NEWSFLASH ! ROLEX is now fitting SuperJubilee's to ...

[STEELINOX]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Sorry guys, but I think the watch on his wrist is different from the one advertised.

The one on his wrist looks like the older 36 mm on Jubilee. I don't believe Rolex have come up with the 41 mm DJ2 on Jubilee.

End of story - JJ

Better put on, "your other glasses pally" !

[STEELINOX]

I know that "Mickey Mouse winder" anywhere's, and I have handled this piece (on OYSTER mind you) so I DO KNOW what the hell I am lookin at !

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Better put on, "your other glasses pally" !

Well, first off, if it's the Super Jubilee, it would have to be 21 mm lug width............which I don't believe Rolex have manufactured yet.

Secondly, if such a change were to take place, it would have been done AFTER the Basel fair - not BEFORE.

I still say the watch on his wrist is the older 36 mm DJ.

JJ

[Dan Pierce]

I think JJ may be right. Hard to tell from the pic but I thought the DJII would look bigger than that.
dP

[STEELINOX]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Well, first off, if it's the Super Jubilee, it would have to be 21 mm lug width............which I don't believe Rolex have manufactured yet.

Secondly, if such a change were to take place, it would have been done AFTER the Basel fair - not BEFORE.

I still say the watch on his wrist is the older 36 mm DJ.

JJ

Aah to be nieve and not "see the light" !
For crimanies, we have a member here who has actually handled one, did you not RTFT !

[STEELINOX]

read "mattmartin" post !

[STEELINOX]

Originally Posted by mattmartin

These are already in some stores. I know this because i held a tt djII with superjubilee in my own hands at an ad in northern va/metro DC on monday one week ago. And, I know the diFference between jubilee and superjubilee. I didn't buy it so no pics.

!

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Aah to be nieve and not "see the light" !
For crimanies, we have a member here who has actually handled one, did you not RTFT !

Yes, I read that - still not sure if that guy was holding the right watch.

I'll believe it when Rolex announce it.

Sorry - JJ

[esm]

mmm.... The plot thickens...

I should know too since i have the exact TT DJII ;-)

that wrist shot is too blurry for me to see on my phone....

[Welshwatchman]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Sorry guys, but I think the watch on his wrist is different from the one advertised.

The one on his wrist looks like the older 36 mm on Jubilee. I don't believe Rolex have come up with the 41 mm DJ2 on Jubilee.

End of story - JJ

Exactly what I thought. 36mm.

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by esm

mmm.... The plot thickens...

I should know too since i have the exact TT DJII ;-)

that wrist shot is too blurry for me to see on my phone....

That Vanity Fair ad itself is quite stupid. They've got the DJ2 sitting up front on the Oyster............and in the background that guy sporting the DJ on Super Jubilee - makes no sense.

This is a major cock-up on the ad itself.

JJ

[esm]

actually JJ, me thinks it Rolex playing silly buggers with us right before the Basel show.

I didnt think they would release the new bracelet this close before the basel show.....

Sneaky bastids they are me thinks.

More importantly.... How is your dodgy eye JJ? Hope you are giving it plenty of rest!!

[STEELINOX]

Ya buncha numbskulls, why would ROLEX paste this guys mug with a 36 DJ advertising a DJ II ??
That'd b like ROLEX using a DAY-DATE to advertise a DateJust !

[STEELINOX]

Do you see the little "windy thingy" !

[esm]

because someone from rolex putting this ad together had a dodgy eye.... Just like JJ's

;-)

[mrh1797]

Unless that dude is 6'04" 250 or larger that is a Regular DJ....They are dangling the carrot and we are chasing!! JJ is CORRECT!!!

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Ya buncha numbskulls, why would ROLEX paste this guys mug with a 36 DJ advertising a DJ II ??

Like I said, it's a cock-up ad!!

[The GMT Master]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Yes, I read that - still not sure if that guy was holding the right watch.

I'll believe it when Rolex announce it.

Sorry - JJ

I have to agree with JJ here, I'm very sceptical about this.

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Do you see the little "windy thingy" !

The one on the wrist is the 36 mm DJ with Rhodium dial and GOLD Romans.

JJ

[Welshwatchman]

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Ya buncha numbskulls, why would ROLEX paste this guys mug with a 36 DJ advertising a DJ II ??

Some know nothing in the advert agency can't tell the difference between the two?

Other than that who knows.

It's not a DJ2 on the guy's wrist. You can take that all the way to the bureau de change.

[esm]

any chance of a better pic of that ad?

Like i said earlier today, rolex is known for photoshopping their ads to make it confusing for people, or they just plain mixing up 2 different watches in an ad to...... Confuse people

:-)

[STEELINOX]

Ok, you guys win - Im goin to the Bar !

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Ok, you guys win - Im goin to the Bar !

Have a beer on me, buddy!!

[esm]

i will buy the 2nd round!

[jameshe]

Originally Posted by jj irani

sorry guys, but i think the watch on his wrist is different from the one advertised.

The one on his wrist looks like the older 36 mm on jubilee. I don't believe rolex have come up with the 41 mm dj2 on jubilee.

End of story - jj

+1

[sturgeon123456]

i think it looks like a 36mm datejust with arabics

[wzz]

Originally Posted by mactrack

Anyone reckon that we might also see domed bezels which IMHO go better with the DJII's oyster bracelet? The jubilee definitely works with the fluted bezel though.

I agree that the oyster bracelet looks better with a domed bezel.

[Jocke]

Sorry Randy, check it out at Rolex site. JJ is correct but please don't tell him.

[Jocke]

Originally Posted by sturgeon123456

i think it looks like a 36mm datejust with arabics

Will you please give back JJ's glasses and you will see romans too.

[spuds]

I've got an almost 8" wrist & the DJII looks way bigger on mine than it looks on the guy in the ad'.

I've gotta agree with the bald fella on this one chaps.