Any love for the Explorer I?

[JohnFM]

Every since I saw my Dad's Tudor watch in the mid-1960s, I've been a big fan of Tudor and Rolex, especially the Datejusts, Subs, and Sea Dwellers. I currently own a 16610 Sub and 16600 Sea Dweller, courtesy of Patrick Aziz (ocrolexguy). So many fine sellers here on TRF -- love this forum, not sure my wallet does though.

One problem I've noticed is that I'm interested in the same watches that many of you are! These include Sea Dwellers and the 16610LV, both of which are quite high in price at this point (at least compared to where they were a couple of years ago).

Which brings me to the Explorer I (not the II). As you know, the simple, no-date 36mm Explorer I was recently updated and increased in size to 39mm. What are your thoughts on these two watches compared to one another and to other Rolexes? By the way, my wrist size is 6.75".

Despite the efforts of Sir Edmund Hillary, the Explorer I seems to be a somewhat underappreciated, under-the-radar watch today. Would you agree? Do you see this changing over time, especially as Rolex introduces larger, 'shinier', more expensive watches, such as ceramic Subs and Deep Seas?

I'm considering buying a 36mm Explorer as a traditional Rolex classic. I'm also considering the 14060M no-date Sub for some of the same reasons, though I know this watch receives a whole lot more attention (and maybe more love) here on TRF.

Appreciate your input. I'll take my answer off-line -- I mean on-line!
John