The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 September 2013, 01:25 AM   #31
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by polarinda View Post
Why is your T on a 93150?
Here you go. And by the way I love the 93150.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=313760
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2013, 02:03 AM   #32
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
And thank you to everyone that helped me see the light. I am going to send the T serial to Rikki and get a nice fresh service, then enjoy the crap out of this watch!!
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2013, 11:29 AM   #33
Rikki
TechXpert
 
Rikki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
Sounds like a plan. Rikki
__________________
Century 21 Certified watchmaker
Omega Service Provider Trained
Omega OWME Certified.
Rolex Parts Account Holder.
Rikki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2013, 12:59 PM   #34
versatile1
"TRF" Member
 
versatile1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
Do it!!
__________________
Everything will be okay in the end.
If it's not okay, it's not the end.

Life is a cruel teacher
It will give you the test first and the lesson later
versatile1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2013, 11:36 AM   #35
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
Again thanks for all the opinions, but I have an opportunity to buy an SEL and Luminova Exp II from a trusted TRF seller for $500 over and above my current T serial.

That change any opinions? Because I decided to do it.
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2013, 09:51 PM   #36
John in MA
"TRF" Member
 
John in MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexPete View Post
Again thanks for all the opinions, but I have an opportunity to buy an SEL and Luminova Exp II from a trusted TRF seller for $500 over and above my current T serial.

That change any opinions? Because I decided to do it.
Yes. If the goal is a watch with SEL and ability to see it at night and that's the only difference I would do it as well. It is a modern watch after all. IMO a tritium based Rolex should be one with a matte dial.
__________________
Formerly John in SC and John in TN

How To: Remove a Tudor Pelagos Endlink in 60 Seconds or Less
John in MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2013, 06:08 AM   #37
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
Although I love the tritium dialed Exp II, I just got the SEL/luminova model today. I managed to pick up a late A serial 16570 in near mint shape for a trusted forum member. It cost me $600 over and above my T serial, which I sold today. To me, it is worth the upgrade.

The solid SEL and the insanely bright markers win the day. $1500 might not be worth it, but $600 is!

I mean, what's not to love??:

__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2013, 06:54 AM   #38
John in MA
"TRF" Member
 
John in MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexPete View Post

I mean, what's not to love??:

Nothing. Good score.
__________________
Formerly John in SC and John in TN

How To: Remove a Tudor Pelagos Endlink in 60 Seconds or Less
John in MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2013, 02:31 PM   #39
A.Sharp
"TRF" Member
 
A.Sharp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,062
i would personally do it. I am thinking of spending close to that to just get a new bracelet for one of my watches.
__________________
A.Sharp

"I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland."
A.Sharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2013, 09:35 PM   #40
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
Best $600 I have ever spent. At 5:30 this morning the hands and markers were still glowing, and had not seen any light since 8:30 pm. Was able to tell that it was 5:30. How handy!
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 September 2013, 10:25 PM   #41
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
Good deal!
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2013, 03:44 AM   #42
RolexPete
"TRF" Member
 
RolexPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,963
I sent the watch of to Rikki for a full service. I spoke to him on the phone several times, and let me tell you he is one hell of a nice guy. I was planning on picking it up in person on an upcoming trip to Lakeland FL but the trip is being postponed so I am just going to have it shipped. I may swing by Seminole when I do get to FL and say hi to him. Will post details on the overhaul when I get it back next week.
__________________

2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601
1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000
Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324
*RIP PAL 1942-2015
RolexPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2013, 05:16 AM   #43
stockae92
2024 Pledge Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,964
Keep the watch, service it and wear it. :)
__________________
135
├┼┼╕
246 R
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.