ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
18 June 2008, 02:49 AM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Quote:
Perhaps I do not understand this at all, but I've checked all my oyster bracelets (which are of three different versions). Best, A |
|
18 June 2008, 07:08 AM | #2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
-Steven |
|
19 June 2008, 01:46 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
The thing is that the half link (which is only delivered on submariners b.t.w) is permanently attached to the clasp, so you are still stuck with four non removable links on each side.
The issue here is that most people with thin wrist would need fewer fixed links on the six o'clock side. This is partly adressed by the half-link. On the other hand, the new all solid oyster bracelet have a different clasp, which improves adjustability. I'll try to get som pictures on my bracelets to try to give examples. Best, A |
16 June 2008, 11:18 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
|
On another thread, someone also suggested gaining enough weight to make it snug. That sounds like more fun than swapping out links.
__________________
____________________________________________ Rolex Blue TT Submariner Rolex SS Submariner Breitling Emergency Mission **They are just watches, wear 'em.** ____________________________________________ |
16 June 2008, 11:24 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 650
|
Quote:
If I had a permanent link taken out on the 6 o'clock side, it would ruin the natural taper of the SD's bracelet. Is there no way of getting a slightly larger link on the 6 o'clock side that attaches to the clasp AND maintains a correct taper after removing 1 permanent link?? SNB |
|
19 June 2008, 03:26 AM | #6 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI
Posts: 420
|
Quote:
|
|
18 June 2008, 07:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Of course the Expy2 and older GMT2's had an inherent problem in that they did not align properly, but many of us rectified this by moving one link from the 6 o'clock position to the 12 o'clock position. Should your watch be too big with all links, try removing a link from the 6 o'clock side first as it usually will be better wearing that way.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
19 June 2008, 03:13 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 131
|
I think that there can not be less than 5 links on the 6 o'clock position (4 fixed and 1 removable, connected to the clasp). It seems that one less link would have been better for me.
|
19 June 2008, 03:44 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
|
My clasp is perfectly central but the watch always moves about 1/2 inch round to the wrist bone above 12 o/clock.
Every watch i have does it. Don't know why.
__________________
Lest we forget. |
19 June 2008, 05:52 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 131
|
I reversed my bracelet (Exp1). The watch will have tendency to go outwards because of weight and usual position of the wrist, if it is loose enough albeit centred. Since the links can not be less than 5 on 6 o'clock side, it can not be centred if your wrist is small. By reversing, the watch kind of centres itself.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.