ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

nyyankees · 12 April 2010, 08:38 PM

Hey guys,

Thinking of trading my COSC Sub ND (Z) for the LV (Z or M). I'd probably be adding cash obviously. which would you choose..keep the Sub or go for the LV? How much cash would you add?

Thanks

bayerische · 12 April 2010, 08:41 PM

LV!

I don't know how much cash, but perhaps 500 to 1000?

Sgt. Henry · 12 April 2010, 10:56 PM

Keep the ND, No wait...... sell it to me!
No I can't I've been grounded from buying new watches for 6 Months

MikeyTX · 13 April 2010, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sgt. Henry

Keep the ND, No wait...... sell it to me!
No I can't I've been grounded from buying new watches for 6 Months

Poor baby Hims must be in the dog house big time ................

STEELINOX · 12 April 2010, 11:04 PM

Find one with lug holes and do it evensee !

Bullyterrier · 13 April 2010, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEELINOX

Find one with lug holes and do it evensee !

Bullyterrier · 13 April 2010, 08:02 AM

I would go with the LV.

I sold my 14060M shortly after getting my LV.

dweller · 12 April 2010, 11:12 PM

I would figure a dealer type would want 1k ++ a forum trader
5-1k...
For me I would keep the COSC, I find it more comfortable
to wear and better looking. The LV is a great watch, but for
me it was an occasional wearer and I wear the ND much more.

Renoir · 12 April 2010, 11:23 PM

That's a tough call. Do you need the date function? If so LV....

Personally I would keep the COSC 14060M.

mike · 12 April 2010, 11:25 PM

Tough call. Money aside the LV would get the nod for me simply because I like the maxi dial and can change the insert to black.

I'm mindfull though that the current Submariner represents the last of a special breed.

zillap · 12 April 2010, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nyyankees

Hey guys,

Thinking of trading my COSC Sub ND (Z) for the LV (Z or M). I'd probably be adding cash obviously. which would you choose..keep the Sub or go for the LV? How much cash would you add?

Thanks

L to the V my friend!

swish77 · 12 April 2010, 11:56 PM

No-brainer: Keep the Sub no-date. It's classic and has the most DNA from the original Sub. I have both and I find I wear the ND more because it's the coolest, simpliest, low-blingy Rolex sports watch out there.

sakuraba · 13 April 2010, 12:54 AM

The LV is more of a second Rolex, and I noticed most owners tend to baby it since it's seen as a collectible. The COSC 14060 however is quite a collectible itself, yet can be worn daily.

Tough choice. Good luck!

t e x · 13 April 2010, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sakuraba

The LV is more of a second Rolex, and I noticed most owners tend to baby it since it's seen as a collectible. The COSC 14060 however is quite a collectible itself, yet can be worn daily.

Tough choice. Good luck!

My newely acquired LV is my one and only and I'm won't be babying it... Absolutely love it

sakuraba · 13 April 2010, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t e x

My newely acquired LV is my one and only and I'm won't be babying it... Absolutely love it

Glad yours will be used as intended, Joel!

BMAN8 · 13 April 2010, 01:01 AM

IMHO, you have to stay away from the forum for a week and forget about trading your 14060M. The grass is not always greener on the other side.

I like the LV but you already have the 14060M - just keep it - it's an awesome watch.

Good luck either way.

cdweller · 13 April 2010, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BMAN8

The grass is not always greener on the other side.

It is on the LV side! I vote LV! I like the date function, and you can have 2 looks w/ a quick bezel swap.

Or, ideally, keep your ND and save up for an LV!

BMAN8 · 13 April 2010, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdweller

It is on the LV side! I vote LV! I like the date function, and you can have 2 looks w/ a quick bezel swap.

Or, ideally, keep your ND and save up for an LV!

I was waiting for someone to jump on that “greener” remark.

I agree, the LV is sweet. Especially since you can also swap out to a black bezel insert.

I ended up getting the 14060M, the 16610 and the 16610LV because I couldn’t decide on only one.

Like cdweller, I would save for the LV if you want it that badly and keep the Sub no date.

MikeyTX · 13 April 2010, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BMAN8

I was waiting for someone to jump on that “greener” remark.

I agree, the LV is sweet. Especially since you can also swap out to a black bezel insert.

I ended up getting the 14060M, the 16610 and the 16610LV because I couldn’t decide on only one.

Like cdweller, I would save for the LV if you want it that badly and keep the Sub no date.

Yup ! Gets my vote

karmatp · 13 April 2010, 06:20 AM

Keep the sub!!! I have owned a couple of no-date subs and one LV. I have no regrets with selling the LV and I just might buy a 3rd 14060 this year. If I do buy another 14060, I will never sell it.

Right now there is a little extra hype regarding the LV, and when the no-date sub gets the ceramic treatment, there will be extra hype regarding it. Don't get sucked in, keep the sub and enjoy it for life.

Gerardus · 13 April 2010, 01:19 AM

Lvvvvvvvvvvv

nauticajoe · 13 April 2010, 01:24 AM

I'd keep the ND.

Lion · 13 April 2010, 01:54 AM

Tough choice as you are the one who will be trading for the other one and then living with your decision. Both are great watches but I would keep the Sub ND.....and then save for the LV so then you wouldn't have to decide!!!

t e x · 13 April 2010, 01:55 AM

Thanks Jib! I never had the intentions of the LV being a safe queen and soon I'll have a black insert. Enroute are six G10's of various colors form a couple of vendors.... hopefully I'll have mail today

beerformeplz · 13 April 2010, 02:02 AM

ND due to its already yours and you dont have to pay 1k to keep it.

Z_Z · 13 April 2010, 02:53 AM

In an ideal world you'd have both. There is no one perfect watch out there.

In my humble opinion, the COSC 14060 appeals more to my refined side because of the history, lug holes and versatility.

The LV is not as versatile and would appeal more to the "blingy" part of my personality.

Jason71 · 13 April 2010, 06:30 AM

Keep the ND and save for the LV

SLS · 13 April 2010, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jclevoy

Keep the ND and save for the LV

x2
Scott

Art 1 · 13 April 2010, 07:24 AM

I would rather have the LV Sub.

12 April 2010, 08:38 PM	#1
nyyankees "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southeastern PA Watch: 1216610 Posts: 2,131	COSC ND or Sub LV? Hey guys, Thinking of trading my COSC Sub ND (Z) for the LV (Z or M). I'd probably be adding cash obviously. which would you choose..keep the Sub or go for the LV? How much cash would you add? Thanks

12 April 2010, 08:41 PM	#2
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	LV! I don't know how much cash, but perhaps 500 to 1000? __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

12 April 2010, 11:04 PM	#5
STEELINOX 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Sink-O! Location: a praire in AZ Watch: ROLEX-less atm... Posts: 14,021	Find one with lug holes and do it evensee ! __________________ *Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !

13 April 2010, 08:02 AM	#7
Bullyterrier "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: . Posts: 1,343	I would go with the LV. I sold my 14060M shortly after getting my LV. __________________ So Mote it be.

12 April 2010, 11:12 PM	#8
dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: usa Posts: 249	Cosc I would figure a dealer type would want 1k ++ a forum trader 5-1k... For me I would keep the COSC, I find it more comfortable to wear and better looking. The LV is a great watch, but for me it was an occasional wearer and I wear the ND much more.

12 April 2010, 10:56 PM	#3
Sgt. Henry "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Mark Location: Mississippi Watch: -less Posts: 303	Keep the ND, No wait...... sell it to me! No I can't I've been grounded from buying new watches for 6 Months

12 April 2010, 11:23 PM	#9
Renoir "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Renato Location: New York Posts: 2,396	That's a tough call. Do you need the date function? If so LV.... Personally I would keep the COSC 14060M.

12 April 2010, 11:25 PM	#10
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Tough call. Money aside the LV would get the nod for me simply because I like the maxi dial and can change the insert to black. I'm mindfull though that the current Submariner represents the last of a special breed.

12 April 2010, 11:56 PM	#12
swish77 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Aaron Location: CT/NYC Watch: ing the time! Posts: 7,001	No-brainer: Keep the Sub no-date. It's classic and has the most DNA from the original Sub. I have both and I find I wear the ND more because it's the coolest, simpliest, low-blingy Rolex sports watch out there.

13 April 2010, 12:54 AM	#13
sakuraba "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Jib Location: SJ, California Watch: sun dial Posts: 8,189	The LV is more of a second Rolex, and I noticed most owners tend to baby it since it's seen as a collectible. The COSC 14060 however is quite a collectible itself, yet can be worn daily. Tough choice. Good luck! __________________ F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland

13 April 2010, 01:01 AM	#16
BMAN8 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: CAN Posts: 629	IMHO, you have to stay away from the forum for a week and forget about trading your 14060M. The grass is not always greener on the other side. I like the LV but you already have the 14060M - just keep it - it's an awesome watch. Good luck either way.

13 April 2010, 06:20 AM	#20
karmatp "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Trevor Location: Arizona Posts: 5,740	Keep the sub!!! I have owned a couple of no-date subs and one LV. I have no regrets with selling the LV and I just might buy a 3rd 14060 this year. If I do buy another 14060, I will never sell it. Right now there is a little extra hype regarding the LV, and when the no-date sub gets the ceramic treatment, there will be extra hype regarding it. Don't get sucked in, keep the sub and enjoy it for life. __________________ My grails:

13 April 2010, 01:19 AM	#21
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	Lvvvvvvvvvvv __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

13 April 2010, 01:24 AM	#22
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	I'd keep the ND.

13 April 2010, 01:54 AM	#23
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	Tough choice as you are the one who will be trading for the other one and then living with your decision. Both are great watches but I would keep the Sub ND.....and then save for the LV so then you wouldn't have to decide!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

13 April 2010, 01:55 AM	#24
t e x "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Joel Location: Renton, WA Watch: 16610LV Posts: 2,990	Thanks Jib! I never had the intentions of the LV being a safe queen and soon I'll have a black insert. Enroute are six G10's of various colors form a couple of vendors.... hopefully I'll have mail today __________________ ___/ /_/ /_____ 16610LV; Ball Diver EMT II \:::::::::::::::/ ~~~~~~~~~~

13 April 2010, 02:02 AM	#25
beerformeplz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Pat Location: chesapeake Watch: seadweller Posts: 764	ND due to its already yours and you dont have to pay 1k to keep it.

13 April 2010, 02:53 AM	#26
Z_Z "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: India Posts: 70	In an ideal world you'd have both. There is no one perfect watch out there. In my humble opinion, the COSC 14060 appeals more to my refined side because of the history, lug holes and versatility. The LV is not as versatile and would appeal more to the "blingy" part of my personality.

13 April 2010, 06:30 AM	#27
Jason71 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jason Location: USA Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers Posts: 7,973	Keep the ND and save for the LV __________________ Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY

13 April 2010, 07:24 AM	#29
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I would rather have the LV Sub.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode