ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 December 2013, 08:21 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
|
To each his own.
|
13 December 2013, 08:24 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
|
My thoughts too!
" the new case introduces a new factor: almost unlimited case refinishing. I would imagine that after 80 years of solid use and refinishing, the case dimensions would be getting close the the previous case instead of being junk if heavily damaged."
Thanks, Rolex! You made a durable tool watch!!![/QUOTE] Yes, in 30-40 years of hard wearing and refinishing I might love the case by then |
13 December 2013, 08:24 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
|
I have to agree that I prefer the pre-ceramic submariner case design with the tapered body that seems to flow into the bracelet as one continuous line to the eye.
The new design certainty appears visually bigger with the wider more squared off case. I just like the way the classic sub body looks.
__________________
16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!" |
13 December 2013, 10:52 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
|
16610/ 116610 answer
I had a 16610 and now I have a 116610. The new one is much more striking and has a great presence. They also say that the ceramic bezel will not scratch. After getting used on me when I tried the previous version it seemed very small and outdated. It is as comfortable to use as the old one. The only bad is that in despite of have the Parachcrom Blue ... bla ... bla ..the watch still is having differences by month unacceptability. I mean forward in my watch or backward in others. If until the end of the guarantee in January 2015 did not fix I will sell it and return to quartz. Omega has a cute quartz model. I don't know if it has a modern size of case 40/41 mm.
|
13 December 2013, 10:54 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
Very stunning pictures!
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
13 December 2013, 11:04 AM | #36 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
13 December 2013, 11:12 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Sorry to hear. It is a change from prior models, but after wearing mine for a few days straight, I must admit that I love it.
|
13 December 2013, 11:30 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
|
I love the Sub-C, so solid and comfy. IMHO,the Sub-C bracelet and clasp looks and feels great on the wrist, the older Sub's clasp and bracelet feels inferior and flimsy on the wrist compared to the Sub-C...again, it's my opinion only.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.