The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 August 2010, 12:13 AM   #1
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirotti View Post
Thanks Chris. Ceramic should be a much more robust material than aluminum and it's a trend a lot of manufacturers have been following the last few years.

I think the real issue that people have and that they don't want to say is that instead of being able to pay $150 for a aluminum bezel insert today, people are concerned that the ceramic will cost multiples more (which is probably true as it's a premium material).
price last week was £26. for aluminium insert for 16610 black.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 10:15 AM   #2
Dr.Brian
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr.Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
There have been photos of a chipped DSSD. If not here, on one of the other big forums. I saw it myself. It broke/chipped off at the pip. Presumably from a diving impact to the raised pip.
I can't understand why people don't believe it. And BTW, if there are multiple reports of it happening here, it's happening 1000x as much to the non forum members throughout the world. Rolex probably has a few hundred thousand of them out, and there are only 40000 of us, and the majority don't have a ceramic bezeled rolex.
The lateral impact theory of breakage also makes a lot of sense to me.
Also, Rolex markets it as a super material, the reality is that it's just ceramic, and ceramic cracks and shatters. Of course the sapphire crystal has the same problems. I'd rather not have it, and I don't.
__________________
-Brian
AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT

十人十色
Dr.Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 10:21 AM   #3
Zirotti
"TRF" Member
 
Zirotti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
I have yet to personally see a broken ceramic insert. And for every 1 story of hear of them, I see/hear 10x as many damaged, bent, scratched aluminum inserts.

If you don't like the ceramic insert, don't buy the watch. End of story.
Zirotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 10:31 AM   #4
Rani Drama
"TRF" Member
 
Rani Drama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
My one cousin who had a GMT IIc sold it and went with a 16610 because he heard to replace the ceramic bezel is expensive. he now just has a 16610 and two tone yacht master. It didn't stop me from getting mine. The 16610 felt cheap in comparison to the 116610. Not that it is cheap it just didn't feel as much of a luxury item.
Rani Drama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 10:38 AM   #5
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Lots of kvetching.

I will get a ceramic bezeled watch at some pt...For those who don't like them or fear paying for a replacement, There are lots of alternatives to choose from :-)
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 10:43 AM   #6
Zirotti
"TRF" Member
 
Zirotti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
Lots of kvetching.

I will get a ceramic bezeled watch at some pt...For those who don't like them or fear paying for a replacement, There are lots of alternatives to choose from :-)
Amen brother.
Zirotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 10:54 AM   #7
Luxe Time
"TRF" Member
 
Luxe Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Raja
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 951
bezel replacement cost for rolex sub 16610?

Slightly off-topic but…

what is the cost for AD / Rolex service to replace a bezel on the 16610? Also, I was wondering if they keep the old bezel that is swapped out? Thanks for the help guys!
Luxe Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 11:01 AM   #8
Zirotti
"TRF" Member
 
Zirotti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
Quote:
Originally Posted by connecticutrolex View Post
Slightly off-topic but…

what is the cost for AD / Rolex service to replace a bezel on the 16610? Also, I was wondering if they keep the old bezel that is swapped out? Thanks for the help guys!
You can buy a replacement from someone like Steve Mulholland for around $150 and do it yourself. It's an easy swap.
Zirotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 11:22 AM   #9
FLB03TT
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by connecticutrolex View Post
Slightly off-topic but…

what is the cost for AD / Rolex service to replace a bezel on the 16610? Also, I was wondering if they keep the old bezel that is swapped out? Thanks for the help guys!
My AD quoted me $80 for a GMT II bezel- Coke, Pepsi or Black- installed. I would think the 16610 bezel would be no more, if not less.
FLB03TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2010, 06:55 AM   #10
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLB03TT View Post
My AD quoted me $80 for a GMT II bezel- Coke, Pepsi or Black- installed. I would think the 16610 bezel would be no more, if not less.
Do u mean bezel or insert??
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 12:00 PM   #11
sakuraba
"TRF" Member
 
sakuraba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by connecticutrolex View Post
Slightly off-topic but…

what is the cost for AD / Rolex service to replace a bezel on the 16610? Also, I was wondering if they keep the old bezel that is swapped out? Thanks for the help guys!
SFO RSC recently changed the insert on my 16600 for $75. They let me walk out with the old one as well.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black
F 16710 GMT Pepsi
F 16570 Explorer II white
T 16600 SD
D 16610 LV

"fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland
sakuraba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 11:44 AM   #12
ingoodtime
"TRF" Member
 
ingoodtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
My GMTIIC bezel has taken some pretty tough hits and no problem whatsoever.
I am not saying none break but that the percentage of damaged bezels VS quanity being worn daily worldwide must be pretyy darn small. Lets talk about everday life and set up an example. Would you not buy a car you love because somebody might door ding it, or back into it? There are always things in life that are beyond our control. Heck, you could buy the watch, walk out of the AD and be killed in a tragic accident. Maybe your bezel will survive, maybe it won't.

If a large number of people were posting that they had bezel damage and it was frequent, well, that would add credence to a thread such as this. But until that happens, I am not wasting energy worrying. If my bezel cracks, I'll pay my repair costs and go on enjoying my watch.
__________________


Lee
ingoodtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 01:26 PM   #13
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by ingoodtime View Post
My GMTIIC bezel has taken some pretty tough hits and no problem whatsoever.
I am not saying none break but that the percentage of damaged bezels VS quanity being worn daily worldwide must be pretyy darn small. Lets talk about everday life and set up an example. Would you not buy a car you love because somebody might door ding it, or back into it? There are always things in life that are beyond our control. Heck, you could buy the watch, walk out of the AD and be killed in a tragic accident. Maybe your bezel will survive, maybe it won't.

If a large number of people were posting that they had bezel damage and it was frequent, well, that would add credence to a thread such as this. But until that happens, I am not wasting energy worrying. If my bezel cracks, I'll pay my repair costs and go on enjoying my watch.

Very well said buddy!!!
mpkRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 01:34 PM   #14
Tek
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aus
Watch: ALL
Posts: 318
RE: IOM nothing wrong with the old clasps and nothing wrong with ceramic bezels. What ever you decide, wear the watch and enjoy, if you worry then stay clear
Tek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 11:55 AM   #15
Zirotti
"TRF" Member
 
Zirotti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
There is a price to pay when you look this good ;)

Zirotti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 12:35 PM   #16
ersnyder
2024 Pledge Member
 
ersnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirotti View Post
There is a price to pay when you look this good ;)

Couldn't agree more Jason!!

ersnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 12:38 PM   #17
FLB03TT
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirotti View Post
There is a price to pay when you look this good ;)

That is an incredibly good photo
FLB03TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 01:39 PM   #18
Flyjet601
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
Only time will tell about ceramics.

Years ago the Rolex engineers didnt think Tritium would turn yellow.......hands would corrode.....dials would crack......bezels would fade.....

the test of time has shown us the results of Rolex R&D.......

so who knows what will happen to a ceramic bezel in 25 years

__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure
Flyjet601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 01:32 PM   #19
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirotti View Post
There is a price to pay when you look this good ;)

Excellent picture buddy!! Gotta love that ceramic..

This is my blackberry shot..
Attached Images
 
mpkRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2010, 09:55 AM   #20
mborkow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirotti View Post
There is a price to pay when you look this good ;)

now that's a money shot. it looks vintage and cutting edge --at the same time...gorgeous.
mborkow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 12:34 PM   #21
scl6118
"TRF" Member
 
scl6118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Shawn
Location: United States
Watch: SS GMT IIC
Posts: 1,624
Don't be scared, the ceramic is very strong!
__________________

Current: SS GMT IIC
Former: Panerai 114
Former: Breitling Hercules

:
scl6118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 01:09 PM   #22
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
I have not even heard of a destroyed aluminum Bezel, let alone seen a picture of one.
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2010, 05:07 AM   #23
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
I just received my new Sub-c, and to make sure I would not have to lie awake nights..

worrying about whether the bezel might end up broken, I just smashed the damn thing with a hammer. Now I can sleep.



A lotta whining namby-pambies out there.
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2010, 08:43 AM   #24
tgoose1
"TRF" Member
 
tgoose1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 668
Even whining namby pambies know its far safer to smash a 16610/16600 with a hammer than the new subc....Gee Wizz for crying out loud! Please let us know what the repair cost was.
tgoose1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2010, 08:52 AM   #25
ess45
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fl.
Posts: 521
The ceramic bezel will not stop me from buying a Sub C but the wide lugs have stopped me.
ess45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2010, 05:15 AM   #26
chris russell
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
Why

ning?
chris russell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 01:20 PM   #27
mpkRolex
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
mpkRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil.tf001 View Post
Hi all, I was planning to make my only big watch purchase to be the new TT black sub. However I See again issues with broken bezels on the new models which is making me nervous. The main reason for the new sub is the new clasp but weighing that against a broken bezel and weeks of repair, warrantee or not has me second guessing.
I know I can insure the watch but still weeks or repair?
Thoughts please.
Neil
I think it would take the same force to shatter the sapphire crystal as to break the ceramic bezel..

I wouldnt worry too much.
mpkRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 05:51 PM   #28
Vlad@GKScott
"TRF" Member
 
Vlad@GKScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Vlad [Scott]
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 23
Ceramic feels definitely better, just what you would expect from a luxury watch. The old ones were nice, but where getting scratched way too easily.
Just one question though.... why do you think old bezels are made out of aluminum... ?
__________________
I can't help you to buy a watch, but I can help you to make it beautiful (WP).
Vlad@GKScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 06:02 PM   #29
jdc
"TRF" Member
 
jdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad@GKScott View Post
Ceramic feels definitely better, just what you would expect from a luxury watch. The old ones were nice, but where getting scratched way too easily.
Just one question though.... why do you think old bezels are made out of aluminum... ?
because they are cheap and easy to replace, the new ceramic model is the new Rolex - flashy, non tool watch, babied by 99% of owners and expensive, its a watch made to conquer a new market
jdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2010, 06:25 PM   #30
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad@GKScott View Post
Ceramic feels definitely better, just what you would expect from a luxury watch. The old ones were nice, but where getting scratched way too easily.
Just one question though.... why do you think old bezels are made out of aluminum... ?
The bezels are made from s.steel its the inserts that was made from aluminium.Well don't know about getting scratched easily mine are now 15/20 years old sure there are a few minor marks.But my watches have done quite a bit of work and had quite a hard life compared to the many pampered Rolex watches today.And yes both have been replaced at very little cost,yes some aliminum inserts do fade. But its mainly the reds and blue on GMT watches,just like the colour red on some cars that fades over the years.While the ceramic looks good its taken Rolex quite a time to jump on the ceramic bandwagon,with brands like Rado having ceramic watches since the 1960s.If ceramic was so wonderful why has the many high brands never used it until the last few years or so.While I agree Rolex must move with the times but at quite a price increase and very expensive to replace the insert if broken up to $900 plus, IMHO this ceramic insert functions the same as the aluminium one and perhaps looks good.Now on some diving forums a few comments that the bezel on the ceramic was far too easy to move while underwater not a good thing in a diving watch if you are just using the time lapse bezel.While I applaud Rolex for the very fine marketing hype I got to ask myself is this a real improvement, if it is its at a very high price.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.