ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 August 2007, 01:16 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Lou
Location: New Jersey
Watch: YM TT MOP
Posts: 323
|
Your the man JJ kuddos to you
|
25 August 2007, 06:03 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Me
Posts: 1,950
|
|
25 August 2007, 06:08 PM | #33 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
25 August 2007, 11:04 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Actually, at least in Great Britain (where you have a great tradition of hallmarks), attaching/rolling/fusing (whatever you want to call it) gold to another piece of metal would VOID the "gold" designation. Instead such a combination is called "Mixed metal".
For the same reason you have the 18 kt / 750 hallmark on BOTH the underside of the case AND on the clasp of a DAY-DATE in SOLID gold (i.e. not gold fused to another metal). And therefore you do NOT have any hall marks on the TT Sub. Since hallmark rules do not allow this. I am not saying it is NOT 18 kt. gold on the TT Sub. I am saying that "gold" is just not the right designation as soon as it's is fused to another metal: It is "mixed metal"
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.