ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
21 August 2010, 12:13 AM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
Quote:
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
|
20 August 2010, 10:15 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
|
There have been photos of a chipped DSSD. If not here, on one of the other big forums. I saw it myself. It broke/chipped off at the pip. Presumably from a diving impact to the raised pip.
I can't understand why people don't believe it. And BTW, if there are multiple reports of it happening here, it's happening 1000x as much to the non forum members throughout the world. Rolex probably has a few hundred thousand of them out, and there are only 40000 of us, and the majority don't have a ceramic bezeled rolex. The lateral impact theory of breakage also makes a lot of sense to me. Also, Rolex markets it as a super material, the reality is that it's just ceramic, and ceramic cracks and shatters. Of course the sapphire crystal has the same problems. I'd rather not have it, and I don't.
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
20 August 2010, 10:21 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
|
I have yet to personally see a broken ceramic insert. And for every 1 story of hear of them, I see/hear 10x as many damaged, bent, scratched aluminum inserts.
If you don't like the ceramic insert, don't buy the watch. End of story. |
20 August 2010, 10:31 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
|
My one cousin who had a GMT IIc sold it and went with a 16610 because he heard to replace the ceramic bezel is expensive. he now just has a 16610 and two tone yacht master. It didn't stop me from getting mine. The 16610 felt cheap in comparison to the 116610. Not that it is cheap it just didn't feel as much of a luxury item.
|
20 August 2010, 10:38 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Lots of kvetching.
I will get a ceramic bezeled watch at some pt...For those who don't like them or fear paying for a replacement, There are lots of alternatives to choose from :-) |
20 August 2010, 10:43 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
|
|
20 August 2010, 10:54 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Raja
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 951
|
bezel replacement cost for rolex sub 16610?
Slightly off-topic but…
what is the cost for AD / Rolex service to replace a bezel on the 16610? Also, I was wondering if they keep the old bezel that is swapped out? Thanks for the help guys! |
20 August 2010, 11:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
|
You can buy a replacement from someone like Steve Mulholland for around $150 and do it yourself. It's an easy swap.
|
20 August 2010, 11:22 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
|
My AD quoted me $80 for a GMT II bezel- Coke, Pepsi or Black- installed. I would think the 16610 bezel would be no more, if not less.
|
22 August 2010, 06:55 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
|
|
20 August 2010, 12:00 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
SFO RSC recently changed the insert on my 16600 for $75. They let me walk out with the old one as well.
__________________
F 14000 AirKing black F 16710 GMT Pepsi F 16570 Explorer II white T 16600 SD D 16610 LV "fine quality is remembered long after the pain of spending money" -Steve Mulholland |
20 August 2010, 11:44 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,834
|
My GMTIIC bezel has taken some pretty tough hits and no problem whatsoever.
I am not saying none break but that the percentage of damaged bezels VS quanity being worn daily worldwide must be pretyy darn small. Lets talk about everday life and set up an example. Would you not buy a car you love because somebody might door ding it, or back into it? There are always things in life that are beyond our control. Heck, you could buy the watch, walk out of the AD and be killed in a tragic accident. Maybe your bezel will survive, maybe it won't. If a large number of people were posting that they had bezel damage and it was frequent, well, that would add credence to a thread such as this. But until that happens, I am not wasting energy worrying. If my bezel cracks, I'll pay my repair costs and go on enjoying my watch.
__________________
Lee |
20 August 2010, 01:26 PM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
|
Quote:
Very well said buddy!!! |
|
20 August 2010, 01:34 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aus
Watch: ALL
Posts: 318
|
RE: IOM nothing wrong with the old clasps and nothing wrong with ceramic bezels. What ever you decide, wear the watch and enjoy, if you worry then stay clear
|
20 August 2010, 11:55 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
|
There is a price to pay when you look this good ;)
|
20 August 2010, 12:35 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
|
|
20 August 2010, 12:38 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
|
|
20 August 2010, 01:39 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
|
Only time will tell about ceramics.
Years ago the Rolex engineers didnt think Tritium would turn yellow.......hands would corrode.....dials would crack......bezels would fade..... the test of time has shown us the results of Rolex R&D....... so who knows what will happen to a ceramic bezel in 25 years
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure |
20 August 2010, 01:32 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
|
Excellent picture buddy!! Gotta love that ceramic..
This is my blackberry shot.. |
21 August 2010, 09:55 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
|
20 August 2010, 12:34 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Shawn
Location: United States
Watch: SS GMT IIC
Posts: 1,624
|
Don't be scared, the ceramic is very strong!
__________________
Current: SS GMT IIC Former: Panerai 114 Former: Breitling Hercules : |
20 August 2010, 01:09 PM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
|
I have not even heard of a destroyed aluminum Bezel, let alone seen a picture of one.
|
21 August 2010, 05:07 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
|
I just received my new Sub-c, and to make sure I would not have to lie awake nights..
worrying about whether the bezel might end up broken, I just smashed the damn thing with a hammer. Now I can sleep.
A lotta whining namby-pambies out there. |
21 August 2010, 08:43 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 668
|
Even whining namby pambies know its far safer to smash a 16610/16600 with a hammer than the new subc....Gee Wizz for crying out loud! Please let us know what the repair cost was.
|
21 August 2010, 08:52 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fl.
Posts: 521
|
The ceramic bezel will not stop me from buying a Sub C but the wide lugs have stopped me.
|
22 August 2010, 05:15 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Peterborough, ON
Watch: your mouth.
Posts: 1,023
|
Why
ning?
|
20 August 2010, 01:20 PM | #27 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,170
|
Quote:
I wouldnt worry too much. |
|
20 August 2010, 05:51 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Vlad [Scott]
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 23
|
Ceramic feels definitely better, just what you would expect from a luxury watch. The old ones were nice, but where getting scratched way too easily.
Just one question though.... why do you think old bezels are made out of aluminum... ?
__________________
I can't help you to buy a watch, but I can help you to make it beautiful (WP). |
20 August 2010, 06:02 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
because they are cheap and easy to replace, the new ceramic model is the new Rolex - flashy, non tool watch, babied by 99% of owners and expensive, its a watch made to conquer a new market
|
20 August 2010, 06:25 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
The bezels are made from s.steel its the inserts that was made from aluminium.Well don't know about getting scratched easily mine are now 15/20 years old sure there are a few minor marks.But my watches have done quite a bit of work and had quite a hard life compared to the many pampered Rolex watches today.And yes both have been replaced at very little cost,yes some aliminum inserts do fade. But its mainly the reds and blue on GMT watches,just like the colour red on some cars that fades over the years.While the ceramic looks good its taken Rolex quite a time to jump on the ceramic bandwagon,with brands like Rado having ceramic watches since the 1960s.If ceramic was so wonderful why has the many high brands never used it until the last few years or so.While I agree Rolex must move with the times but at quite a price increase and very expensive to replace the insert if broken up to $900 plus, IMHO this ceramic insert functions the same as the aluminium one and perhaps looks good.Now on some diving forums a few comments that the bezel on the ceramic was far too easy to move while underwater not a good thing in a diving watch if you are just using the time lapse bezel.While I applaud Rolex for the very fine marketing hype I got to ask myself is this a real improvement, if it is its at a very high price.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.