The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 December 2013, 08:21 AM   #31
jhcam8
"TRF" Member
 
jhcam8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: SE MI, USA
Watch: Sub C
Posts: 2,068
To each his own.
jhcam8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 08:24 AM   #32
Tri-National-Man
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-National-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Devonshire
Watch: SubND/D/LV
Posts: 651
My thoughts too!

" the new case introduces a new factor: almost unlimited case refinishing. I would imagine that after 80 years of solid use and refinishing, the case dimensions would be getting close the the previous case instead of being junk if heavily damaged."

Thanks, Rolex! You made a durable tool watch!!![/QUOTE]

Yes, in 30-40 years of hard wearing and refinishing I might love the case by then
Tri-National-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 08:24 AM   #33
LA_LEC
"TRF" Member
 
LA_LEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
I have to agree that I prefer the pre-ceramic submariner case design with the tapered body that seems to flow into the bracelet as one continuous line to the eye.

The new design certainty appears visually bigger with the wider more squared off case. I just like the way the classic sub body looks.
__________________
1661016610LV214270 MK2
"Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!"
LA_LEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 10:52 AM   #34
Aventura
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
16610/ 116610 answer

I had a 16610 and now I have a 116610. The new one is much more striking and has a great presence. They also say that the ceramic bezel will not scratch. After getting used on me when I tried the previous version it seemed very small and outdated. It is as comfortable to use as the old one. The only bad is that in despite of have the Parachcrom Blue ... bla ... bla ..the watch still is having differences by month unacceptability. I mean forward in my watch or backward in others. If until the end of the guarantee in January 2015 did not fix I will sell it and return to quartz. Omega has a cute quartz model. I don't know if it has a modern size of case 40/41 mm.
Aventura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 10:54 AM   #35
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
Very stunning pictures!
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 11:04 AM   #36
up2nogood
"TRF" Member
 
up2nogood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-National-Man View Post
" the new case introduces a new factor: almost unlimited case refinishing. I would imagine that after 80 years of solid use and refinishing, the case dimensions would be getting close the the previous case instead of being junk if heavily damaged."

Thanks, Rolex! You made a durable tool watch!!!
Quote:
Yes, in 30-40 years of hard wearing and refinishing I might love the case by then
You could shorten that period by wearing on construction sites!
up2nogood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 11:12 AM   #37
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
Sorry to hear. It is a change from prior models, but after wearing mine for a few days straight, I must admit that I love it.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 December 2013, 11:30 AM   #38
watchyou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
I love the Sub-C, so solid and comfy. IMHO,the Sub-C bracelet and clasp looks and feels great on the wrist, the older Sub's clasp and bracelet feels inferior and flimsy on the wrist compared to the Sub-C...again, it's my opinion only.
watchyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.