ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which steel Nautilus would you get? | |||
5726 gray dial | 23 | 16.43% | |
5726 white dial | 3 | 2.14% | |
5980 blue dial | 34 | 24.29% | |
5980 gray dial | 8 | 5.71% | |
5980 white dial | 1 | 0.71% | |
5990 | 27 | 19.29% | |
Forget complications, 5711 all the way | 26 | 18.57% | |
Just sit tight and wait for the 40th anniversary | 18 | 12.86% | |
Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19 April 2016, 04:43 PM | #31 | ||||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, that's my issue: it's hard to pick from 3 great watches ;) Great photos, thanks! :) Quote:
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
||||
19 April 2016, 04:54 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
5726 Grey Dial if I had to get one right now, however, if it were me personally I would wait to see what they do for the 40th anniversary. The 40th anniversary option is how I voted.
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
19 April 2016, 04:56 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
I've mentioned in the OP that I don't like asymmetric dials. As much as I adore the complication of the 5712 and the fact that it's a fun time piece, it's not for me. Same goes for dressier Pateks: I'd love to get a 5127J, 5140P, 5146G (etc), but the complete lack of dressy occasions in my life would relegate those watches to be safe queens. I need a Patek that I can wear every day, one that looks great with t-shirt, jeans and sneakers.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
19 April 2016, 05:42 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 219
|
Have both and hard to choose which is better
Since you don't need it for travelling, just get the 5726. Very useful complication and it's thinner. 5726 is my go to daily watch.
The 5990 looks and feels sportier because of the heft and the chronograph function. If you want sportier, 5990 but the there's at least 10k usd price difference. Only you can answer if it's worth the premium especially since you don't use travel time. I love how PP made an ear shaped travel time function to maintain the look of the Naut. They invested money with the new tooling! |
19 April 2016, 11:26 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 138
|
|
20 April 2016, 12:18 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
|
I own 5711 5712 and 5980.. Out of all three, the 5980 wears the most balance and most comfortable on my wrist. Some might think the 5711 being the lightest and the thinnest case profile ought to be the most comfortable, I however find the 5980 best fit my wrist n preferences. You must try them out before you buy. Good luck.
|
21 April 2016, 10:03 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London, UK
Watch: Patek 5170j
Posts: 64
|
The 5711 or 5712.
They're so slim that they manage to look elegant too. The others are too chunky and I feel that they're a bit blingy too - kinda "look-at-me" Pateks... |
22 April 2016, 09:05 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ZRH
Posts: 1,209
|
I understand what you say and I think you should go for a 5980, you wont regret it.
However (my two cents), I think the pushers distract from the original case design and from the looks of the first nautilus styling. This style was exactly what appealed to me, the smoothness and completeness of the way the case is designed (just a simple porthole - portholes didnt have pushers, lol) and the way the bracelet meets the case. I personally feel the 5980 and 5990 look like "there is too much weight distributed on one side of the watch". The biggest issue for me with the 5990 is the fact that the hinge, a key design characteristic, has been replaced by additional pushers - a no go for me. The 5726 is a very balanced design that holds true to the clean case dsign of the first models. Whatever you choose: you are going to love it |
22 April 2016, 03:01 PM | #39 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
You're forgetting the best one... brown dials.
|
22 April 2016, 03:54 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Thank you guys for all your comments and suggestions.
I have to agree about the 5711 being more true to the Nautilus roots. But, as I've explained above, I'm afraid of my collection becoming too boring if I keep piling up of 2/3-hand '70s design steel watches. Ingenieur, Royal Oak and Seventies Panorama Date would already be 3 of the same thing (well... I know, they aren't that similar, but still). And I'd like to have Patek stand out in my collection by having such a complication that none others have. AFAIK not many manufacturers make chrono the way it's done in the 5980 and 5990, and I haven't yet seen any other watch combining chrono with travel time like the 5990. As much as I respect the 3700 and 5711, I find the more complicated Nautilus versions more interesting. Even when they're not that true to their origins (like with the ears of 5990). BTW, even the 5711 is not as pure as it should be: it really should lose the seconds hand ;) Quite frankly, I don't think I'm ready for a RG or YG watch. I live in a country where in most places it's not appropriate to wear a gold watch that can be identified as a gold watch. In certain countries certain stigmas are stuck to gold watches :) A 5711P or a hypothetical 5980P would be a completely different story, but it can only be a long-term goal for me.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
24 April 2016, 03:46 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Gollum
Location: Narnia
Watch: Patek
Posts: 138
|
You can't really compare value between a discontinued model and a current production model. Of course it's human nature to favour what they can't have/ easily buy. The main reason for price increases on discontinued models. If i could own both i most certainly would! The 5980 is a stunner, but i find the calendar complication more useful.
|
Tags |
5726 , 5980 , 5990 , nautilus |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.