The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 January 2012, 04:00 AM   #31
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashGap View Post
Coal-powered ("plug in electric") cars would not existing without the political motive, so I guess I have nothing to add...
Thank you.
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2012, 04:42 AM   #32
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashGap View Post
Coal-powered ("plug in electric") cars would not existing without the political motive, so I guess I have nothing to add...
And... The plug-ins that are powered by nuclear power plants? Albeit only 30% (or so), what about those?
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2012, 04:44 AM   #33
blackmsport
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melb - Australia
Posts: 2,959
and where we get extra electricity from

IN australia we are about to reach capacity ..... unless government invest heavily in new plants next 20 years
blackmsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2012, 04:48 AM   #34
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brunotheboxer View Post


Where did you hear this from?

And what do they use to scrub it clean?

Stop listening to the media my friend.
You may be right, I have no sources to back this up, the discovery channel or something. Believe me, I am not a proponent of coal burning anymore then oil burning. Point is: we HAVE to find something else. Is it wind? Solar? Fission? Nuclear? Better battery electric? Whatever, at least electric is an investigation in to something and must be considered. If it proves to be no less-polluting then gas cars, and not really more energy efficient, then on to the next.
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 January 2012, 04:54 AM   #35
Brunotheboxer
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Bruno
Location: Boston/Cape Cod
Watch: 16610,PAM. 111, G
Posts: 7,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
You may be right, I have no sources to back this up, the discovery channel or something. Believe me, I am not a proponent of coal burning anymore then oil burning. Point is: we HAVE to find something else. Is it wind? Solar? Fission? Nuclear? Better battery electric? Whatever, at least electric is an investigation in to something and must be considered. If it proves to be no less-polluting then gas cars, and not really more energy efficient, then on to the next.
Cheers mate!
Brunotheboxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.