will the x II become the new Sub?

[Robbenisland]

Originally Posted by AH0RSEY

impossible - try diving with an Exp42 and you'll understand why... no uni-directional bezel. So for those who want to dive...its a no brainer.

but - if someone wants to pay me now for the pleasure of my Exp42 but of course pay higher than premium fee's, well I'd be happy with that.

Who seriously goes diving with a Rolex. I dive and I have a number of nice timepieces, but would never consider taking them to dive. Rather take my Suunto Stinger watch/computer as it gives me better and safer information.

[AJMarcus]

No WAY! The Sub will always be in class all by itself!

[karmatp]

The new Explorer II's are the best modern day Rolex watches on the market, so I can see the high demand.

No block case, no gloss dial and gloss ceramic insert, no silly proportions between the case and braclet, the Explorer II is pretty much perfect.

[Hoppyjr]

While I do not see the Explorer 216570 series "replacing" the Sub, I do see how it has become a current favorite. The watch wears well, has the slightly larger size many of us want, and maintains a strong link with historic Rolex styling. I'm not surprised, but then again, I predicted it would be a huge success (back when others were less enthusiastic).

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...56#post2957456

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...99#post2972499

Love mine!

Hoppy

[sportsmaven20]

Originally Posted by karmatp

The new Explorer II's are the best modern day Rolex watches on the market, so I can see the high demand.

No block case, no gloss dial and gloss ceramic insert, no silly proportions between the case and braclet, the Explorer II is pretty much perfect.

I have to agree with you Trevor. I tried one on tonight at a local AD and the watch is simply stunning. The 42mm size is perfect along with the extremely well proportioned case, lugs and bracelet.

I'm hoping it will be my next Rolex!

[ppaus]

IMO EX II have to get passed Daytona and GMT first before comparing to Sub. Nice watch tho. Oh well...I'm no collector just WIS

[nauticajoe]

I can't see that happening. IMO, the Sub will always be THE watch for Rolex aside from the DJ's.

[MrLee]

Originally Posted by nauticajoe

I can't see that happening. IMO, the Sub will always be THE watch for Rolex aside from the DJ's.

X2, think the SubC looks a lot better to be honest, much rather have a gmt if I wanted a gmt watch

[mjclark32]

The sub isn't going anywhere, IMO.

[sportsmaven20]

Originally Posted by mjclark32

The sub isn't going anywhere, IMO.

I agree it's not going anywhere, but if they made a 42mm SubC with more tapered lugs to meet a 21mm bracelet to make it less blocky, I believe the sales would be even better than the current SubC...JMHO.

[swiss ghost]

Originally Posted by sportsmaven20

I agree it's not going anywhere, but if they made a 42mm SubC with more tapered lugs to meet a 21mm bracelet to make it less blocky, I believe the sales would be even better than the current SubC...JMHO.

x2 have to agree here

[scarlet knight]

Rolex fans, please report to your AD , try one on and report back to your fellow watchaholics.

[Time2time]

Not in the same class pal.

[warrior]

The Sub is classic...I'd opt for the EXP II. More original and better looking IMO.

[MYK]

I love the white Explorer II, the fat hands are amazing with the black borders!

[zion_rasta]

The Explorer is just not "Rolex" enough
1. Sub/DSSD
2. GMT
3. Daytona
4. Date Just
5. Yatch
6. Omega Seamaster
7. Explorer II, 42mm or otherwise

Sorry, but I rather buy an Omega before an Explorer.

Sub is king!

[Mickey®]

Originally Posted by zion_rasta

The Explorer is just not "Rolex" enough
1. Sub/DSSD
2. GMT
3. Daytona
4. Date Just
5. Yatch
6. Omega Seamaster
7. Explorer II, 42mm or otherwise

Sorry, but I rather buy an Omega before an Explorer.

Sub is king!

That is bold!

[karmatp]

Originally Posted by Mickey®

That is bold!

I think ignorant is more appropriate, or maybe less informed to be nice.

[samuelhuntington]

Originally Posted by karmatp

I think ignorant is more appropriate, or maybe less informed to be nice.

Or just his own honest opinion.

[Watchflair]

The Sub is the Sub. No arguing that. It is by all means the quinessential Rolex. James Bond wore one etc etc etc... No question.

HOWEVER, the Explorer should not be taken lightly. The case, size, coloring, and all the details are just 100% on this watch. Rolex definitely got this one right. I could see this watch being a hugely successful watch for Rolex.

[landroverking]

Only 42mm Exp II guys hope so. Keep wishing.

[supertrooper]

Originally Posted by nitros

i read the the white 42mm X II is the most want rolex, ATM, because most of the collectors start to realised the potential.

is that true?

Dunno, they said the same thing back in the 90's when I was in the market for one.

[DCCS]

I just got an "old" polar explorer and it is just the business. Very much more stealth and subtle for everyday wear than any other larger sports watch. It is the quiet rolex.

[krieves]

Hi everyone, I'm new to the forum and have been a Ex II owner for about 2 years. I call it the it the "un-Rolex" Rolex. It's a subtle watch that doesn't draw much attention. That's one of it's charms in my humble opinion.

[esm]

nope - only the 216570 fanboys will think so.

[scarlet knight]

Love my polar 42! I enjoy it whether it is collectible, popular or not!

[JohnFM]

For the Explorer II to become the new Sub, it would have to be copied for years as the Sub has been copied.

The Sub has a certain understated, classic, rugged simplicity that is hard to match. To my eye, the Explorer II is bolder and, if anything, more sporty looking and casual that the Sub, which means it may appeal to a slighter smaller audience.

That said, Rolex did a superb job with the Explorer II. The watch has all the features one could want and the case and bracelet are beautifully balanced, maybe more so than the new Sub-C. Still, in terms of the overall look, I can't imagine it supplanting the Submariner.

Been wrong before though ... ;-)

[tkerrmd]

No

[HL65]

No

[sleddog]

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

No

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

No

Also no!