am a great photographer...far from it! What I probably should have added was that I have a D90 but really don't know what the heck I'm doing...but I'm trying to learn. Sorry if that came across arrogant.
outtatime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 03:31 PM   #14
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by outtatime View Post
Thanks!

(By the way, I just re-read my post and realized it sounded like I was saying that I am a great photographer...far from it! What I probably should have added was that I have a D90 but really don't know what the heck I'm doing...but I'm trying to learn. Sorry if that came across arrogant.
Well you are a great photographer, I love the setup.
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 03:35 PM   #15
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle L View Post
Well you are a great photographer, I love the setup.
Thanks! I really appreciate the kind words. That's one of my favorite shots (sorry it's not Rolex-related, however I just recently got back into the fold and have had my camera for about a year and a half. Hopefully will get some LV shots soon).
outtatime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 03:41 PM   #16
ParisDakarBmw
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
Now I want a A650IS
ParisDakarBmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 February 2010, 03:48 PM   #17
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
I think the Canon G10 works pretty well...........Above, and below the water.





__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2010, 12:01 AM   #18
OrchidDR
"TRF" Member
 
OrchidDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Watch: TT GMT II
Posts: 1,321
A good macro lense always helps - but you're right, it's the "skill" not the equipment~!
Attached Images
   
__________________
"Knowledge is Power"
OrchidDR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2010, 12:48 PM   #19
alfanator
"TRF" Member
 
alfanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Seattle/Shanghai
Posts: 134
Lighting is more important than the camera, get a small light box and clean the watch well before shooting.

I prefer to use a small P&S in Macro mode instead of my DSLR with Macro lens.

Canon S90 or Panasonic LX3 are both great for Macros. The LX3 is better for close ups than the S90 but less versatile overall.
alfanator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 12:11 AM   #20
outtatime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: Toledo, OH
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfanator View Post
Lighting is more important than the camera, get a small light box and clean the watch well before shooting.

I prefer to use a small P&S in Macro mode instead of my DSLR with Macro lens.

Canon S90 or Panasonic LX3 are both great for Macros. The LX3 is better for close ups than the S90 but less versatile overall.
A light box can be built for basically no money...I made one out of a big cardboard box, a few sheets of something called velum, and 2 of those halogen shop lights (or you can use external flashes if you have them). What you really should spend a little money on though is a tripod...I have a $25 one and it's fine, although I wish now it had a few more features. It really is crucial if you're doing stuff like this though.
outtatime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2010, 01:16 PM   #21
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
See, TRF photog Kyle agrees with me.

That's one of the reasons I love my bay window. Ten AM or even late afternoon on a weekend is a fun time to take some shots.

I would -as others recommended - get a Tripod and a cable or wireless release. I need to do likewise so I don't have to sift through so many shaky cam / blurry shots!
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 03:26 AM   #22
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
See, TRF photog Kyle agrees with me.

That's one of the reasons I love my bay window. Ten AM or even late afternoon on a weekend is a fun time to take some shots.

I would -as others recommended - get a Tripod and a cable or wireless release. I need to do likewise so I don't have to sift through so many shaky cam / blurry shots!
Window lighting is excellent for a lot of applications.
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2010, 06:05 PM   #23
Ashley
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,967
Kyle, do you use the kit lens with the Rebel? Or have you purchased a macro lens?
Ashley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2010, 08:00 PM   #24
Jolu
"TRF" Member
 
Jolu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jo
Location: Norway
Watch: Explorer I/II
Posts: 660
I use an old Canon Ixus compact camera in macro mode, works pretty good. Would really like to try a DSLR camera though, for the extreme close-ups.





__________________

“I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks”
- Daniel Boone -
Jolu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 02:16 AM   #25
Esexx
"TRF" Member
 
Esexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolu View Post
I use an old Canon Ixus compact camera in macro mode, works pretty good. Would really like to try a DSLR camera though, for the extreme close-ups.





Excellent photos!
Esexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 02:40 AM   #26
Esexx
"TRF" Member
 
Esexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxthe_remedyxx View Post
I'm in the market for a new camera and wanted to get some advice about what camera some of our "forum photographers" use. I want to start taking some cool macro shots of my 14060 once it gets back from service. Any advice? Price range is anywhere from $400-$600.

P/S - This thread might not be a Rolex discussion so if I'm posting in the wrong place please forgive me
Bottom line, it doesn't matter what type of equipment one has but the person taking the pictures makes all the difference.

Composition of the subject in the photo is important and learn how to use your camera. Also, I use Photoshop to edit but Picasa 3 is a great and free editing software.

Good luck!
Esexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 02:41 AM   #27
kyle L
"TRF" Member
 
kyle L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by Esexx View Post
Bottom line, it doesn't matter what type of equipment one has but the person taking the pictures makes all the difference.

Composition of the subject in the photo is important and learn how to use your camera. Also, I use Photoshop to edit but Picasa 3 is a great and free editing software.

Good luck!
Yeah, I use a picnik.com to edit my pictures, but I really need PS.
kyle L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 02:47 AM   #28
Esexx
"TRF" Member
 
Esexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle L View Post
Yeah, I use a picnik.com to edit my pictures, but I really need PS.
Kyle,

You don't need anything! You are a great photographer all on your own. But I know what you mean. there is so much you can do with PS. I don't even know how to use half of it!!
Esexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 03:02 AM   #29
RFXMM
"TRF" Member
 
RFXMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Mark
Location: Atl
Watch: 16710
Posts: 654
Nice pictures. I have to figure the lighting my shots always end up dark.
__________________
No I'm not! I had mine removed.
RFXMM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2010, 03:05 AM   #30
Esexx
"TRF" Member
 
Esexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Dean
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Watch: ing TRF All Day
Posts: 2,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFXMM View Post
Nice pictures. I have to figure the lighting my shots always end up dark.
Did you shoot manual mode and open aperture all the way (smallest f stop number) and use the sunlight? Or, all auto settings?
Esexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.