ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which would you rather? | |||
Explorer II | 41 | 31.54% | |
GMT II C | 89 | 68.46% | |
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24 January 2013, 08:56 AM | #31 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Jan
Location: PA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,110
|
I voted with my money - GMT IIc with brushed PCL (brushed by my AD about 3 months after purchase when I just could not bear more scratches on PCL). Tool watch without too much bling.
Love the GMT hand, ceramic bezel I can set to any time zone and the quickset 12 hour hand. Either one you pick you will have great watch. |
24 January 2013, 08:57 AM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Ron
Location: Laguna Niguel, Ca
Watch: Rolex 116613LN
Posts: 1,724
|
Gmt
|
24 January 2013, 09:01 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
GMTIIC for me.
Good luck! |
24 January 2013, 09:02 AM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Gmtc, both are very functional but this just looks so much better.
|
24 January 2013, 10:13 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: Texas
Watch: 15 and counting!
Posts: 3,534
|
I voted for the GMTIIc because it has more of a luxurious look and feel to it. I do like the Black dial Exp II but if I didn't have either(and I only have the GMTIIc.......but) I would get the GMT. Tough choice!
|
24 January 2013, 10:30 AM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
GMT II C for me
|
24 January 2013, 10:32 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollywood
Watch: SMP007/GMTIIC/DSSD
Posts: 204
|
GMT for me. that is my first rolex and it still goes on rotation with the rest of the watches.
|
24 January 2013, 10:49 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
|
I find it harder to read the time with the GMT IIC with all the busyness and bold numbers and no color break up. Also, I find the GMT ( with all the flash and bold numbers) less of a timeless style.
I'd go EXPII. It looks good.... not too "look at me". |
24 January 2013, 11:16 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Explorer II for me
|
24 January 2013, 11:26 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,602
|
GMT would be my first choice if the Submariner didn't exist.
but alas it does and i own it so Explorer is a no brainer for me •black bezel so much like a sub •2 time zones seems like just the right amount ... 3 timezones, what would i do with 3 timezones
__________________
|
24 January 2013, 11:28 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: George
Location: NYC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,105
|
I wanted to thank everyone for all of their invaluable feedback, I wholeheartedly appreciate it. I have made my decision and an "incoming" will be here soon, look out for it.
|
24 January 2013, 11:29 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Voted for gmt. Then read the post. And I bet you would like both.
|
24 January 2013, 11:36 AM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nelson
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 2,466
|
GMT, George!
|
24 January 2013, 11:38 AM | #44 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
Duuuuude! I'll chant it for you: G-M-T!!! G-M-T!!! G-M-T!!!
Ceramic + green hand = no brainer! =) |
24 January 2013, 11:42 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: George
Location: NYC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,105
|
|
24 January 2013, 11:42 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Georgian
Location: Constanta_Romania
Watch: 216570 Polar
Posts: 904
|
Be more original;go for the EXPII
|
24 January 2013, 11:46 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: George
Location: NYC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,105
|
|
24 January 2013, 01:54 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
GMT-II
|
24 January 2013, 02:12 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
GMT all life long:)
|
24 January 2013, 10:49 PM | #50 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
George Id be so impressed if you went against the 73% of members here and got the Expy... lets see...
|
24 January 2013, 11:47 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: uruguay
Watch: your step!
Posts: 430
|
Gmt C first, then EXP 2 for me
|
24 January 2013, 11:52 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: steve
Location: sydney
Watch: SMURF
Posts: 653
|
|
24 January 2013, 11:54 PM | #53 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
I have owned both. GMT IIC. Best looking modern SS Rolex in my humble opinion.
|
25 January 2013, 12:59 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
Gmt iic
|
25 January 2013, 01:10 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utah
Posts: 72
|
Cermic GMT is hard to beat! Dresses up/down a little easier than the EXP II IMHO.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.